Kimberly A. Shumate, Samantha N. Williams, Aashish B. Khatri, Vijaya Knight
{"title":"Addition of CD14 improves discrimination of lymphocytes in the TBNK phenotyping panel","authors":"Kimberly A. Shumate, Samantha N. Williams, Aashish B. Khatri, Vijaya Knight","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peripheral blood lymphocyte phenotyping panels typically include CD45 for discrimination of the lymphocyte population, and fluorophore-conjugated monoclonal antibodies to identify T, B, and Natural Killer (NK) cells. While CD45 combined with side scatter is generally sufficient to clearly distinguish lymphocytes from monocytes in the majority of peripheral blood samples, it is challenging to accurately gate lymphocytes in samples from patients with monocytosis or significant lymphopenia, or from very young infants. Addition of a monocyte marker to lymphocyte phenotyping panels for monocyte exclusion has previously been evaluated for improved discrimination of lymphocytes, albeit largely in healthy donor adult samples. Here we evaluate the effect of the addition of CD14 to a standard lymphocyte phenotyping panel on total lymphocyte, T, B, and NK cell percentages in a predominantly pediatric population of patients under evaluation chiefly for immunodeficiency, immune-depletion, or immune reconstitution. Addition of CD14 to the standard lymphocyte phenotyping improved discrimination of lymphocytes from monocytes, resulted in decreased NK cell percentages, likely because CD16+ and/or CD56+ monocytes were included in the CD56+CD16+ NK cell gate with conventional gating, and although less significant, resulted in an increased percentage of B cells, since relatively larger B cells were likely gated out by more restrictive light scatter gating used with the conventional gating approach. The change in NK and B cell percentages were more pronounced in samples from patients below a year of age, and in patients who were relatively lymphopenic. These data suggest that addition of CD14 to conventional lymphocyte phenotyping panels that utilize CD45 versus side scatter gating results in significant improvement in the accuracy of lymphocyte gating, and accurate quantification of NK and B cells particularly in samples from infants and lymphopenic individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":"106 5","pages":"347-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.b.22180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Peripheral blood lymphocyte phenotyping panels typically include CD45 for discrimination of the lymphocyte population, and fluorophore-conjugated monoclonal antibodies to identify T, B, and Natural Killer (NK) cells. While CD45 combined with side scatter is generally sufficient to clearly distinguish lymphocytes from monocytes in the majority of peripheral blood samples, it is challenging to accurately gate lymphocytes in samples from patients with monocytosis or significant lymphopenia, or from very young infants. Addition of a monocyte marker to lymphocyte phenotyping panels for monocyte exclusion has previously been evaluated for improved discrimination of lymphocytes, albeit largely in healthy donor adult samples. Here we evaluate the effect of the addition of CD14 to a standard lymphocyte phenotyping panel on total lymphocyte, T, B, and NK cell percentages in a predominantly pediatric population of patients under evaluation chiefly for immunodeficiency, immune-depletion, or immune reconstitution. Addition of CD14 to the standard lymphocyte phenotyping improved discrimination of lymphocytes from monocytes, resulted in decreased NK cell percentages, likely because CD16+ and/or CD56+ monocytes were included in the CD56+CD16+ NK cell gate with conventional gating, and although less significant, resulted in an increased percentage of B cells, since relatively larger B cells were likely gated out by more restrictive light scatter gating used with the conventional gating approach. The change in NK and B cell percentages were more pronounced in samples from patients below a year of age, and in patients who were relatively lymphopenic. These data suggest that addition of CD14 to conventional lymphocyte phenotyping panels that utilize CD45 versus side scatter gating results in significant improvement in the accuracy of lymphocyte gating, and accurate quantification of NK and B cells particularly in samples from infants and lymphopenic individuals.
外周血淋巴细胞表型检测板通常包括用于区分淋巴细胞群的 CD45 和用于识别 T、B 和自然杀伤(NK)细胞的荧光团结合单克隆抗体。虽然 CD45 与侧散射相结合通常足以清楚地区分大多数外周血样本中的淋巴细胞和单核细胞,但在单核细胞增多症或严重淋巴细胞减少症患者或年幼婴儿的样本中,要准确区分淋巴细胞却很困难。在淋巴细胞表型检测板中加入单核细胞标记物以排除单核细胞的方法曾被评估用于提高淋巴细胞的分辨能力,尽管主要是在健康的成人供体样本中。在这里,我们评估了在标准淋巴细胞表型分析中加入 CD14 对淋巴细胞总数、T、B 和 NK 细胞百分比的影响,这些患者主要是儿科患者,主要接受免疫缺陷、免疫耗竭或免疫重建评估。在标准淋巴细胞表型中加入 CD14 提高了淋巴细胞与单核细胞的区分度,降低了 NK 细胞的百分比,这可能是因为 CD16+ 和/或 CD56+ 单核细胞被纳入了传统分型方法的 CD56+CD16+ NK 细胞门中,虽然意义不大,但却提高了 B 细胞的百分比,因为在传统分型方法中,相对较大的 B 细胞可能被限制性更强的光散射分型方法分出。NK 和 B 细胞百分比的变化在一岁以下的患者样本和淋巴细胞相对较多的患者样本中更为明显。这些数据表明,在使用 CD45 与侧散射分型的传统淋巴细胞表型板中加入 CD14,可显著提高淋巴细胞分型的准确性,并能准确量化 NK 和 B 细胞,特别是在婴儿和淋巴变性者样本中。
期刊介绍:
Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry features original research reports, in-depth reviews and special issues that directly relate to and palpably impact clinical flow, mass and image-based cytometry. These may include clinical and translational investigations important in the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic management of patients. Thus, we welcome research papers from various disciplines related [but not limited to] hematopathologists, hematologists, immunologists and cell biologists with clinically relevant and innovative studies investigating individual-cell analytics and/or separations. In addition to the types of papers indicated above, we also welcome Letters to the Editor, describing case reports or important medical or technical topics relevant to our readership without the length and depth of a full original report.