Comparison of Sleep Apnea Questionnaires and Reported Diagnosis in Neurological Disorders of Aging.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1017/cjn.2024.266
Teresa Gomes, Andrea Benedetti, Ron Postuma, Dorrie Rizzo, Marc Baltzan, Richard John Kimoff, Marta Kaminska
{"title":"Comparison of Sleep Apnea Questionnaires and Reported Diagnosis in Neurological Disorders of Aging.","authors":"Teresa Gomes, Andrea Benedetti, Ron Postuma, Dorrie Rizzo, Marc Baltzan, Richard John Kimoff, Marta Kaminska","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with worse outcomes in stroke, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), but diagnosis is challenging in these groups. We aimed to compare the prevalence of high risk of OSA based on commonly used questionnaires and self-reported OSA diagnosis: 1. within groups with stroke, AD, PD and the general population (GP); 2. Between neurological groups and GP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with stroke, PD and AD were identified in the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA) by survey. STOP, STOP-BAG, STOP-B28 and GOAL screening tools and OSA self-report were compared by the Chi-squared test. Logistic regression was used to compare high risk/self-report of OSA, in neurological conditions vs. GP, adjusted for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 30,097 participants with mean age of 62.3 years (SD 10.3) (stroke <i>n</i> = 1791; PD <i>n</i> = 175; AD <i>n</i> = 125). In all groups, a positive GOAL was the most prevalent, while positive STOP was least prevalent among questionnaires. Significant variations in high-risk OSA were observed between different questionnaires across all groups. Under 1.5% of individuals self-reported OSA. While all questionnaires suggested a higher prevalence of OSA in stroke than the GP, for PD and AD, there was heterogeneity depending on questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The wide range of prevalences of high risk of OSA resulting from commonly used screening tools underscores the importance of validating them in older adults with neurological disorders. OSA was self-reported in disproportionately small numbers across groups, suggesting that OSA is underdiagnosed in older adults or underreported by patients, which is concerning given its increasingly recognized impact on brain health.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with worse outcomes in stroke, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), but diagnosis is challenging in these groups. We aimed to compare the prevalence of high risk of OSA based on commonly used questionnaires and self-reported OSA diagnosis: 1. within groups with stroke, AD, PD and the general population (GP); 2. Between neurological groups and GP.

Methods: Individuals with stroke, PD and AD were identified in the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA) by survey. STOP, STOP-BAG, STOP-B28 and GOAL screening tools and OSA self-report were compared by the Chi-squared test. Logistic regression was used to compare high risk/self-report of OSA, in neurological conditions vs. GP, adjusted for confounders.

Results: We studied 30,097 participants with mean age of 62.3 years (SD 10.3) (stroke n = 1791; PD n = 175; AD n = 125). In all groups, a positive GOAL was the most prevalent, while positive STOP was least prevalent among questionnaires. Significant variations in high-risk OSA were observed between different questionnaires across all groups. Under 1.5% of individuals self-reported OSA. While all questionnaires suggested a higher prevalence of OSA in stroke than the GP, for PD and AD, there was heterogeneity depending on questionnaire.

Conclusions: The wide range of prevalences of high risk of OSA resulting from commonly used screening tools underscores the importance of validating them in older adults with neurological disorders. OSA was self-reported in disproportionately small numbers across groups, suggesting that OSA is underdiagnosed in older adults or underreported by patients, which is concerning given its increasingly recognized impact on brain health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
睡眠呼吸暂停问卷调查与老龄化神经系统疾病诊断报告的比较。
背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与中风、阿尔茨海默病(AD)和帕金森病(PD)的不良预后有关,但在这些群体中诊断具有挑战性。我们的目的是根据常用的调查问卷和自我报告的 OSA 诊断结果,比较:1.中风、阿尔兹海默病、帕金森病和普通人群(GP)中高风险 OSA 的患病率;2.神经病学组和普通人群之间的患病率:方法:在加拿大老龄化纵向研究(CLSA)中,通过调查确定中风、老年痴呆症和注意力缺失症患者。通过卡方检验比较了 STOP、STOP-BAG、STOP-B28 和 GOAL 筛查工具和 OSA 自我报告。在对混杂因素进行调整后,使用 Logistic 回归对神经系统疾病与全科医生的高风险/自我报告 OSA 进行比较:我们研究了 30097 名参与者,他们的平均年龄为 62.3 岁(SD 10.3)(中风 n = 1791;帕金森病 n = 175;注意力缺失症 n = 125)。在所有组别中,"目标 "呈阳性的比例最高,而 "停止 "呈阳性的比例最低。在所有组别中,不同问卷之间的高危 OSA 存在显著差异。自我报告 OSA 的人数不足 1.5%。虽然所有问卷均显示中风患者的 OSA 患病率高于全科医生,但对于帕金森病和注意力缺失症患者来说,不同问卷之间存在差异:结论:常用筛查工具导致的OSA高风险患病率范围很广,这强调了在患有神经系统疾病的老年人中验证这些工具的重要性。各组中自我报告 OSA 的人数不成比例地少,这表明 OSA 在老年人中诊断不足或患者报告不足,鉴于其对大脑健康的影响日益得到认可,这一点令人担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.
期刊最新文献
Sex Differences in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Randomized Controlled Trials. Updated Canadian Headache Society Migraine Prevention Guideline with Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. A Look Back on the History of Cerebral Revascularization for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Neurosurgeon's Perspective. Analysis of Clinical Utility of Functional MRI in Neurosurgical Decision-Making in Focal Epilepsy. The Effect of After-Hours Resection on the Outcomes in Patients with High-Grade Gliomas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1