An analysis of suicidal and self-injurious behavior reports with antiseizure medications in the FDA adverse event database

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsy Research Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107382
Mokshal H. Porwal , Abrahim N. Razzak , Vinay Kumar , Ahmed Z. Obeidat , Umesh Sharma
{"title":"An analysis of suicidal and self-injurious behavior reports with antiseizure medications in the FDA adverse event database","authors":"Mokshal H. Porwal ,&nbsp;Abrahim N. Razzak ,&nbsp;Vinay Kumar ,&nbsp;Ahmed Z. Obeidat ,&nbsp;Umesh Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pharmacovigilance systems such as the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), are established models for adverse event surveillance that may have been missed during clinical trials. We aimed to analyze twenty-five anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in FAERS to assess for increased reporting of suicidal and self-injurious behavior.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-five ASMs were analyzed: brivaracetam, cannabidiol, carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, diazepam, eslicarbazepine, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, phenobarbital, phenytoin, pregabalin, primidone, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, valproate, vigabatrin, zonisamide. Reports of “suicidal and self-injurious behavior” were collected from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2020, using OpenVigil 2.1 tool with indication as “Epilepsy”. Relative reporting ratio, proportional reporting ratio, and reporting odds ratio were calculated utilizing all other drug reports for epilepsy patients as a control.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant relative operating ratio, ROR (greater than 1, p&lt;0.05) were observed for diazepam (2.909), pregabalin (2.739), brivaracetam (2.462), gabapentin (2.185), clonazepam (1.649), zonisamide (1.462), lacosamide (1.333), and levetiracetam (1.286).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Of the 25 ASMs that were analyzed in this study, 4 (16%) were identified to have been linked with a likely true adverse event. These drugs included diazepam, brivaracetam, gabapenetin, and pregabalin. Although several limitations are present with the FAERS database, it is imperative to closely monitor patient comorbidities for increased risk of suicidality with the use of several ASMs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 107382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pharmacovigilance systems such as the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), are established models for adverse event surveillance that may have been missed during clinical trials. We aimed to analyze twenty-five anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in FAERS to assess for increased reporting of suicidal and self-injurious behavior.

Methods

Twenty-five ASMs were analyzed: brivaracetam, cannabidiol, carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, diazepam, eslicarbazepine, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, phenobarbital, phenytoin, pregabalin, primidone, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, valproate, vigabatrin, zonisamide. Reports of “suicidal and self-injurious behavior” were collected from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2020, using OpenVigil 2.1 tool with indication as “Epilepsy”. Relative reporting ratio, proportional reporting ratio, and reporting odds ratio were calculated utilizing all other drug reports for epilepsy patients as a control.

Results

Significant relative operating ratio, ROR (greater than 1, p<0.05) were observed for diazepam (2.909), pregabalin (2.739), brivaracetam (2.462), gabapentin (2.185), clonazepam (1.649), zonisamide (1.462), lacosamide (1.333), and levetiracetam (1.286).

Conclusions

Of the 25 ASMs that were analyzed in this study, 4 (16%) were identified to have been linked with a likely true adverse event. These drugs included diazepam, brivaracetam, gabapenetin, and pregabalin. Although several limitations are present with the FAERS database, it is imperative to closely monitor patient comorbidities for increased risk of suicidality with the use of several ASMs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对美国食品及药物管理局不良事件数据库中抗癫痫药物自杀和自伤行为报告的分析。
背景:药物警戒系统(如 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS))是监测临床试验中可能遗漏的不良事件的既定模式。我们旨在分析 FAERS 中的 25 种抗癫痫药物 (ASM),以评估自杀和自伤行为报告的增加情况:我们对 25 种抗癫痫药物进行了分析:brivaracetam, cannabidiol, carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, diazepam, eslicarbazepine, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam、奥卡西平、培南帕奈、苯巴比妥、苯妥英、普瑞巴林、普瑞米酮、鲁非那胺、司替潘托、噻加宾、托吡酯、丙戊酸钠、维加巴特林、唑尼沙胺。自 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日,使用 OpenVigil 2.1 工具收集 "自杀和自伤行为 "报告,适应症为 "癫痫"。以癫痫患者的所有其他药物报告为对照,计算了相对报告比、比例报告比和报告几率比:相对报告比 ROR(大于 1,pConclusions)显著:在本研究分析的 25 种 ASM 中,发现 4 种(16%)可能与真实的不良事件有关。这些药物包括地西泮、布利瓦西坦、加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林。虽然 FAERS 数据库存在一些局限性,但在使用多种 ASM 时,必须密切监测患者的合并症,以防增加自杀风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Cannabis use, sleep and mood disturbances among persons with epilepsy – A clinical and polysomnography study from a Canadian tertiary care epilepsy center Evaluating the late seizures of acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion via monitoring using continuous electroencephalogram Validation of hemispherectomy outcome prediction scale in treatment of medically intractable epilepsy MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers of response to modified Atkins diet in treatment of adults with drug-resistant epilepsy: A proof-of-concept study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1