Differences in clinical outcomes between men with mosaic Klinefelter syndrome and those with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive Medicine and Biology Pub Date : 2024-05-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1002/rmb2.12579
Juri Tsukamoto, Noritoshi Enatsu, Eri Nakahara, Kohyu Furuhashi, Koji Chiba, Yihsien Enatsu, Yuri Mizusawa, Eri Okamoto, Shoji Kokeguchi, Masahide Shiotani
{"title":"Differences in clinical outcomes between men with mosaic Klinefelter syndrome and those with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome.","authors":"Juri Tsukamoto, Noritoshi Enatsu, Eri Nakahara, Kohyu Furuhashi, Koji Chiba, Yihsien Enatsu, Yuri Mizusawa, Eri Okamoto, Shoji Kokeguchi, Masahide Shiotani","doi":"10.1002/rmb2.12579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared the clinical outcomes of men with Klinfelter syndrome based on karyotype.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors analyzed the outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) performed on 57 patients with Klinfelter syndrome (KS) at our clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average ages of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups were 32.2 ± 4.8 and 45.9 ± 13.1 years, respectively. The sperm retrieval rates of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups were 46.5% (20/43) and 50.0% (7/14), respectively. The fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection did not significantly differ between the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups. The mosaic KS group had higher cleavage and blastocyst development rates than the non-mosaic KS group (72.2% vs. 96.2% and 30.5% vs. 44.7%, respectively). The group using motile sperm had better outcomes than the group using immotile sperm. The embryo transfer outcomes of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups did not significantly differ (clinical pregnancy rate: 28.0% vs. 20.7%, miscarriage rate: 14.3% vs. 33.3%, production rate per transfer: 22.0% vs. 13.8%, and production rate per case: 58.8% vs. 57.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the non-mosaic KS group, the mosaic KS group had significantly better intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes because of the higher utilization rate of motile sperm.</p>","PeriodicalId":21116,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":"e12579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11097125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12579","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the clinical outcomes of men with Klinfelter syndrome based on karyotype.

Methods: The authors analyzed the outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) performed on 57 patients with Klinfelter syndrome (KS) at our clinic.

Results: The average ages of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups were 32.2 ± 4.8 and 45.9 ± 13.1 years, respectively. The sperm retrieval rates of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups were 46.5% (20/43) and 50.0% (7/14), respectively. The fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection did not significantly differ between the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups. The mosaic KS group had higher cleavage and blastocyst development rates than the non-mosaic KS group (72.2% vs. 96.2% and 30.5% vs. 44.7%, respectively). The group using motile sperm had better outcomes than the group using immotile sperm. The embryo transfer outcomes of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups did not significantly differ (clinical pregnancy rate: 28.0% vs. 20.7%, miscarriage rate: 14.3% vs. 33.3%, production rate per transfer: 22.0% vs. 13.8%, and production rate per case: 58.8% vs. 57.1%).

Conclusions: Compared with the non-mosaic KS group, the mosaic KS group had significantly better intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes because of the higher utilization rate of motile sperm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有镶嵌型 Klinefelter 综合征和非镶嵌型 Klinefelter 综合征的男性在临床结果上的差异。
目的:本研究根据核型对克林费尔特综合征男性患者的临床结果进行了比较:作者分析了本诊所对 57 名 Klinfelter 综合征(KS)患者进行显微解剖睾丸取精术(micro-TESE)的结果:结果:非镶嵌型和镶嵌型KS患者的平均年龄分别为(32.2 ± 4.8)岁和(45.9 ± 13.1)岁。非马赛克和马赛克 KS 组的取精率分别为 46.5%(20/43)和 50.0%(7/14)。卵胞浆内单精子注射后的受精率在非马赛克型和马赛克型KS组之间没有显著差异。镶嵌式 KS 组的卵裂率和囊胚发育率高于非镶嵌式 KS 组(分别为 72.2% 对 96.2% 和 30.5% 对 44.7%)。使用有活力精子的组比使用无活力精子的组结果更好。非镶嵌型 KS 组和镶嵌型 KS 组的胚胎移植结果没有显著差异(临床妊娠率:28.0% 对 20.7%,流产率:14.3% 对 33%):14.3% vs. 33.3%,每次移植的生产率:22.0% vs. 13.8%,每例生产率:58.8% vs. 57.1%:结论:结论:与非镶嵌型 KS 组相比,镶嵌型 KS 组的卵胞浆内单精子注射结果要好得多,因为活力精子的利用率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Medicine and Biology (RMB) is the official English journal of the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation, the Japan Society of Andrology, and publishes original research articles that report new findings or concepts in all aspects of reproductive phenomena in all kinds of mammals. Papers in any of the following fields will be considered: andrology, endocrinology, oncology, immunology, genetics, function of gonads and genital tracts, erectile dysfunction, gametogenesis, function of accessory sex organs, fertilization, embryogenesis, embryo manipulation, pregnancy, implantation, ontogenesis, infectious disease, contraception, etc.
期刊最新文献
Activation of motility and chemotaxis in the spermatozoa. NR5A1 and cell population heterogeneity: Insights into developmental and functional disparities and regulatory mechanisms. The physiological role of macrophages in reproductive organs. Uterus transplantation: A clinical breakthrough after systematic preclinical research. Revisiting non-obstructive azoospermia: Is there a best way to retrieve testicular sperm?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1