Multimodal Quality Initiatives in Sepsis Care: Assessing Impact on Core Measures and Outcomes.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000440
Marcos Garcia, Mohammed Al-Jaghbeer, James Morrison, Antoine Boustany, Bindesh Ghimire, Neel Tapryal, Komal Mushtaq, Kelly Orlosky, Amy Flowers-Surovi, Christopher Murphy, Palak Rath, Muhaimen Rahman, Corrine Kickel, Yu-Che Lee, Ko-Yun Chang, Francois Abi Fadel
{"title":"Multimodal Quality Initiatives in Sepsis Care: Assessing Impact on Core Measures and Outcomes.","authors":"Marcos Garcia, Mohammed Al-Jaghbeer, James Morrison, Antoine Boustany, Bindesh Ghimire, Neel Tapryal, Komal Mushtaq, Kelly Orlosky, Amy Flowers-Surovi, Christopher Murphy, Palak Rath, Muhaimen Rahman, Corrine Kickel, Yu-Che Lee, Ko-Yun Chang, Francois Abi Fadel","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Providing timely and effective care for patients with sepsis is challenging due to delays in recognition and intervention. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has developed bundles that have been shown to reduce sepsis mortality. However, hospitals have not consistently adhered to these bundles, resulting in suboptimal outcomes. To address this, a multimodal quality improvement sepsis program was implemented from 2017 to 2022 in a large urban tertiary hospital. The aim of this program was to enhance the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle compliance and reduce sepsis mortality. At baseline, the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle compliance rates were low, at 25%, with a sepsis observed/expected mortality ratio of 1.14. Our interventions included the formation of a multidisciplinary committee, the appointment of sepsis champions, the implementation of sepsis alerts and order sets, the formation of a Code Sepsis team, real-time audits, and peer-to-peer education. By 2022, compliance rose to 62%, and the observed/expected mortality ratio decreased to 0.73. Our approach led to improved outcomes and hospital rankings. These findings underscore the efficacy of a comprehensive sepsis care initiative, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. A multimodal hospital-wide sepsis performance program is feasible and can contribute to improved outcomes. However, further research is necessary to determine the specific impact of individual strategies on sepsis outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":"245-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000440","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Providing timely and effective care for patients with sepsis is challenging due to delays in recognition and intervention. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has developed bundles that have been shown to reduce sepsis mortality. However, hospitals have not consistently adhered to these bundles, resulting in suboptimal outcomes. To address this, a multimodal quality improvement sepsis program was implemented from 2017 to 2022 in a large urban tertiary hospital. The aim of this program was to enhance the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle compliance and reduce sepsis mortality. At baseline, the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle compliance rates were low, at 25%, with a sepsis observed/expected mortality ratio of 1.14. Our interventions included the formation of a multidisciplinary committee, the appointment of sepsis champions, the implementation of sepsis alerts and order sets, the formation of a Code Sepsis team, real-time audits, and peer-to-peer education. By 2022, compliance rose to 62%, and the observed/expected mortality ratio decreased to 0.73. Our approach led to improved outcomes and hospital rankings. These findings underscore the efficacy of a comprehensive sepsis care initiative, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. A multimodal hospital-wide sepsis performance program is feasible and can contribute to improved outcomes. However, further research is necessary to determine the specific impact of individual strategies on sepsis outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
败血症护理中的多模式质量倡议:评估对核心指标和结果的影响。
摘要:由于识别和干预方面的延误,为败血症患者提供及时有效的护理具有挑战性。脓毒症生存运动已制定了捆绑措施,这些措施已被证明可降低脓毒症死亡率。然而,医院并没有始终如一地遵守这些捆绑措施,从而导致了不理想的结果。为解决这一问题,2017 年至 2022 年,一家大型城市三级医院实施了一项多模式脓毒症质量改进计划。该计划旨在提高严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理捆绑的依从性,降低脓毒症死亡率。基线时,严重败血症和脓毒性休克管理捆绑包的合规率较低,仅为 25%,脓毒症观察/预期死亡率比为 1.14。我们的干预措施包括成立多学科委员会、任命脓毒症倡导者、实施脓毒症警报和医嘱集、组建脓毒症代码团队、进行实时审核以及开展同行教育。到 2022 年,合规率上升到 62%,观察/预期死亡率下降到 0.73。我们的方法改善了治疗效果和医院排名。这些研究结果凸显了败血症综合护理措施的功效,强调了跨学科合作的重要性。全院范围内的多模式脓毒症绩效计划是可行的,并有助于改善预后。然而,要确定个别策略对败血症结果的具体影响,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
期刊最新文献
Implementation of an Evidence-Based Treatment Protocol and Order Set for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome. Improving Time to Antibiotics for Long-Bone Open Fractures: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Increasing Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Resident-Run Clinic Through Partnership With Ophthalmology Clinic: A Pilot Study. Collaboration to Remove Barriers to Pump Integration With the Electronic Health Record. The Use of a Single Risk Assessment Tool for Mortality and Numerous Hospital-Acquired Conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1