“Theory will take you only so far” (Nolan, 2023): In search of greater insight through quantitative, observation-based research

IF 11.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Business Logistics Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1111/jbl.12383
Theodore Stank, Lance W. Saunders, Alex Scott, Chad W. Autry, Terry L. Esper
{"title":"“Theory will take you only so far” (Nolan, 2023): In search of greater insight through quantitative, observation-based research","authors":"Theodore Stank,&nbsp;Lance W. Saunders,&nbsp;Alex Scott,&nbsp;Chad W. Autry,&nbsp;Terry L. Esper","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Theories developed for understanding the general management or economic phenomena are increasingly ineffective for explaining logistics/SCM-specific phenomena, despite the best efforts of LSCM researchers to utilize them for those purposes. Unfortunately, the hierarchies and infrastructure in place to ensure LSCM research is theoretically grounded and conducted with scholarly rigor have not advanced to a point where the use of alternative methods to explore such questions is common. The key objective of this paper is to guide where empirical LSCM research could evolve if it took its relationship with theory a step further. Our thesis is that inductive research using empirical data can yield additional insightful answers to relevant questions. We hope that discussion of these topics from a 2024 perspective can spur more research that uses empirical analysis <i>as a starting point</i> to create new theory in LSCM and, importantly, to persuade members working in our field to respect and accept rigorous empirical research conducted outside the traditional deductive, logical positivist paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbl.12383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theories developed for understanding the general management or economic phenomena are increasingly ineffective for explaining logistics/SCM-specific phenomena, despite the best efforts of LSCM researchers to utilize them for those purposes. Unfortunately, the hierarchies and infrastructure in place to ensure LSCM research is theoretically grounded and conducted with scholarly rigor have not advanced to a point where the use of alternative methods to explore such questions is common. The key objective of this paper is to guide where empirical LSCM research could evolve if it took its relationship with theory a step further. Our thesis is that inductive research using empirical data can yield additional insightful answers to relevant questions. We hope that discussion of these topics from a 2024 perspective can spur more research that uses empirical analysis as a starting point to create new theory in LSCM and, importantly, to persuade members working in our field to respect and accept rigorous empirical research conducted outside the traditional deductive, logical positivist paradigm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"理论只能走这么远"(诺兰,2023 年):通过以观察为基础的定量研究寻求更深入的洞察力
为理解一般管理或经济现象而开发的理论越来越无法有效解释物流/供应链管理的具体现象,尽管物流供应链管理研究人员尽最大努力将其用于这些目的。遗憾的是,为确保物流与供应链管理研究以理论为基础并以严谨的学术态度进行而设立的等级制度和基础设施,尚未发展到普遍使用替代方法来探讨此类问题的程度。本文的主要目的是指导 LSCM 实证研究如何进一步发展其与理论的关系。我们的论点是,利用经验数据进行归纳研究,可以为相关问题提供更多具有洞察力的答案。我们希望,从2024年的视角讨论这些话题,能够激励更多的研究以经验分析为起点,在LSCM领域创建新的理论,更重要的是,说服我们领域的成员尊重并接受在传统演绎、逻辑实证主义范式之外进行的严谨的经验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Supply chain management and logistics processes play a crucial role in the success of businesses, both in terms of operations, strategy, and finances. To gain a deep understanding of these processes, it is essential to explore academic literature such as The Journal of Business Logistics. This journal serves as a scholarly platform for sharing original ideas, research findings, and effective strategies in the field of logistics and supply chain management. By providing innovative insights and research-driven knowledge, it equips organizations with the necessary tools to navigate the ever-changing business environment.
期刊最新文献
Transformative supply chain research: A new frontier for SCM scholars Perfect couple or toxic relationship? A meta-analysis of the effects and interplays of lean and agile strategies to improve performance “Theory will take you only so far” (Nolan, 2023): In search of greater insight through quantitative, observation-based research Using middle-range theorizing to advance supply chain management research: A how-to primer and demonstration Experiments in supply chain management research: A systematic review and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1