Optimizing patient outcomes: the impact of multimodal preemptive analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivae096
Bing Li, Yu Chen, Rong Ma
{"title":"Optimizing patient outcomes: the impact of multimodal preemptive analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.","authors":"Bing Li, Yu Chen, Rong Ma","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal preemptive analgesia management approach, specifically incorporating ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (UG-TPVB) in conjunction with intravenous analgesia, after video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy under the guidance of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 690 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy between October 2021 and March 2022 were divided into the UG-TPVB group (group T, n = 345) and control group (group C, n = 345). Patients in group T received UG-TPVB prior to the induction of general anaesthesia, while group C did not undergo nerve block. A comparison was conducted between the two groups regarding various indicators, including postoperative sedation, static/dynamic numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, duration of mechanical ventilation/anaesthesia recovery/hospitalization, postoperative complications, and other relevant factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The static/dynamic NRS scores of group T were lower than those of group C after surgery. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption in group T (0.384 ± 0.095 mg) was lower than that in group C (0.465 ± 0.053 mg). The duration of mechanical ventilation, anaesthesia recovery, and hospitalization were significantly shorter in group T compared to group C. Patient satisfaction rate in group T (70.1%) was higher than that in group C (53.6%). All differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multimodal preemptive analgesia management strategy effectively reduces postoperative pain, decreases opioid consumption, and promotes faster recovery in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal preemptive analgesia management approach, specifically incorporating ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (UG-TPVB) in conjunction with intravenous analgesia, after video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy under the guidance of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS).

Methods: A total of 690 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy between October 2021 and March 2022 were divided into the UG-TPVB group (group T, n = 345) and control group (group C, n = 345). Patients in group T received UG-TPVB prior to the induction of general anaesthesia, while group C did not undergo nerve block. A comparison was conducted between the two groups regarding various indicators, including postoperative sedation, static/dynamic numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, duration of mechanical ventilation/anaesthesia recovery/hospitalization, postoperative complications, and other relevant factors.

Results: The static/dynamic NRS scores of group T were lower than those of group C after surgery. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption in group T (0.384 ± 0.095 mg) was lower than that in group C (0.465 ± 0.053 mg). The duration of mechanical ventilation, anaesthesia recovery, and hospitalization were significantly shorter in group T compared to group C. Patient satisfaction rate in group T (70.1%) was higher than that in group C (53.6%). All differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The multimodal preemptive analgesia management strategy effectively reduces postoperative pain, decreases opioid consumption, and promotes faster recovery in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化患者疗效:视频辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术中多模式预先镇痛的影响。
目的评估在 "术后增强恢复"(ERAS)指导下进行视频辅助胸腔镜(VATS)肺叶切除术后多模式预先镇痛管理方法的疗效,特别是结合超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞(UG-TPVB)和静脉镇痛:方法:将2021年10月至2022年3月期间接受VATS肺叶切除术的690名患者分为UG-TPVB组(T组,n = 345)和对照组(C组,n = 345)。T 组患者在全身麻醉诱导前接受 UG-TPVB 治疗,而 C 组患者不接受神经阻滞治疗。对两组患者的各项指标进行比较,包括术后镇静、静态/动态数字评分量表(NRS)评分、术中芬太尼用量、机械通气/麻醉恢复/住院时间、术后并发症及其他相关因素:结果:T组术后的静态/动态NRS评分均低于C组。T 组术中芬太尼用量(0.384 ± 0.095 毫克)低于 C 组(0.465 ± 0.053 毫克)。T 组患者的满意度(70.1%)高于 C 组(53.6%)。所有差异均有统计学意义(P 结论:T 组患者的满意度高于 C 组:多模式预先镇痛管理策略可有效减轻 VATS 肺叶切除术患者的术后疼痛,减少阿片类药物的用量,并促进患者更快康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of superior trunk brachial plexus injury after right mini-thoracotomy mitral valve repair. Association between preoperative D-dimer with morphologic features and surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection. Defining the causes for Fontan circulatory failure in total cavopulmonary connection patients. Risk of neurologic events after surgery for mitral valve insufficiency and concomitant cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation. A nationwide register-based study. Robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation for inappropriate sinus tachycardia: a world-first approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1