Real-Life Achievements of MiniMed 780G Advanced Closed-Loop System in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: AWeSoMe Study Group Multicenter Prospective Trial.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1089/dia.2024.0148
Noah Gruber, Avigail Wittenberg, Avivit Brener, Shirli Abiri, Kineret Mazor-Aronovitch, Michal Yackobovitch-Gavan, Shay Averbuch, Tal Ben Ari, Noah Levek, Neriya Levran, Zohar Landau, Marianna Rachmiel, Orit Pinhas-Hamiel, Yael Lebenthal
{"title":"Real-Life Achievements of MiniMed 780G Advanced Closed-Loop System in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: AWeSoMe Study Group Multicenter Prospective Trial.","authors":"Noah Gruber, Avigail Wittenberg, Avivit Brener, Shirli Abiri, Kineret Mazor-Aronovitch, Michal Yackobovitch-Gavan, Shay Averbuch, Tal Ben Ari, Noah Levek, Neriya Levran, Zohar Landau, Marianna Rachmiel, Orit Pinhas-Hamiel, Yael Lebenthal","doi":"10.1089/dia.2024.0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> We assessed real-life glycemic outcomes and predictors of composite measures of optimal glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) during their initial 12 months of the MiniMed™ 780G use. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This prospective observational multicenter study collected demographic, clinical, and 2-week 780G system data at five time points. Optimal glycemic control was defined as a composite glycemic control (CGC) score requiring the attainment of four recommended continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) targets, as well as the glycemia risk index (GRI) of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia and composite CGM index (COGI). Outcome measures included longitudinal changes in multiple glycemic parameters and CGC, GRI, and COGI scores, as well as predictors of these optimal measures. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The cohort included 93 children, 43% girls, with a median age of 15.1 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12.9,17.0). A longitudinal analysis adjusted for age and socioeconomic index yielded a significant improvement in glycemic control for the entire cohort (<i>p</i><sub>time</sub> < 0.001) after the transition to 780G. The mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (SE) was 8.65% (0.12) at baseline and dropped by >1% after 1 year to 7.54% (0.14) (<i>p</i><sub>time</sub> < 0.001). Optimal glycemic control measures improved at 12 months post 780G; CGC improved by 5.6-fold (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and was attained by 24% of the participants, the GRI score improved by 10-fold (<i>P</i> = 0.009) and was achieved by 10% of them, and the COGI improved by 7.6-fold (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and was attained by 20% of them. Lower baseline HbA1c levels and increased adherence to Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL) usage were predictors of achieving optimal glycemic control. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The AHCL 780G system enhances glycemic control in children and adolescents with T1D, demonstrating improvements in HbA1c and CGM metrics, albeit most participants did not achieve optimal glycemic control. This highlights yet ongoing challenges in diabetes management, emphasizing the need for continued proactive efforts on the part of health care professionals, youth, and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"869-880"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We assessed real-life glycemic outcomes and predictors of composite measures of optimal glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) during their initial 12 months of the MiniMed™ 780G use. Methods: This prospective observational multicenter study collected demographic, clinical, and 2-week 780G system data at five time points. Optimal glycemic control was defined as a composite glycemic control (CGC) score requiring the attainment of four recommended continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) targets, as well as the glycemia risk index (GRI) of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia and composite CGM index (COGI). Outcome measures included longitudinal changes in multiple glycemic parameters and CGC, GRI, and COGI scores, as well as predictors of these optimal measures. Results: The cohort included 93 children, 43% girls, with a median age of 15.1 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12.9,17.0). A longitudinal analysis adjusted for age and socioeconomic index yielded a significant improvement in glycemic control for the entire cohort (ptime < 0.001) after the transition to 780G. The mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (SE) was 8.65% (0.12) at baseline and dropped by >1% after 1 year to 7.54% (0.14) (ptime < 0.001). Optimal glycemic control measures improved at 12 months post 780G; CGC improved by 5.6-fold (P < 0.001) and was attained by 24% of the participants, the GRI score improved by 10-fold (P = 0.009) and was achieved by 10% of them, and the COGI improved by 7.6-fold (P < 0.001) and was attained by 20% of them. Lower baseline HbA1c levels and increased adherence to Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL) usage were predictors of achieving optimal glycemic control. Conclusions: The AHCL 780G system enhances glycemic control in children and adolescents with T1D, demonstrating improvements in HbA1c and CGM metrics, albeit most participants did not achieve optimal glycemic control. This highlights yet ongoing challenges in diabetes management, emphasizing the need for continued proactive efforts on the part of health care professionals, youth, and caregivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MiniMed™ 780G 高级闭环系统在 1 型糖尿病青少年患者中的实际应用效果:AWeSoMe 研究小组多中心前瞻性试验。
背景:我们评估了 1 型糖尿病(T1D)儿童和青少年使用 MiniMed™ 780G 最初 12 个月的实际血糖结果和最佳血糖控制综合指标的预测因素:这项前瞻性多中心观察研究收集了五个时间点的人口统计学、临床和两周 780G 系统数据。最佳血糖控制被定义为综合血糖控制(CGC)得分,要求达到四个推荐的连续血糖监测(CGM)目标,以及低血糖和高血糖的血糖风险指数(GRI)和综合 CGM 指数(COGI)。结果测量包括多个血糖参数、CGC、GRI 和 COGI 分数的纵向变化,以及这些最佳测量的预测因素:队列包括 93 名儿童,其中 43% 为女孩,中位年龄为 15.1 岁 [IQR 12.9,17.0]。根据年龄和社会经济指数调整后进行的纵向分析显示,整个组群的血糖控制有了显著改善(PtimeConclusions:AHCL 780G 系统增强了患有 T1D 的儿童和青少年的血糖控制,显示出 HbA1c 和 CGM 指标的改善,尽管大多数参与者并未达到最佳血糖控制。这凸显了糖尿病管理中持续存在的挑战,强调了医疗保健专业人员、青少年和护理人员继续积极努力的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Blood Glucose Monitoring to Support a Carbohydrate-Restricted Nutrition Intervention in People with Type 2 Diabetes. Comparison of Computational Statistical Packages for the Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data with a Reference Software, "Ambulatory Glucose Profile," in Type 1 Diabetes. Effect of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Frequent Activity Breaks on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial. Evaluation of an Automated Priming Bolus for Improving Prandial Glucose Control in Full Closed Loop Delivery. Safe Options for the Treatment of Mothers and Babies with Pregestational Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1