Incorporating the Distress Thermometer into preoperative vital signs in patients undergoing ambulatory oncology surgery: a pilot feasibility study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1080/07347332.2024.2351038
Jennifer Ross Majumdar, Melissa Assel, Aimee Dannaoui, Alexandria Fatata-Haim, Jillian Fromkin, Christian Nelson, Vincent Laudone, Sigrid V Carlsson
{"title":"Incorporating the Distress Thermometer into preoperative vital signs in patients undergoing ambulatory oncology surgery: a pilot feasibility study.","authors":"Jennifer Ross Majumdar, Melissa Assel, Aimee Dannaoui, Alexandria Fatata-Haim, Jillian Fromkin, Christian Nelson, Vincent Laudone, Sigrid V Carlsson","doi":"10.1080/07347332.2024.2351038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the extensive literature supporting distress screening at relevant transitions of care, the implementation of distress screening remains limited in ambulatory surgery settings. Our multidisciplinary team completed a pilot study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of including a standardized psychosocial assessment, the Distress Thermometer (DT), with the collection of admission vital signs by Patient Care Technicians (PCTs) in patients undergoing oncology surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed feasibility by the response rate and acceptability through discussions with the PCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 189 men who underwent radical prostatectomy at our center, 71 were approached with the DT scale, and all patients who were approached completed the DT with no missing data. The staff reported no issues with data collection. A total of 21/71 (30%; 95% CI 19%, 42%) reported a clinically relevant distress DT ≥ 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrated that incorporating the DT into vital sign collection was feasible, acceptable, and provided a valuable assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"733-738"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2024.2351038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the extensive literature supporting distress screening at relevant transitions of care, the implementation of distress screening remains limited in ambulatory surgery settings. Our multidisciplinary team completed a pilot study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of including a standardized psychosocial assessment, the Distress Thermometer (DT), with the collection of admission vital signs by Patient Care Technicians (PCTs) in patients undergoing oncology surgery.

Methods: We assessed feasibility by the response rate and acceptability through discussions with the PCTs.

Results: Of the 189 men who underwent radical prostatectomy at our center, 71 were approached with the DT scale, and all patients who were approached completed the DT with no missing data. The staff reported no issues with data collection. A total of 21/71 (30%; 95% CI 19%, 42%) reported a clinically relevant distress DT ≥ 4.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that incorporating the DT into vital sign collection was feasible, acceptable, and provided a valuable assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将窘迫温度计纳入接受非住院肿瘤手术患者的术前生命体征:一项试点可行性研究。
背景:尽管有大量文献支持在相关护理过渡阶段进行窘迫筛查,但在门诊手术环境中,窘迫筛查的实施仍然有限。我们的多学科团队完成了一项试点研究,评估了在患者护理技师(PCT)收集肿瘤手术患者入院生命体征的同时纳入标准化心理社会评估--窘迫温度计(DT)的可行性和可接受性:方法:我们通过与患者护理技师讨论,根据回复率和可接受性评估了可行性:结果:在本中心接受根治性前列腺切除术的 189 名男性患者中,有 71 人接受了 DT 量表,所有接受量表的患者都完成了 DT,无数据缺失。据工作人员报告,在数据收集方面没有出现任何问题。共有 21/71 例患者(30%;95% CI 19%,42%)报告临床相关窘迫 DT ≥ 4.结论:我们的研究结果表明,将 DT 纳入生命体征采集是可行的、可接受的,并能提供有价值的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Here is your single source of integrated information on providing the best psychosocial care possible from the knowledge available from many disciplines.The Journal of Psychosocial Oncology is an essential source for up-to-date clinical and research material geared toward health professionals who provide psychosocial services to cancer patients, their families, and their caregivers. The journal—the first interdisciplinary resource of its kind—is in its third decade of examining exploratory and hypothesis testing and presenting program evaluation research on critical areas, including: the stigma of cancer; employment and personal problems facing cancer patients; patient education.
期刊最新文献
Interpersonal impacts of cancer diagnosis and treatment: A mixed methods study among young adult cancer survivors. Psychometric properties of The Self-Efficacy to Communicate about Sex and Intimacy (SECSI) Scale among patients in active treatment. Psychosocial support utilization among breast cancer patients experiencing reproductive concerns: A cross-sectional cohort study. Implications of neighborhood socioeconomic status on work ability among cancer survivors in the UNC cancer Survivorship Cohort. Distress Thermometer: proposal for cutoff points and evaluation of factors related to post-surgical distress in breast cancer patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1