Decomposition of medical imaging spending growth between 2010 and 2021 in the US employer-insured population.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-03-27 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae030
Michal Horný, Daniel Chang, Eric W Christensen, Elizabeth Y Rula, Richard Duszak
{"title":"Decomposition of medical imaging spending growth between 2010 and 2021 in the US employer-insured population.","authors":"Michal Horný, Daniel Chang, Eric W Christensen, Elizabeth Y Rula, Richard Duszak","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical imaging, identified as a potential driver of unsustainable US health care spending growth, was subject to policies to reduce prices and use in low-value settings. Meanwhile, the Affordable Care Act increased access to preventive services-many involving imaging-for employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) beneficiaries. We used a large insurance claims database to examine imaging spending trends in the ESI population between 2010 and 2021-a period of considerable policy and benefits changes. Nominal spending on imaging increased 35.9% between 2010 and 2021, but as a share of total health care spending fell from 10.5% to 8.9%. The 22.5% growth of nominal imaging prices was below inflation, 24.3%, as measured by the Consumer Price Index. Other key contributors to imaging spending growth were increased use (7.4 percentage points [pp]), shifts toward advanced modalities (4.0 pp), and demographic changes (3.5 pp). Shifts in care settings and provider network participation resulted in 2.5-pp and 0.3-pp imaging spending decreases, respectively. In sum, imaging spending decreased as a share of all health care spending and relative to inflation, as intended by concurrent cost-containment policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 3","pages":"qxae030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical imaging, identified as a potential driver of unsustainable US health care spending growth, was subject to policies to reduce prices and use in low-value settings. Meanwhile, the Affordable Care Act increased access to preventive services-many involving imaging-for employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) beneficiaries. We used a large insurance claims database to examine imaging spending trends in the ESI population between 2010 and 2021-a period of considerable policy and benefits changes. Nominal spending on imaging increased 35.9% between 2010 and 2021, but as a share of total health care spending fell from 10.5% to 8.9%. The 22.5% growth of nominal imaging prices was below inflation, 24.3%, as measured by the Consumer Price Index. Other key contributors to imaging spending growth were increased use (7.4 percentage points [pp]), shifts toward advanced modalities (4.0 pp), and demographic changes (3.5 pp). Shifts in care settings and provider network participation resulted in 2.5-pp and 0.3-pp imaging spending decreases, respectively. In sum, imaging spending decreased as a share of all health care spending and relative to inflation, as intended by concurrent cost-containment policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2010 年至 2021 年美国雇主参保人群医疗成像支出增长分解图。
医学影像被认为是美国医疗支出不可持续增长的潜在驱动力,因此受到了降低价格和在低价值环境中使用的政策的影响。与此同时,《平价医疗法案》增加了雇主赞助保险(ESI)受益人获得预防性服务的机会,其中许多服务涉及影像检查。我们利用大型保险理赔数据库,研究了 2010 年至 2021 年期间 ESI 群体的影像学支出趋势--在此期间,政策和福利发生了巨大变化。2010 年至 2021 年期间,影像学的名义支出增长了 35.9%,但在医疗保健总支出中所占的比例却从 10.5% 降至 8.9%。成像名义价格增长 22.5%,低于消费价格指数衡量的通胀率 24.3%。造成成像支出增长的其他主要因素包括:使用量的增加(7.4 个百分点)、向先进模式的转变(4.0 个百分点)以及人口结构的变化(3.5 个百分点)。医疗机构和医疗服务提供者网络参与度的变化分别导致成像支出下降 2.5 个百分点和 0.3 个百分点。总之,影像学支出在所有医疗支出中所占的比例以及相对于通货膨胀率都有所下降,这也是同时实施的成本控制政策的初衷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: No Surprises Act independent dispute resolution outcomes for emergency services. All-cause nursing home mortality rates have remained above pre-pandemic levels after accounting for decline in occupancy. Charting new territory: the early lessons in integrating social determinant of health (SDOH) measures into practice. Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States. Examining the use of telehealth to initiate buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1