Acidification in cement paste in which clinker is partially replaced with limestone or silica

Feyza Nur Sahan, O. Burkan Isgor, W. Jason Weiss
{"title":"Acidification in cement paste in which clinker is partially replaced with limestone or silica","authors":"Feyza Nur Sahan,&nbsp;O. Burkan Isgor,&nbsp;W. Jason Weiss","doi":"10.1016/j.cement.2024.100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the acid resistance of cement pastes where a portion of the cement clinker is replaced with limestone (LS or calcium carbonate, CaCO<sub>3</sub>) or ground silica (GS). Specifically, the work is intended to better understand the acid resistance of ASTM C595 IL cement as compared with ASTM C150 cement. The performance of OPC, OPC + GS, and OPC + LS systems were tested in sulfuric acid baths where the pH was held constant at 2.0 and 3.0 using an automated setup that uses titration to add acid. The degradation of the cement paste was measured as a function of time. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to quantify changes in the calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub>) and calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) contents of the paste. In addition, the flexural strength of the cement paste specimens was measured. Results indicate that the dissolved sulfate and calcium concentrations due to acidification were not noticeably different for the OPC + GS and OPC + LS mixtures exposed to the same pH. However, as expected, differences were observed between the samples immersed in the solution of pH∼2 and pH∼3 sulfuric acid with the lower pH corresponding to more severe deterioration. TGA results showed that Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> is more susceptible to acid attack than limestone as evidenced by the larger Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> and sulfuric acid consumption in samples immersed at pH∼2. The additional acid consumption that is beyond the consumption of Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> can be explained by the acid attack of other hydration products such as C<img>S<img>H and unreacted cement phases. This results in a significant B3B flexural strength loss for the samples immersed in a pH∼2 as compared to those in the pH∼3 solution. The results demonstrated that the performance of ASTM C595 IL cements was promising and comparable with ASTM C150 cements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100225,"journal":{"name":"CEMENT","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666549224000124/pdfft?md5=2af6f2e52b93013e8de1890a5f9b6983&pid=1-s2.0-S2666549224000124-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666549224000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the acid resistance of cement pastes where a portion of the cement clinker is replaced with limestone (LS or calcium carbonate, CaCO3) or ground silica (GS). Specifically, the work is intended to better understand the acid resistance of ASTM C595 IL cement as compared with ASTM C150 cement. The performance of OPC, OPC + GS, and OPC + LS systems were tested in sulfuric acid baths where the pH was held constant at 2.0 and 3.0 using an automated setup that uses titration to add acid. The degradation of the cement paste was measured as a function of time. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to quantify changes in the calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) and calcium carbonate (CaCO3) contents of the paste. In addition, the flexural strength of the cement paste specimens was measured. Results indicate that the dissolved sulfate and calcium concentrations due to acidification were not noticeably different for the OPC + GS and OPC + LS mixtures exposed to the same pH. However, as expected, differences were observed between the samples immersed in the solution of pH∼2 and pH∼3 sulfuric acid with the lower pH corresponding to more severe deterioration. TGA results showed that Ca(OH)2 is more susceptible to acid attack than limestone as evidenced by the larger Ca(OH)2 and sulfuric acid consumption in samples immersed at pH∼2. The additional acid consumption that is beyond the consumption of Ca(OH)2 can be explained by the acid attack of other hydration products such as CSH and unreacted cement phases. This results in a significant B3B flexural strength loss for the samples immersed in a pH∼2 as compared to those in the pH∼3 solution. The results demonstrated that the performance of ASTM C595 IL cements was promising and comparable with ASTM C150 cements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
熟料部分被石灰石或二氧化硅替代的水泥浆中的酸化现象
本文研究了用石灰石(LS 或碳酸钙,CaCO3)或磨细硅石(GS)替代部分水泥熟料的水泥浆的耐酸性。具体来说,本文旨在更好地了解 ASTM C595 IL 水泥与 ASTM C150 水泥的耐酸性能。在硫酸浴中测试了 OPC、OPC + GS 和 OPC + LS 系统的性能,在硫酸浴中使用滴定加酸的自动装置将 pH 值恒定在 2.0 和 3.0。水泥浆的降解随时间变化而变化。热重分析(TGA)用于量化水泥浆中氢氧化钙(Ca(OH)2)和碳酸钙(CaCO3)含量的变化。此外,还测量了水泥浆试样的抗折强度。结果表明,对于暴露在相同 pH 值下的 OPC + GS 和 OPC + LS 混合物,酸化导致的溶解硫酸盐和钙浓度没有明显差异。然而,正如预期的那样,浸泡在 pH∼2 和 pH∼3 硫酸溶液中的样品之间存在差异,pH 值越低,劣化越严重。TGA 结果表明,与石灰石相比,Ca(OH)2 更容易受到酸的侵蚀,这从浸泡在 pH∼2 的样品中 Ca(OH)2 和硫酸消耗量较大可以看出。Ca(OH)2 消耗量之外的额外酸消耗量可解释为其他水化产物(如 CSH 和未反应的水泥相)的酸侵蚀。这导致浸泡在 pH∼2 溶液中的试样与浸泡在 pH∼3 溶液中的试样相比,B3B 抗折强度明显下降。结果表明,ASTM C595 IL 水泥的性能良好,可与 ASTM C150 水泥媲美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Downstream processing of End-of-Life concrete for the recovery of high-quality cementitious fractions The impact of relative humidity on the nanoindentation relaxation in calcium silicate hydrates Low-grade fly ash in portland cement blends: A decoupling approach to evaluate reactivity and hydration effects Accelerating effect of low replacements of carbonaceous materials in cement paste and mortar Measuring concrete air-entraining admixture adsorption on coal ash using three-phase equilibrium and fluorescence-based methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1