Pharmacists’ clinical decision making when responding to a self-medication request for a cough in a developing country

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.05.004
{"title":"Pharmacists’ clinical decision making when responding to a self-medication request for a cough in a developing country","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Some studies have reported that community pharmacies in developing countries, including Indonesia, provided sub-optimal advice when handling patient's self-medication request for </span>cough. The reasons behind such advice, therefore, need to be investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe Indonesian pharmacists’ clinical decision making when handling self-medication cases for a cough.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An open-ended questionnaire consisting of two cough clinical vignettes (case 1: cough due to asthma worsening and case 2: cough as a symptom of common cold) were developed. Pharmacists were interviewed to provide recommendations and reasons for their recommendations for these scenarios. Content analysis was used to analyse participants’ statements for the two scenarios. The number of participants who provided appropriate recommendations and reasons were then counted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 245 community pharmacists participated in the study. In the case of cough due to asthma worsening, recommending a product because the product was indicated to help with the symptoms was the most common recommendation and stated reason (40%). Appropriate recommendation (direct medical referral) with appropriate reasoning (indicating warning symptoms and/or making a symptom diagnosis) was provided by 25% participants. In the case of cough as a symptom of common cold, recommending products to help with the symptoms was also the most common recommendation and stated reason (53%). Appropriate recommendations (recommending product) with appropriate reasoning (providing product to treat the symptoms and/or indicating no warning symptoms and/or making a symptom diagnosis) was provided by 81% participants.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The ability of Indonesian community pharmacists to provide appropriate recommendations for cough self-medication requests is dependent on whether triage is required. The inability of most community pharmacists to differentiate between major and minor conditions may lead to serious health implications for patients and therefore educational interventions should be undertaken to improve community pharmacists’ differential diagnostic skills for triage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124001736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Some studies have reported that community pharmacies in developing countries, including Indonesia, provided sub-optimal advice when handling patient's self-medication request for cough. The reasons behind such advice, therefore, need to be investigated.

Objectives

To describe Indonesian pharmacists’ clinical decision making when handling self-medication cases for a cough.

Methods

An open-ended questionnaire consisting of two cough clinical vignettes (case 1: cough due to asthma worsening and case 2: cough as a symptom of common cold) were developed. Pharmacists were interviewed to provide recommendations and reasons for their recommendations for these scenarios. Content analysis was used to analyse participants’ statements for the two scenarios. The number of participants who provided appropriate recommendations and reasons were then counted.

Results

A total of 245 community pharmacists participated in the study. In the case of cough due to asthma worsening, recommending a product because the product was indicated to help with the symptoms was the most common recommendation and stated reason (40%). Appropriate recommendation (direct medical referral) with appropriate reasoning (indicating warning symptoms and/or making a symptom diagnosis) was provided by 25% participants. In the case of cough as a symptom of common cold, recommending products to help with the symptoms was also the most common recommendation and stated reason (53%). Appropriate recommendations (recommending product) with appropriate reasoning (providing product to treat the symptoms and/or indicating no warning symptoms and/or making a symptom diagnosis) was provided by 81% participants.

Conclusion

The ability of Indonesian community pharmacists to provide appropriate recommendations for cough self-medication requests is dependent on whether triage is required. The inability of most community pharmacists to differentiate between major and minor conditions may lead to serious health implications for patients and therefore educational interventions should be undertaken to improve community pharmacists’ differential diagnostic skills for triage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在发展中国家,药剂师在应对咳嗽患者自行用药请求时的临床决策。
背景:一些研究报告指出,发展中国家(包括印度尼西亚)的社区药房在处理患者因咳嗽而提出的自我药疗请求时,提供的建议不够理想。因此,需要对这些建议背后的原因进行调查:描述印尼药剂师在处理咳嗽患者自行用药时的临床决策:方法:编制了一份开放式问卷,其中包括两个咳嗽临床案例(案例 1:哮喘恶化引起的咳嗽和案例 2:普通感冒症状引起的咳嗽)。药剂师接受了访谈,就这些情景提出了建议和建议的理由。内容分析法用于分析参与者对这两种情景的陈述。然后统计了提供适当建议和理由的参与者人数:共有 245 名社区药剂师参与了研究。在哮喘恶化导致咳嗽的情况下,最常见的建议和陈述的理由是推荐一种产品,因为该产品有助于缓解症状(40%)。25%的参与者提供了适当的建议(直接转诊)和适当的理由(指出警告症状和/或进行症状诊断)。对于作为普通感冒症状的咳嗽,推荐产品以帮助缓解症状也是最常见的建议和陈述的理由 (53%)。81%的参与者提供了适当的建议(推荐产品)和适当的理由(提供产品治疗症状和/或指出无预警症状和/或进行症状诊断):印尼社区药剂师为咳嗽自我药疗请求提供适当建议的能力取决于是否需要分诊。大多数社区药剂师无法区分大病和小病,这可能会对患者的健康造成严重影响,因此应采取教育干预措施,提高社区药剂师的分诊技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
期刊最新文献
The association between patient self-reported experiences with medication discharge counselling and hospital readmissions: A cross-sectional analysis of a population-based survey. Enhancing older Veterans' care: Insights from medication reviews and deprescribing interventions. Development and evaluation of a model to identify publications on the clinical impact of pharmacist interventions. A graphical model to make explicit pharmacist clinical reasoning during medication review. Developing and validating development goals towards transforming a global framework for pharmacy practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1