Meta-analysis of genomic variants in power and endurance sports to decode the impact of genomics on athletic performance and success.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Human Genomics Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1186/s40246-024-00621-9
Aikaterini Psatha, Zeina N Al-Mahayri, Christina Mitropoulou, George P Patrinos
{"title":"Meta-analysis of genomic variants in power and endurance sports to decode the impact of genomics on athletic performance and success.","authors":"Aikaterini Psatha, Zeina N Al-Mahayri, Christina Mitropoulou, George P Patrinos","doi":"10.1186/s40246-024-00621-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Association between genomic variants and athletic performance has seen a high degree of controversy, as there is often conflicting data as far as the association of genomic variants with endurance, speed and strength is concerned. Here, findings from a thorough meta-analysis from 4228 articles exploring the association of genomic variants with athletic performance in power and endurance sports are summarized, aiming to confirm or overrule the association of genetic variants with athletic performance of all types. From the 4228 articles, only 107 were eligible for further analysis, including 37 different genes. From these, there were 21 articles for the ACE gene, 29 articles for the ACTN3 gene and 8 articles for both the ACE and ACTN3 genes, including 54,382 subjects in total, from which 11,501 were endurance and power athletes and 42,881 control subjects. These data show that there is no statistically significant association between genomic variants and athletic performance either for endurance or power sports, underlying the fact that it is highly risky and even unethical to make such genetic testing services for athletic performance available to the general public. Overall, a strict regulatory monitoring should be exercised by health and other legislative authorities to protect the public from such services from an emerging discipline that still lacks the necessary scientific evidence and subsequent regulatory approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":13183,"journal":{"name":"Human Genomics","volume":"18 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-024-00621-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Association between genomic variants and athletic performance has seen a high degree of controversy, as there is often conflicting data as far as the association of genomic variants with endurance, speed and strength is concerned. Here, findings from a thorough meta-analysis from 4228 articles exploring the association of genomic variants with athletic performance in power and endurance sports are summarized, aiming to confirm or overrule the association of genetic variants with athletic performance of all types. From the 4228 articles, only 107 were eligible for further analysis, including 37 different genes. From these, there were 21 articles for the ACE gene, 29 articles for the ACTN3 gene and 8 articles for both the ACE and ACTN3 genes, including 54,382 subjects in total, from which 11,501 were endurance and power athletes and 42,881 control subjects. These data show that there is no statistically significant association between genomic variants and athletic performance either for endurance or power sports, underlying the fact that it is highly risky and even unethical to make such genetic testing services for athletic performance available to the general public. Overall, a strict regulatory monitoring should be exercised by health and other legislative authorities to protect the public from such services from an emerging discipline that still lacks the necessary scientific evidence and subsequent regulatory approval.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对力量和耐力运动基因组变异进行元分析,解读基因组学对运动成绩和成功的影响。
基因组变异与运动成绩之间的关系一直存在很大争议,因为就基因组变异与耐力、速度和力量的关系而言,往往存在相互矛盾的数据。在此,我们总结了从 4228 篇探讨基因组变异与力量和耐力运动表现相关性的文章中得出的全面荟萃分析结果,旨在证实或推翻基因变异与各类运动表现的相关性。在 4228 篇文章中,只有 107 篇符合进一步分析的条件,包括 37 个不同的基因。其中,21 篇文章涉及 ACE 基因,29 篇文章涉及 ACTN3 基因,8 篇文章同时涉及 ACE 和 ACTN3 基因,共包括 54,382 名受试者,其中 11,501 人为耐力和力量型运动员,42,881 人为对照组受试者。这些数据表明,无论是耐力运动还是力量运动,基因组变异与运动成绩之间都不存在统计学意义上的显著关联,这就说明向普通大众提供此类运动成绩基因检测服务具有很高的风险,甚至是不道德的。总之,卫生部门和其他立法部门应实行严格的监管,以保护公众免受这门新兴学科提供的此类服务的影响,因为该学科仍缺乏必要的科学证据和随后的监管批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Genomics
Human Genomics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Genomics is a peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that focuses on the application of genomic analysis in all aspects of human health and disease, as well as genomic analysis of drug efficacy and safety, and comparative genomics. Topics covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: pharmacogenomics, genome-wide association studies, genome-wide sequencing, exome sequencing, next-generation deep-sequencing, functional genomics, epigenomics, translational genomics, expression profiling, proteomics, bioinformatics, animal models, statistical genetics, genetic epidemiology, human population genetics and comparative genomics.
期刊最新文献
Long-read sequencing enables comprehensive molecular genetic diagnosis of Fabry disease. Integration of single-cell sequencing and drug sensitivity profiling reveals an 11-gene prognostic model for liver cancer. SCAN: a nanopore-based, cost effective decision-supporting tool for mass screening of aneuploidies. Advancing understanding of human variability through toxicokinetic modeling, in vitro-in vivo extrapolation, and new approach methodologies. Genetic heterogeneity in familial forms of genetic generalized epilepsy: from mono- to oligogenism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1