Evaluation of Prosthesis Satisfaction, Psychological Status, and Quality of Life in Lower-Extremity Amputee Patients: A Pilot Study.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.7547/22-154
Zeynep Kirac Unal, Damla Cankurtaran, Ece Unlu Akyuz
{"title":"Evaluation of Prosthesis Satisfaction, Psychological Status, and Quality of Life in Lower-Extremity Amputee Patients: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Zeynep Kirac Unal, Damla Cankurtaran, Ece Unlu Akyuz","doi":"10.7547/22-154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are various factors affecting the use of prostheses. This study was aimed to examine satisfaction, psychological state, quality of life, and the factors affecting these in individuals who use prostheses because of lower-extremity amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-three patients were included in this study. Demographic data and features related amputation and prosthesis were recorded. Quality of life was evaluated with the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), anxiety and depression levels were evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), body image was evaluated by the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS), prosthesis satisfaction was evaluated with the Prosthesis Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), and the relationship between them was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a positive correlation between all HADS scores, NHP-emotional reactions, NHP-sleep, NHP-social isolation, NHP-total, and ABIS (P < .05). A negative correlation was found between HADS-anxiety and PSQ results (r = -0.394, P = .003). A positive correlation was found between HADS-depression scores and NHP-pain, NHP-emotional reactions, NHP-social isolation, NHP-total, and ABIS (P < .05); and a negative correlation was found with PSQ questionnaire scores (r = -0.427, P = .001). There was a positive correlation between HADS-total scores and all parameters except NHP-energy level and ABIS (P < .05). A positive correlation was found between ABIS and all parameters except NHP-energy level (P < .05). A negative correlation was found between PSQ and NHP-social isolation, NHP-physical activity, and NHP-total scores (r = -0.312, P = 0.019; r = -0.312, P = .019; and r = -0.277, P = .039, respectively). The presence of residual extremity pain was found to be an effective factor on the psychological state (β = 0.429, P = .001). The presence of residual limb pain and phantom pain were found to be effective factors on the prosthesis satisfaction (β = -0.41, P = .001; and β = -0.406, P = .001, respectively). The presence of residual extremity pain and anxiety level were found independent risk factors on the NHP (β = -0.401, P = .006; and β = -0.445, P = .006, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals using prostheses because of lower-extremity amputation should be examined in detail from various perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/22-154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are various factors affecting the use of prostheses. This study was aimed to examine satisfaction, psychological state, quality of life, and the factors affecting these in individuals who use prostheses because of lower-extremity amputation.

Methods: Sixty-three patients were included in this study. Demographic data and features related amputation and prosthesis were recorded. Quality of life was evaluated with the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), anxiety and depression levels were evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), body image was evaluated by the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS), prosthesis satisfaction was evaluated with the Prosthesis Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), and the relationship between them was examined.

Results: There was a positive correlation between all HADS scores, NHP-emotional reactions, NHP-sleep, NHP-social isolation, NHP-total, and ABIS (P < .05). A negative correlation was found between HADS-anxiety and PSQ results (r = -0.394, P = .003). A positive correlation was found between HADS-depression scores and NHP-pain, NHP-emotional reactions, NHP-social isolation, NHP-total, and ABIS (P < .05); and a negative correlation was found with PSQ questionnaire scores (r = -0.427, P = .001). There was a positive correlation between HADS-total scores and all parameters except NHP-energy level and ABIS (P < .05). A positive correlation was found between ABIS and all parameters except NHP-energy level (P < .05). A negative correlation was found between PSQ and NHP-social isolation, NHP-physical activity, and NHP-total scores (r = -0.312, P = 0.019; r = -0.312, P = .019; and r = -0.277, P = .039, respectively). The presence of residual extremity pain was found to be an effective factor on the psychological state (β = 0.429, P = .001). The presence of residual limb pain and phantom pain were found to be effective factors on the prosthesis satisfaction (β = -0.41, P = .001; and β = -0.406, P = .001, respectively). The presence of residual extremity pain and anxiety level were found independent risk factors on the NHP (β = -0.401, P = .006; and β = -0.445, P = .006, respectively).

Conclusions: Individuals using prostheses because of lower-extremity amputation should be examined in detail from various perspectives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估下肢截肢患者对假肢的满意度、心理状态和生活质量:一项试点研究
背景:影响假肢使用的因素有很多。本研究旨在探讨因下肢截肢而使用假肢的患者的满意度、心理状态、生活质量及其影响因素:本研究共纳入 63 名患者。方法:本研究共纳入 63 名患者,记录了他们的人口统计学数据以及与截肢和假肢相关的特征。用诺丁汉健康档案(NHP)评估生活质量,用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估焦虑和抑郁水平,用截肢者身体形象量表(ABIS)评估身体形象,用假肢满意度问卷(PSQ)评估假肢满意度,并研究它们之间的关系:结果:所有 HADS 分数、NHP-情绪反应、NHP-睡眠、NHP-社会隔离、NHP-总分和 ABIS 之间均呈正相关(P < .05)。HADS-焦虑与 PSQ 结果之间呈负相关(r = -0.394,P = .003)。HADS-抑郁得分与 NHP-疼痛、NHP-情绪反应、NHP-社会隔离、NHP-总分和 ABIS 之间呈正相关(P < .05);与 PSQ 问卷得分呈负相关(r = -0.427,P = .001)。除 NHP 能量水平和 ABIS 外,HADS 总分与所有参数均呈正相关(P < .05)。ABIS 与除 NHP 能量水平以外的所有参数之间均呈正相关(P < .05)。PSQ 与 NHP-社会隔离、NHP-体力活动和 NHP-总分之间呈负相关(r = -0.312,P = 0.019;r = -0.312,P = 0.019;r = -0.277,P = 0.039)。残肢疼痛是影响心理状态的有效因素(β = 0.429,P = .001)。残肢痛和幻肢痛是影响假肢满意度的有效因素(β = -0.41,P = .001;β = -0.406,P = .001)。残余肢体疼痛和焦虑程度是影响 NHP 的独立风险因素(β = -0.401,P = .006;β = -0.445,P = .006):结论:对于因下肢截肢而使用假肢的人,应从多个角度进行详细研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
期刊最新文献
Pedal Vessel Calcification and Risk of Major Adverse Foot Events in the Diabetic Neuropathic, Nephropathic Foot. Physical Therapy Management for a Patient with Hallux Rigidus in a Baseball Player. The Impact of Postural and Anthropometric Properties of Foot and Ankle on Physical Performance and Ambulation of Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Theory of Biomechanical Evolution of the Rheumatoid Foot: A Narrative Review. Body Mass and Foot-dominance Disparities in the Foot Plantar Pressure Parameters of Older Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1