Patent foramen ovale closure in ischemic stroke patients with and without thrombophilia: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1007/s11239-024-02990-3
Xue Yang Lim, Nicholas Lx Gao, Wynne Yu Lee, Jia Hui Neo, Alethea He Tan, Ching-Hui Sia, Vijay K Sharma, Leonard Ll Yeo, Yinghao Lim, Chee Yen Lin, Jamie Sin Ying Ho, Benjamin Yq Tan
{"title":"Patent foramen ovale closure in ischemic stroke patients with and without thrombophilia: a systematic review and meta-analyses.","authors":"Xue Yang Lim, Nicholas Lx Gao, Wynne Yu Lee, Jia Hui Neo, Alethea He Tan, Ching-Hui Sia, Vijay K Sharma, Leonard Ll Yeo, Yinghao Lim, Chee Yen Lin, Jamie Sin Ying Ho, Benjamin Yq Tan","doi":"10.1007/s11239-024-02990-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ischemic stroke patients with thrombophilia and patient foramen ovale (PFO) may have an increased risk of recurrent stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), and may benefit from PFO closure. However, screening for thrombophilia is not routinely performed and the impact of thrombophilia on prognosis after PFO closure is uncertain. We aim to compare the risk of recurrent stroke and TIA after PFO closure in patients with thrombophilia versus those without. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses of the literature, with a comprehensive literature search performed on 12 January 2023. Studies comparing the outcomes of patients with and without thrombophilia after PFO closure were included. The primary outcome evaluated was a recurrence of acute cerebrovascular event (ACE), a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke and recurrent TIA. The secondary outcomes included recurrent ischemic stroke only or TIA only. A total of 8 cohort studies were included, with a total of 3514 patients. There was an increased risk of stroke/TIA in patients with thrombophilia compared to those without thrombophilia after PFO (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.01-1.99, I<sup>2</sup> = 50%). The association between risk of TIA only (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.77-2.41, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and stroke only (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.54-2.21, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) with thrombophilia did not reach statistical significance. There is an increased risk of recurrent cerebral ischemia event in patients with thrombophilia compared to those without thrombophilia after PFO closure. Future large prospective studies are necessary to characterise the risk and benefits of PFO closure, as well as the appropriate medical treatment to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and TIA in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":"947-958"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02990-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ischemic stroke patients with thrombophilia and patient foramen ovale (PFO) may have an increased risk of recurrent stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), and may benefit from PFO closure. However, screening for thrombophilia is not routinely performed and the impact of thrombophilia on prognosis after PFO closure is uncertain. We aim to compare the risk of recurrent stroke and TIA after PFO closure in patients with thrombophilia versus those without. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses of the literature, with a comprehensive literature search performed on 12 January 2023. Studies comparing the outcomes of patients with and without thrombophilia after PFO closure were included. The primary outcome evaluated was a recurrence of acute cerebrovascular event (ACE), a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke and recurrent TIA. The secondary outcomes included recurrent ischemic stroke only or TIA only. A total of 8 cohort studies were included, with a total of 3514 patients. There was an increased risk of stroke/TIA in patients with thrombophilia compared to those without thrombophilia after PFO (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.01-1.99, I2 = 50%). The association between risk of TIA only (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.77-2.41, I2 = 0%) and stroke only (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.54-2.21, I2 = 0%) with thrombophilia did not reach statistical significance. There is an increased risk of recurrent cerebral ischemia event in patients with thrombophilia compared to those without thrombophilia after PFO closure. Future large prospective studies are necessary to characterise the risk and benefits of PFO closure, as well as the appropriate medical treatment to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and TIA in this high-risk population.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有血栓性疾病和无血栓性疾病缺血性脑卒中患者的卵圆孔关闭术:系统综述和荟萃分析。
患有血栓性疾病和卵圆孔(PFO)患者的缺血性卒中患者复发卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的风险可能会增加,并可能从 PFO 关闭术中获益。然而,血栓性疾病筛查并非常规,血栓性疾病对 PFO 关闭术后预后的影响也不确定。我们旨在比较血栓性疾病患者与非血栓性疾病患者在 PFO 关闭术后复发中风和 TIA 的风险。我们对文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,并于 2023 年 1 月 12 日进行了全面的文献检索。纳入的研究比较了血栓性疾病患者和非血栓性疾病患者在 PFO 关闭术后的治疗效果。评估的主要结果是急性脑血管事件(ACE)的复发,即复发缺血性中风和复发 TIA 的综合结果。次要结果包括仅复发缺血性卒中或仅 TIA。共纳入 8 项队列研究,患者总数为 3514 人。与无血栓性疾病的患者相比,有血栓性疾病的患者在 PFO 后发生卒中/TIA 的风险增加(OR:1.42,95% CI:1.01-1.99,I2 = 50%)。仅 TIA 风险(OR:1.36,95% CI:0.77-2.41,I2 = 0%)和仅卒中风险(OR:1.09,95% CI:0.54-2.21,I2 = 0%)与血栓性疾病之间的关系未达到统计学意义。与无血栓性疾病的患者相比,有血栓性疾病的患者在关闭 PFO 后复发脑缺血事件的风险增加。今后有必要开展大型前瞻性研究,以确定 PFO 关闭术的风险和益处,并确定适当的医疗方法,以降低这一高风险人群的复发性中风和 TIA 风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
期刊最新文献
Factor XI as a new target for prevention of thromboembolism in cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation in relation to multimorbidity status changes over time and the impact of ABC pathway compliance: a nationwide cohort study. Clot lysis time and thrombin generation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Ghrelin may protect against vascular endothelial injury in Acute traumatic coagulopathy by mediating the RhoA/ROCK/MLC2 pathway. The COVID-19 thrombus: distinguishing pathological, mechanistic, and phenotypic features and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1