Study of social awareness regarding body donations for scientific and educational purposes.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Folia morphologica Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.5603/fm.100032
Radosław Karaś, Tomasz Lepich, Krzysztof Starszak, Grzegorz Bajor
{"title":"Study of social awareness regarding body donations for scientific and educational purposes.","authors":"Radosław Karaś, Tomasz Lepich, Krzysztof Starszak, Grzegorz Bajor","doi":"10.5603/fm.100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The basis of teaching anatomy is the understanding of the body's structures using human cadavers. Body donation should be a fully conscious and voluntary act. There is a growing demand for human cadavers in medical universities. To meet these demands, it is necessary to understand the societal awareness regarding body donation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study utilized a proprietary single-choice questionnaire while maintaining the anonymity of the respondents. The study included 1004 individuals, comprising 700 women and 304 men. The analysis employed the Mann-Whitney test, Pearson's chi-squared test with calculation of the Cramer's V coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the respondents, 56.37% consider donating their bodies for scientific and educational purposes. Among the concerns associated with donation, fear of lack of proper respect for the remains by students (18.23%), family opposition (16.24%), and religious reasons (9.16%) were highlighted. Non-religious individuals are more inclined to donate their bodies for scientific and educational purposes than religious individuals (p < 0.001). Residents of rural areas and small towns are less likely to consider donating their bodies for scientific and educational purposes than residents of large cities (p = 0.002). As many as 85.76% of respondents believe that human remains are essential for effective anatomy education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing public awareness of cadaver donation may contribute to increasing the effectiveness of anatomy teaching at medical universities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12251,"journal":{"name":"Folia morphologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia morphologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.100032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The basis of teaching anatomy is the understanding of the body's structures using human cadavers. Body donation should be a fully conscious and voluntary act. There is a growing demand for human cadavers in medical universities. To meet these demands, it is necessary to understand the societal awareness regarding body donation.

Materials and methods: The study utilized a proprietary single-choice questionnaire while maintaining the anonymity of the respondents. The study included 1004 individuals, comprising 700 women and 304 men. The analysis employed the Mann-Whitney test, Pearson's chi-squared test with calculation of the Cramer's V coefficient.

Results: Among the respondents, 56.37% consider donating their bodies for scientific and educational purposes. Among the concerns associated with donation, fear of lack of proper respect for the remains by students (18.23%), family opposition (16.24%), and religious reasons (9.16%) were highlighted. Non-religious individuals are more inclined to donate their bodies for scientific and educational purposes than religious individuals (p < 0.001). Residents of rural areas and small towns are less likely to consider donating their bodies for scientific and educational purposes than residents of large cities (p = 0.002). As many as 85.76% of respondents believe that human remains are essential for effective anatomy education.

Conclusions: Increasing public awareness of cadaver donation may contribute to increasing the effectiveness of anatomy teaching at medical universities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为科学和教育目的研究有关遗体捐赠的社会意识。
背景:解剖学教学的基础是利用人体尸体了解人体结构。遗体捐献应该是一种完全自觉和自愿的行为。医科大学对人体尸体的需求日益增长。为满足这些需求,有必要了解社会对遗体捐献的认识:研究采用了专有的单项选择问卷,同时保持了受访者的匿名性。研究对象包括 1004 人,其中女性 700 人,男性 304 人。分析采用了曼-惠特尼检验、皮尔逊卡方检验,并计算了克拉默 V 系数:结果:在受访者中,56.37%的人认为捐献遗体是为了科学和教育目的。在捐献遗体的相关顾虑中,学生担心遗体得不到应有的尊重(18.23%)、家人反对(16.24%)和宗教原因(9.16%)是重点。与有宗教信仰的人相比,无宗教信仰的人更倾向于为科学和教育目的捐献遗体(p < 0.001)。与大城市居民相比,农村地区和小城镇居民不太可能考虑为科学和教育目的捐献遗体(p = 0.002)。多达 85.76% 的受访者认为遗体对于有效的解剖学教育至关重要:提高公众对遗体捐赠的认识有助于提高医科大学解剖学教学的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Folia morphologica
Folia morphologica ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Folia Morphologica" is an official journal of the Polish Anatomical Society (a Constituent Member of European Federation for Experimental Morphology - EFEM). It contains original articles and reviews on morphology in the broadest sense (descriptive, experimental, and methodological). Papers dealing with practical application of morphological research to clinical problems may also be considered. Full-length papers as well as short research notes can be submitted. Descriptive papers dealing with non-mammals, cannot be accepted for publication with some exception.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the efficacy of medial tarsal venous flaps and traditional venous/arterial free flaps in the reconstruction of hand soft tissue defects: a new type of physiological flap. A bilateral fetal origin of the posterior cerebral artery coexisting with an absent A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery. Anatomical study of brachial plexuses of a koala, a Tasmanian devil, and a common ringtail possum. Is there a sexual dimorphism in Wormian bones presence? A study on Polish and Lithuanian sample. Lower limb interosseous membrane in foetuses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1