Teresa Gomes, Andrea Benedetti, Ron Postuma, Dorrie Rizzo, Marc Baltzan, Richard John Kimoff, Marta Kaminska
{"title":"Comparison of Sleep Apnea Questionnaires and Reported Diagnosis in Neurological Disorders of Aging.","authors":"Teresa Gomes, Andrea Benedetti, Ron Postuma, Dorrie Rizzo, Marc Baltzan, Richard John Kimoff, Marta Kaminska","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with worse outcomes in stroke, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), but diagnosis is challenging in these groups. We aimed to compare the prevalence of high risk of OSA based on commonly used questionnaires and self-reported OSA diagnosis: 1. within groups with stroke, AD, PD and the general population (GP); 2. Between neurological groups and GP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with stroke, PD and AD were identified in the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA) by survey. STOP, STOP-BAG, STOP-B28 and GOAL screening tools and OSA self-report were compared by the Chi-squared test. Logistic regression was used to compare high risk/self-report of OSA, in neurological conditions vs. GP, adjusted for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 30,097 participants with mean age of 62.3 years (SD 10.3) (stroke <i>n</i> = 1791; PD <i>n</i> = 175; AD <i>n</i> = 125). In all groups, a positive GOAL was the most prevalent, while positive STOP was least prevalent among questionnaires. Significant variations in high-risk OSA were observed between different questionnaires across all groups. Under 1.5% of individuals self-reported OSA. While all questionnaires suggested a higher prevalence of OSA in stroke than the GP, for PD and AD, there was heterogeneity depending on questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The wide range of prevalences of high risk of OSA resulting from commonly used screening tools underscores the importance of validating them in older adults with neurological disorders. OSA was self-reported in disproportionately small numbers across groups, suggesting that OSA is underdiagnosed in older adults or underreported by patients, which is concerning given its increasingly recognized impact on brain health.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with worse outcomes in stroke, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), but diagnosis is challenging in these groups. We aimed to compare the prevalence of high risk of OSA based on commonly used questionnaires and self-reported OSA diagnosis: 1. within groups with stroke, AD, PD and the general population (GP); 2. Between neurological groups and GP.
Methods: Individuals with stroke, PD and AD were identified in the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA) by survey. STOP, STOP-BAG, STOP-B28 and GOAL screening tools and OSA self-report were compared by the Chi-squared test. Logistic regression was used to compare high risk/self-report of OSA, in neurological conditions vs. GP, adjusted for confounders.
Results: We studied 30,097 participants with mean age of 62.3 years (SD 10.3) (stroke n = 1791; PD n = 175; AD n = 125). In all groups, a positive GOAL was the most prevalent, while positive STOP was least prevalent among questionnaires. Significant variations in high-risk OSA were observed between different questionnaires across all groups. Under 1.5% of individuals self-reported OSA. While all questionnaires suggested a higher prevalence of OSA in stroke than the GP, for PD and AD, there was heterogeneity depending on questionnaire.
Conclusions: The wide range of prevalences of high risk of OSA resulting from commonly used screening tools underscores the importance of validating them in older adults with neurological disorders. OSA was self-reported in disproportionately small numbers across groups, suggesting that OSA is underdiagnosed in older adults or underreported by patients, which is concerning given its increasingly recognized impact on brain health.
背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与中风、阿尔茨海默病(AD)和帕金森病(PD)的不良预后有关,但在这些群体中诊断具有挑战性。我们的目的是根据常用的调查问卷和自我报告的 OSA 诊断结果,比较:1.中风、阿尔兹海默病、帕金森病和普通人群(GP)中高风险 OSA 的患病率;2.神经病学组和普通人群之间的患病率:方法:在加拿大老龄化纵向研究(CLSA)中,通过调查确定中风、老年痴呆症和注意力缺失症患者。通过卡方检验比较了 STOP、STOP-BAG、STOP-B28 和 GOAL 筛查工具和 OSA 自我报告。在对混杂因素进行调整后,使用 Logistic 回归对神经系统疾病与全科医生的高风险/自我报告 OSA 进行比较:我们研究了 30097 名参与者,他们的平均年龄为 62.3 岁(SD 10.3)(中风 n = 1791;帕金森病 n = 175;注意力缺失症 n = 125)。在所有组别中,"目标 "呈阳性的比例最高,而 "停止 "呈阳性的比例最低。在所有组别中,不同问卷之间的高危 OSA 存在显著差异。自我报告 OSA 的人数不足 1.5%。虽然所有问卷均显示中风患者的 OSA 患病率高于全科医生,但对于帕金森病和注意力缺失症患者来说,不同问卷之间存在差异:结论:常用筛查工具导致的OSA高风险患病率范围很广,这强调了在患有神经系统疾病的老年人中验证这些工具的重要性。各组中自我报告 OSA 的人数不成比例地少,这表明 OSA 在老年人中诊断不足或患者报告不足,鉴于其对大脑健康的影响日益得到认可,这一点令人担忧。
期刊介绍:
Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.