Development of a defined approach for eye hazard identification of solid chemicals according to the three UN GHS categories.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-17 DOI:10.14573/altex.2401191
Nathalie Alépée, Els Adriaens
{"title":"Development of a defined approach for eye hazard identification of solid chemicals according to the three UN GHS categories.","authors":"Nathalie Alépée, Els Adriaens","doi":"10.14573/altex.2401191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently there are two OECD-adopted defined approaches (DA) for eye hazard identification of non-surfactant liquids (OECD TG 467). The current study aimed to develop a DA for eye hazard identification of solid chemicals according to the three UN GHS categories (Cat.1, Cat. 2, No Cat.): the DAS. The DAS combines two test methods described in OECD TG 437 and TG 492. The DAS was developed based on in-depth statistical analysis of a database on solids containing in vitro and historically curated in vivo Draize eye test data. The performance of the DAS was assessed by comparing the predictions with the classification based on in vivo Draize eye test data, on the one hand, and with the performance criteria established by the OECD expert group, on the other hand. In a first tier of the DAS, the SkinEthic™ HCE EIT method (TG 492) is used to distinguish No Cat. from classified substances. For classified substances, the BCOP LLBO method (TG 437) is used to identify Cat. 1, and the remaining solids are predicted Cat. 2. In summary, 77.4% Cat. 1 (N=31), 52.3% Cat. 2 (N=18), and 70.0% of No Cat. (N=60) solids were correctly identified compared to the classification based on the Draize eye test. The percentage of correct predictions met the minimum OECD performance values of 75% Cat. 1, 50% Cat. 2, and 70% No Cat., and the percentage of mispredictions was below the established maximum values. Therefore, inclusion of the DAS in OECD TG 467 has been achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":" ","pages":"457-468"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2401191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently there are two OECD-adopted defined approaches (DA) for eye hazard identification of non-surfactant liquids (OECD TG 467). The current study aimed to develop a DA for eye hazard identification of solid chemicals according to the three UN GHS categories (Cat.1, Cat. 2, No Cat.): the DAS. The DAS combines two test methods described in OECD TG 437 and TG 492. The DAS was developed based on in-depth statistical analysis of a database on solids containing in vitro and historically curated in vivo Draize eye test data. The performance of the DAS was assessed by comparing the predictions with the classification based on in vivo Draize eye test data, on the one hand, and with the performance criteria established by the OECD expert group, on the other hand. In a first tier of the DAS, the SkinEthic™ HCE EIT method (TG 492) is used to distinguish No Cat. from classified substances. For classified substances, the BCOP LLBO method (TG 437) is used to identify Cat. 1, and the remaining solids are predicted Cat. 2. In summary, 77.4% Cat. 1 (N=31), 52.3% Cat. 2 (N=18), and 70.0% of No Cat. (N=60) solids were correctly identified compared to the classification based on the Draize eye test. The percentage of correct predictions met the minimum OECD performance values of 75% Cat. 1, 50% Cat. 2, and 70% No Cat., and the percentage of mispredictions was below the established maximum values. Therefore, inclusion of the DAS in OECD TG 467 has been achieved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据联合国全球统一制度的三个类别,为固体化学品的眼睛危害识别制定明确的方法。
目前有两种经合组织(OECD)采用的用于识别非表面活性剂液体对眼睛危害的定义方法(DA)(OECD TG467)。本研究的目的是根据联合国全球统一制度对固体化学品的三个类别(Cat.1、Cat.2、No Cat.),开发一种用于眼睛危害识别的指定方法:DAS。DAS 结合了 OECD TG437 和 TG492 中描述的两种测试方法。DAS 是在对固体数据库进行深入统计分析的基础上开发出来的,该数据库中有体外和历史上经过整理的体内 Draize 眼睛测试数据。对 DAS 性能的评估,一方面是将预测结果与基于体内 Draize 眼睛测试数据的分类进行比较,另一方面是与 OECD 专家组制定的性能标准进行比较。在 DAS 的第一级中,SkinEthic™ HCE EIT 方法(TG492)用于区分无类别物质和分类物质。对于分类物质,则采用 BCOP LLBO 方法 (TG437) 来识别 Cat.1,其余固体则预测为 Cat.2.总之,77.4%为类别 1(N = 31),52.4%为类别 2(N = 31)。1 (N = 31), 52.3% Cat.2 类 (N = 18) 和 70.0% 的无类别 (N = 60)。(N = 60),与根据德赖兹眼力测试进行的分类相比,正确率分别为 77.4%(N = 31)、52.3%(N = 18)和 70.0%(N = 60)。正确预测的百分比达到了经合组织规定的最低性能值,即 75% Cat.1、50% Cat.而错误预测的百分比则低于规定的最大值。因此,已将 DAS 纳入 OECD TG 467。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ALTEX publishes original articles, short communications, reviews, as well as news and comments and meeting reports. Manuscripts submitted to ALTEX are evaluated by two expert reviewers. The evaluation takes into account the scientific merit of a manuscript and its contribution to animal welfare and the 3R principle.
期刊最新文献
Systematic analysis of read-across adaptations in testing proposal evaluations by the European Chemicals Agency. Impact of gut permeability on estimation of oral bioavailability for chemicals in commerce and the environment. Software tools for systematic review literature screening and data extraction: Qualitative user experiences from succinct formal tests. The Virtual Human Platform for Safety Assessment (VHP4Safety) project: Next generation chemical safety assessment based on human data. Characterization of the C17.2 cell line as testing system for endocrine disruption-induced developmental neurotoxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1