Adaptation into Spanish and reliability analysis of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes mini (Maps-mini-Es)

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101822
Maria del Mar Fernandez-Alvarez , Pilar de la Fuente-Laso , Alberto Lana , Ruben Martin-Payo
{"title":"Adaptation into Spanish and reliability analysis of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes mini (Maps-mini-Es)","authors":"Maria del Mar Fernandez-Alvarez ,&nbsp;Pilar de la Fuente-Laso ,&nbsp;Alberto Lana ,&nbsp;Ruben Martin-Payo","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In recent times, we have witnessed an increase in population growth and a tendency to live in urban environments. Walkability is an indicator based on characteristics of the physical environment to determine the association between environmental conditions and health behaviours. It would therefore appear that assessing walkability can contribute to establishing strategies for improving healthy behaviours and population health. In this study, our aim was to adapt and assess the metric properties of the Spanish version of MAPS-Mini for assessing walkability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Firstly, the adaptation and translation process was carried out. Subsequently, to assess the reliability of the Spanish version of MAPS-Mini, two raters (E1 and E2) used it independently at street level for 93 segments selected by convenience. Four weeks later, E1 re-evaluated 50 sections randomly selected from the 93 evaluated segments (re-evaluation). Inter-observer reliability and temporal stability were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No major differences were observed between the original and the Spanish version of MAPS-mini. The average ratings observed by E1 and E2 were 42.2 (SD = 11.5) and 46.5 (SD = 13.1), respectively. The average rating observed in the re-evaluation was 43.4 (SD = 14.2). Cronbach's Alpha showed a rating of 0.972 and the correlation of ratings between E1 and E2, and E1 and the re-evaluation, were higher than 0.9.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Spanish version of MAPS-mini has adequate metric properties for assessing the walkability of urban environments using measurements at street level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 101822"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000689/pdfft?md5=d6ca790af150bc829739dd8c03ec6600&pid=1-s2.0-S2214140524000689-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In recent times, we have witnessed an increase in population growth and a tendency to live in urban environments. Walkability is an indicator based on characteristics of the physical environment to determine the association between environmental conditions and health behaviours. It would therefore appear that assessing walkability can contribute to establishing strategies for improving healthy behaviours and population health. In this study, our aim was to adapt and assess the metric properties of the Spanish version of MAPS-Mini for assessing walkability.

Methods

Firstly, the adaptation and translation process was carried out. Subsequently, to assess the reliability of the Spanish version of MAPS-Mini, two raters (E1 and E2) used it independently at street level for 93 segments selected by convenience. Four weeks later, E1 re-evaluated 50 sections randomly selected from the 93 evaluated segments (re-evaluation). Inter-observer reliability and temporal stability were assessed.

Results

No major differences were observed between the original and the Spanish version of MAPS-mini. The average ratings observed by E1 and E2 were 42.2 (SD = 11.5) and 46.5 (SD = 13.1), respectively. The average rating observed in the re-evaluation was 43.4 (SD = 14.2). Cronbach's Alpha showed a rating of 0.972 and the correlation of ratings between E1 and E2, and E1 and the re-evaluation, were higher than 0.9.

Conclusion

The Spanish version of MAPS-mini has adequate metric properties for assessing the walkability of urban environments using measurements at street level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将行人街景微观审计迷你地图(Maps-mini-Es)改编成西班牙语并进行可靠性分析
导言近来,我们目睹了人口增长和城市化的趋势。步行能力是一个基于物理环境特征的指标,用于确定环境条件与健康行为之间的关联。由此看来,评估步行能力有助于制定改善健康行为和人口健康的策略。在这项研究中,我们的目的是改编和评估西班牙语版 MAPS-Mini 的度量特性,以评估步行能力。随后,为了评估西班牙语版 MAPS-Mini 的可靠性,两名评分员(E1 和 E2)在街道层面对方便选出的 93 个路段进行了独立使用。四周后,E1 从 93 个评估路段中随机抽取 50 个路段进行重新评估(再评估)。对观察者之间的可靠性和时间稳定性进行了评估。结果 MAPS-mini 的原始版本和西班牙语版本之间没有发现重大差异。E1 和 E2 观察到的平均评分分别为 42.2(SD = 11.5)和 46.5(SD = 13.1)。在重新评估中观察到的平均评分为 43.4(标准差 = 14.2)。Cronbach's Alpha 显示评分为 0.972,E1 和 E2 之间以及 E1 和重新评估之间的评分相关性均高于 0.9。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Association between the risk of aberrant driving behavior and sleep disorder indices: A pilot study involving urban taxi drivers Driver vehicle crashes and mental health challenges among commuter college students The biosocial health of U.S. long haul truckers: Syndemics of the road Examining healthcare access with physical vs. telehealth options: Promise and peril for socially vulnerable older adults Physical activity and muscle activity of riding electric scooters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1