Method Validation Study of Dipstick Urinalysis as a Screening Tool for Sodium Nitrite Toxicity.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1097/PAF.0000000000000940
Jessicia S Schmitt, Laura D Knight
{"title":"Method Validation Study of Dipstick Urinalysis as a Screening Tool for Sodium Nitrite Toxicity.","authors":"Jessicia S Schmitt, Laura D Knight","doi":"10.1097/PAF.0000000000000940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The incidence of suicide by intentional nitrite ingestion has increased since 2017. Limited options exist for commercial laboratory analysis for nitrite/nitrate. This study investigates the use of urine dipsticks for screening at autopsy for potential toxicity with sodium nitrite and, less commonly, alkyl nitrite. Archived samples of blood, urine, vitreous fluid, and gastric contents from 4 sodium nitrite/nitrate cases, 3 alkyl nitrite cases, and 4 control cases were tested using dipsticks. A rapid, strong positive result for nitrite was in the vitreous fluid of all 4-sodium nitrite/nitrate cases, along with 2 positive urine and 1 positive gastric. The 2 alkyl nitrite inhalation toxicity cases had no positive results. One alkyl nitrite ingestion case had a positive urine. The 4 controls had negative urine: equivocal results in 2 vitreous, and 1 positive gastric. Urine dipsticks are a useful adjunct to laboratory testing for nitrite toxicity and provide a rapid, cost-effective tableside result that may guide the need for further testing. Vitreous fluid and urine appear to be the most reliable specimens, although testing of gastric liquid may be useful to corroborate oral ingestion. Dipsticks may not be a reliable adjunct for testing for alkyl nitrite toxicity via inhalation route, likely due to the much lower nitrite concentration compared to nitrite ingestion cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":55535,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The incidence of suicide by intentional nitrite ingestion has increased since 2017. Limited options exist for commercial laboratory analysis for nitrite/nitrate. This study investigates the use of urine dipsticks for screening at autopsy for potential toxicity with sodium nitrite and, less commonly, alkyl nitrite. Archived samples of blood, urine, vitreous fluid, and gastric contents from 4 sodium nitrite/nitrate cases, 3 alkyl nitrite cases, and 4 control cases were tested using dipsticks. A rapid, strong positive result for nitrite was in the vitreous fluid of all 4-sodium nitrite/nitrate cases, along with 2 positive urine and 1 positive gastric. The 2 alkyl nitrite inhalation toxicity cases had no positive results. One alkyl nitrite ingestion case had a positive urine. The 4 controls had negative urine: equivocal results in 2 vitreous, and 1 positive gastric. Urine dipsticks are a useful adjunct to laboratory testing for nitrite toxicity and provide a rapid, cost-effective tableside result that may guide the need for further testing. Vitreous fluid and urine appear to be the most reliable specimens, although testing of gastric liquid may be useful to corroborate oral ingestion. Dipsticks may not be a reliable adjunct for testing for alkyl nitrite toxicity via inhalation route, likely due to the much lower nitrite concentration compared to nitrite ingestion cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将浸量尺尿液分析法作为亚硝酸钠毒性筛查工具的方法验证研究
摘要:2017年以来,故意摄入亚硝酸盐自杀的发生率有所上升。亚硝酸盐/硝酸盐的商业实验室分析方案有限。本研究调查了在尸检时使用尿液浸渍棒筛查亚硝酸钠和亚硝酸烷基酯的潜在毒性(亚硝酸钠和亚硝酸烷基酯较少见)的情况。使用滴管检测了 4 个亚硝酸钠/硝酸盐病例、3 个亚硝酸烷基酯病例和 4 个对照病例的血液、尿液、玻璃体液和胃内容物的存档样本。在所有 4 个亚硝酸钠/硝酸盐病例的玻璃体液中,亚硝酸盐快速呈强阳性结果,尿液和胃内容物也分别有 2 个和 1 个阳性结果。2 个亚硝酸烷基吸入中毒病例没有阳性结果。一个亚硝酸烷基酯摄入病例的尿液呈阳性。4 例对照组尿液呈阴性:2 例玻璃体结果不明确,1 例胃液呈阳性。尿液滴定管是实验室检测亚硝酸盐中毒的有效辅助工具,可提供快速、经济的桌边检测结果,从而指导是否需要进一步检测。玻璃体液和尿液似乎是最可靠的标本,尽管胃液检测可能有助于证实口服。浸渍棒可能不是通过吸入途径检测亚硝酸烷基毒性的可靠辅助方法,这可能是由于亚硝酸盐浓度远低于亚硝酸盐摄入病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drawing on the expertise of leading forensic pathologists, lawyers, and criminologists, The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology presents up-to-date coverage of forensic medical practices worldwide. Each issue of the journal features original articles on new examination and documentation procedures. While most articles are available as web based articles, PDF and in ePub reader format, some earlier articles do not have PDFs available. If you would like to view an article in the ePub format, you will need to download an ePub reader to view this file, a number of which are available for free online.
期刊最新文献
Lethal Self-Administration of Atracurium: A Rarely Reported Case with Review of Literature. What Has the Sudden Unexpected Infant Death and Sudden Death in the Young Case Registry Learned About Consenting Families for DNA Banking and/or Genomic Research? Conduction System Hamartoma: Autopsy Case Series. TASER 7 and TASER 10 Probe Penetration Into Human Skull Simulants. Do Not Turn a Blind Eye on Forensic Biochemistry: Using Vitreous Electrolytes to Reveal Renal Insufficiency as Cause of Death.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1