Comparison of i-gel® and LMA® Supreme™ for Facilitating Fiberoptic Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Q3 Medicine AANA journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Ryan J Lefevre, Christina A Jelly, Cynthia Schmelz, Jeremy Bennett, Yaping Shi, Matthew Shotwell, Jeffrey Ford, Antonio Hernandez
{"title":"Comparison of i-gel® and LMA® Supreme™ for Facilitating Fiberoptic Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Trial.","authors":"Ryan J Lefevre, Christina A Jelly, Cynthia Schmelz, Jeremy Bennett, Yaping Shi, Matthew Shotwell, Jeffrey Ford, Antonio Hernandez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Supraglottic airway (SGA) is an alternative to endotracheal intubation, however endotracheal intubation is often essential. One method to convert from an SGA to an endotracheal tube (ETT) is utilizing the SGA as a conduit for fiberoptic-guided advancement of an Aintree catheter (airway exchange catheter), and exchange of the SGA for an ETT. In this prospective randomized study, we compared two SGA devices in facilitating this exchange. Subjects were randomized to receive either the i-gel® or LMA® Supreme™ SGA. The SGA was placed and an Aintree intubation catheter was inserted through the SGA over a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Next, the SGA was removed, leaving the Aintree within the trachea, and an ETT was placed over the Aintree catheter and advanced into the trachea. The i-gel group exhibited shorter time to successful intubation (median, 191 vs. 434 seconds; <i>P</i> = .002). The i-gel group also had fewer study subjects requiring more than one attempt for successful Aintree placement (33% vs. 75%, <i>P</i> = .02). The i-gel group showed superior laryngeal view score (LVS) (6 vs. 4; <i>P</i> = .003). The i-gel SGA achieved a faster time to successful intubation, higher rate of first attempt Aintree placement, and superior LVS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"92 3","pages":"197-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supraglottic airway (SGA) is an alternative to endotracheal intubation, however endotracheal intubation is often essential. One method to convert from an SGA to an endotracheal tube (ETT) is utilizing the SGA as a conduit for fiberoptic-guided advancement of an Aintree catheter (airway exchange catheter), and exchange of the SGA for an ETT. In this prospective randomized study, we compared two SGA devices in facilitating this exchange. Subjects were randomized to receive either the i-gel® or LMA® Supreme™ SGA. The SGA was placed and an Aintree intubation catheter was inserted through the SGA over a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Next, the SGA was removed, leaving the Aintree within the trachea, and an ETT was placed over the Aintree catheter and advanced into the trachea. The i-gel group exhibited shorter time to successful intubation (median, 191 vs. 434 seconds; P = .002). The i-gel group also had fewer study subjects requiring more than one attempt for successful Aintree placement (33% vs. 75%, P = .02). The i-gel group showed superior laryngeal view score (LVS) (6 vs. 4; P = .003). The i-gel SGA achieved a faster time to successful intubation, higher rate of first attempt Aintree placement, and superior LVS.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
i-gel® 和 LMA® Supreme™ 在促进纤维气管插管方面的比较:前瞻性随机试验。
声门上气道(SGA)是气管内插管的一种替代方法,但气管内插管往往是必不可少的。将 SGA 转换为气管内插管(ETT)的一种方法是利用 SGA 作为导管,在光纤引导下推进 Aintree 导管(气道交换导管),然后将 SGA 换成 ETT。在这项前瞻性随机研究中,我们比较了两种促进交换的 SGA 设备。受试者随机接受 i-gel® 或 LMA® Supreme™ SGA。放置 SGA 后,通过纤维支气管镜将 Aintree 插管导管插入 SGA。然后拔出 SGA,将 Aintree 导管留在气管内,将 ETT 置于 Aintree 导管上并推进气管。i-gel 组成功插管的时间更短(中位 191 秒对 434 秒;P = 0.002)。i-gel 组中需要多次尝试才能成功置入 Aintree 插管的受试者也更少(33% 对 75%,P = .02)。i-gel 组的喉视野评分 (LVS) 更高(6 分对 4 分;P = .003)。i-gel SGA 插管成功的时间更快,首次尝试安氏插管的成功率更高,LVS 更优。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AANA journal
AANA journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.
期刊最新文献
Calendar of Events. Educating the Next Generation of CRNAs. Implementing A Surgical Safety Checklist for In-Office Procedures. Optimizing Workplace Wellness for Nurse Anesthetists: Key Benefits to Consider When Choosing Employment. Sleep: Architecture, Deprivation, and Propofol-Induced Sleep.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1