Do social protection programmes affect the burden of breast and cervical cancer? A systematic review

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Open Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1016/j.hpopen.2024.100122
Ligia Gabrielli , Sheila M. Alvim Matos , Ana Luísa Patrão , Emanuelle F. Góes , Maria da Conceição C. Almeida , Greice M.S. Menezes , Isabel dos-Santos-Silva , Gulnar Azevedo e Silva , Maria Teresa Bustamante-Teixeira , Mauricio L. Barreto , Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi , Alastair H. Leyland , Luana Ferreira Campos , Ester Maria Dias Fernandes de Novaes , Daniela de Almeida Pereira , Elvira Rodrigues Santana , Fernanda Rodrigues Gonçalves Zeferino , Ana Cleide da Silva Dias , Fábio G. Fernandes , Ana Cristina de Oliveira Costa , Estela M.L. Aquino
{"title":"Do social protection programmes affect the burden of breast and cervical cancer? A systematic review","authors":"Ligia Gabrielli ,&nbsp;Sheila M. Alvim Matos ,&nbsp;Ana Luísa Patrão ,&nbsp;Emanuelle F. Góes ,&nbsp;Maria da Conceição C. Almeida ,&nbsp;Greice M.S. Menezes ,&nbsp;Isabel dos-Santos-Silva ,&nbsp;Gulnar Azevedo e Silva ,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Bustamante-Teixeira ,&nbsp;Mauricio L. Barreto ,&nbsp;Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi ,&nbsp;Alastair H. Leyland ,&nbsp;Luana Ferreira Campos ,&nbsp;Ester Maria Dias Fernandes de Novaes ,&nbsp;Daniela de Almeida Pereira ,&nbsp;Elvira Rodrigues Santana ,&nbsp;Fernanda Rodrigues Gonçalves Zeferino ,&nbsp;Ana Cleide da Silva Dias ,&nbsp;Fábio G. Fernandes ,&nbsp;Ana Cristina de Oliveira Costa ,&nbsp;Estela M.L. Aquino","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2024.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Socioeconomic conditions are strongly associated with breast and cervical cancer incidence and mortality patterns; therefore, social protection programmes (SPPs) might impact these cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of SPPs on breast and cervical cancer outcomes and their risk/protective factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five databases were searched for articles that assessed participation in PPS and the incidence, survival, mortality (primary outcomes), screening, staging at diagnosis and risk/protective factors (secondary outcomes) for these cancers. Only peer-reviewed quantitative studies of women receiving SPPs compared to eligible women not receiving benefits were included. Independent reviewers selected articles, assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A harvest plot represents the included studies and shows the direction of effect, sample size and risk of bias.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Of 17,080 documents retrieved, 43 studies were included in the review. No studies evaluated the primary outcomes. They all examined the relationship between SPPs and screening, as well as risk and protective factors. The harvest plot showed that in lower risk of bias studies, participants of SPPs had lower weight and fertility, were older at sexual debut, and breastfed their infants for longer.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>No studies have yet assessed the effect of SPPs on breast and cervical cancer incidence, survival, or mortality; nevertheless, the existing evidence suggests positive impacts on risk and protective factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229624000078/pdfft?md5=6c2f8be0bcd84bf92f179eab98d77eef&pid=1-s2.0-S2590229624000078-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229624000078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Socioeconomic conditions are strongly associated with breast and cervical cancer incidence and mortality patterns; therefore, social protection programmes (SPPs) might impact these cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of SPPs on breast and cervical cancer outcomes and their risk/protective factors.

Methods

Five databases were searched for articles that assessed participation in PPS and the incidence, survival, mortality (primary outcomes), screening, staging at diagnosis and risk/protective factors (secondary outcomes) for these cancers. Only peer-reviewed quantitative studies of women receiving SPPs compared to eligible women not receiving benefits were included. Independent reviewers selected articles, assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A harvest plot represents the included studies and shows the direction of effect, sample size and risk of bias.

Findings

Of 17,080 documents retrieved, 43 studies were included in the review. No studies evaluated the primary outcomes. They all examined the relationship between SPPs and screening, as well as risk and protective factors. The harvest plot showed that in lower risk of bias studies, participants of SPPs had lower weight and fertility, were older at sexual debut, and breastfed their infants for longer.

Interpretation

No studies have yet assessed the effect of SPPs on breast and cervical cancer incidence, survival, or mortality; nevertheless, the existing evidence suggests positive impacts on risk and protective factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会保护计划会影响乳腺癌和宫颈癌的负担吗?系统回顾
背景社会经济条件与乳腺癌和宫颈癌的发病率和死亡率模式密切相关;因此,社会保护计划(SPPs)可能会对这些癌症产生影响。本研究旨在评估社会保护计划对乳腺癌和宫颈癌结果及其风险/保护因素的影响。方法在五个数据库中搜索了评估参与社会保护计划以及这些癌症的发病率、存活率、死亡率(主要结果)、筛查、诊断分期和风险/保护因素(次要结果)的文章。只有经过同行评审的关于接受 SPP 的妇女与符合条件但未接受补助的妇女的定量研究才被纳入。独立审稿人筛选文章、评估资格、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。研究结果在检索到的 17,080 篇文献中,有 43 项研究被纳入综述。没有研究对主要结果进行评估。这些研究都考察了 SPP 与筛查之间的关系,以及风险和保护因素。收获图显示,在偏差风险较低的研究中,SPPs 的参与者体重和生育率较低,初次性行为时年龄较大,母乳喂养婴儿的时间较长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
The cost of the reemergence of monkeypox: An overview of health financing in Africa Closing the equity gap: A call for policy and programmatic reforms to ensure inclusive and effective HIV prevention, treatment and care for persons with disabilities in Eastern and Southern Africa Patient’s willingness to pay for improved community health insurance in Tanzania Improving antibiotic prescribing – Recommendations for funding and pricing policies to enhance use of point-of-care tests From theory to practice: Harmonizing taxonomies of trustworthy AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1