Risk perception and use of personal care products by race and ethnicity among a diverse population.

UCL open environment Pub Date : 2024-05-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3038
Julia Mandeville, Zeina Alkhalaf, Charlotte Joannidis, Michelle Ryan, Devon Nelson, Lesliam Quiros-Alcala, Matthew O Gribble, Anna Z Pollack
{"title":"Risk perception and use of personal care products by race and ethnicity among a diverse population.","authors":"Julia Mandeville, Zeina Alkhalaf, Charlotte Joannidis, Michelle Ryan, Devon Nelson, Lesliam Quiros-Alcala, Matthew O Gribble, Anna Z Pollack","doi":"10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personal care products can contain phthalates, parabens and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals. However, information on perception of risks from personal care product use and how use varies by race and ethnicity is limited. We evaluated differences in personal care product use and risk perception in a diverse sample of participants recruited from a US college campus and online. A self-administered questionnaire captured information on sociodemographic factors, personal care product use trends and perception of risk associated with them. Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine differences in personal care product use and risk perception by race and ethnicity. Ordered logistic regressions were performed to measure associations between personal care product use frequency across racial/ethnic categories. Participant (n = 770) mean age was 22.8 years [standard deviation ± 6.0]. Daily use of make-up (eye = 29.3%; other = 38.0%; all = 33.7%) and skincare products (55%) was most frequently reported among Middle Eastern and North African participants. Non-Hispanic Black participants reported the highest daily use of hairstyling products (52%) and lotion (78%). Daily make-up use was more frequently reported among females (41%) than males (24.6%). Levels of agreement were similar across racial and ethnic groups, that personal care product manufacturers should be required to list all ingredients (≥87%). There were significant associations between the frequency of use of some personal care products and racial/ethnic categories when the use frequencies of participants from other racial/ethnic categories were compared to the use frequency of non-Hispanic White participants. There were significant differences in daily use frequency, levels of trust, perception of safety and health risks associated with personal care products by race and ethnicity, underscoring that there may be different sources of exposure to chemicals in personal care products by race and ethnicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":75271,"journal":{"name":"UCL open environment","volume":"6 ","pages":"e3038"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCL open environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personal care products can contain phthalates, parabens and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals. However, information on perception of risks from personal care product use and how use varies by race and ethnicity is limited. We evaluated differences in personal care product use and risk perception in a diverse sample of participants recruited from a US college campus and online. A self-administered questionnaire captured information on sociodemographic factors, personal care product use trends and perception of risk associated with them. Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine differences in personal care product use and risk perception by race and ethnicity. Ordered logistic regressions were performed to measure associations between personal care product use frequency across racial/ethnic categories. Participant (n = 770) mean age was 22.8 years [standard deviation ± 6.0]. Daily use of make-up (eye = 29.3%; other = 38.0%; all = 33.7%) and skincare products (55%) was most frequently reported among Middle Eastern and North African participants. Non-Hispanic Black participants reported the highest daily use of hairstyling products (52%) and lotion (78%). Daily make-up use was more frequently reported among females (41%) than males (24.6%). Levels of agreement were similar across racial and ethnic groups, that personal care product manufacturers should be required to list all ingredients (≥87%). There were significant associations between the frequency of use of some personal care products and racial/ethnic categories when the use frequencies of participants from other racial/ethnic categories were compared to the use frequency of non-Hispanic White participants. There were significant differences in daily use frequency, levels of trust, perception of safety and health risks associated with personal care products by race and ethnicity, underscoring that there may be different sources of exposure to chemicals in personal care products by race and ethnicity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按种族和民族划分的不同人群对个人护理产品的风险认知和使用情况。
个人护理产品可能含有邻苯二甲酸盐、苯甲酸酯和其他干扰内分泌的化学物质。然而,有关个人护理产品使用风险的认知以及不同种族和民族在使用上的差异的信息却很有限。我们评估了从美国大学校园和网上招募的不同样本参与者在个人护理产品使用和风险认知方面的差异。我们通过自填问卷的方式获取了有关社会人口学因素、个人护理产品使用趋势和相关风险认知的信息。采用皮尔逊卡方检验和费雪精确检验来确定不同种族和族裔在个人护理产品使用和风险认知方面的差异。我们还进行了有序逻辑回归,以衡量不同种族/族裔使用个人护理产品频率之间的关联。参与者(n = 770)的平均年龄为 22.8 岁[标准差 ± 6.0]。中东和北非参与者中,每天使用化妆品(眼部 = 29.3%;其他 = 38.0%;所有 = 33.7%)和护肤品(55%)的比例最高。非西班牙裔黑人参加者中,每天使用美发产品(52%)和乳液(78%)的人数最多。每天使用化妆品的女性(41%)多于男性(24.6%)。不同种族和族裔群体对要求个人护理产品生产商列出所有成分的认同度相似(≥87%)。如果将其他种族/族裔参与者的使用频率与非西班牙裔白人参与者的使用频率进行比较,则某些个人护理产品的使用频率与种族/族裔类别之间存在明显关联。不同种族和族裔在个人护理产品的日常使用频率、信任程度、安全感和健康风险方面存在明显差异,这表明不同种族和族裔接触个人护理产品中化学物质的来源可能不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Procedural justice and (in)equitable participation in climate negotiations. Miniaturisation of the Daphnia magna immobilisation assay for the reliable testing of low volume samples. A virtual global carbon price is essential to drive rapid decarbonisation. Urinary arsenic species and birth outcomes in Tacna, Peru, 2019: a prospective cohort study. Hydrophobic treatments and their application with internal wall insulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1