Electronic-Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (e-SBIRT) for Addictive Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1177/29767342241248926
Matthew Jones, Christopher J Seel, Simon Dymond
{"title":"Electronic-Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (e-SBIRT) for Addictive Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Matthew Jones, Christopher J Seel, Simon Dymond","doi":"10.1177/29767342241248926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addictive disorders are significant global public health burdens. Treatment uptake with these disorders is low and outcomes can be mixed. Electronic screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (e-SBIRT) programs have potential to improve uptake and treatment outcomes. To date, however, no prior review of the literature has been conducted to gauge the effectiveness of e-SBIRT for addictive disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature concerning e-SBIRT for addictive disorders by surveying the MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and PsycInfo databases on January 17, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten articles were included at analysis reporting evaluation of e-SBIRT interventions for substance use disorders including alcohol use in a variety of settings. No articles were identified regarding treatment for behavioral addictions such as disordered/harmful gambling. Meta-analysis found e-SBIRT to be effective at reducing drinking frequency in the short term only. e-SBIRT was not found to be advantageous over control conditions for abstinence or other treatment outcomes. We identified and described common components of e-SBIRT programs and assessed the quality of available evidence, which was generally poor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present findings suggest that research regarding e-SBIRT is concentrated exclusively on higher-risk substance use. There is a lack of consensus regarding the effectiveness of e-SBIRT for addictive disorders. Although common features exist, e-SBIRT designs are variable, which complicates identification of the most effective components. Overall, the quality of outcome evidence is low, and furthermore, high-quality experimental treatment evaluation research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"736-752"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241248926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Addictive disorders are significant global public health burdens. Treatment uptake with these disorders is low and outcomes can be mixed. Electronic screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (e-SBIRT) programs have potential to improve uptake and treatment outcomes. To date, however, no prior review of the literature has been conducted to gauge the effectiveness of e-SBIRT for addictive disorders.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature concerning e-SBIRT for addictive disorders by surveying the MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and PsycInfo databases on January 17, 2023.

Results: Ten articles were included at analysis reporting evaluation of e-SBIRT interventions for substance use disorders including alcohol use in a variety of settings. No articles were identified regarding treatment for behavioral addictions such as disordered/harmful gambling. Meta-analysis found e-SBIRT to be effective at reducing drinking frequency in the short term only. e-SBIRT was not found to be advantageous over control conditions for abstinence or other treatment outcomes. We identified and described common components of e-SBIRT programs and assessed the quality of available evidence, which was generally poor.

Conclusion: The present findings suggest that research regarding e-SBIRT is concentrated exclusively on higher-risk substance use. There is a lack of consensus regarding the effectiveness of e-SBIRT for addictive disorders. Although common features exist, e-SBIRT designs are variable, which complicates identification of the most effective components. Overall, the quality of outcome evidence is low, and furthermore, high-quality experimental treatment evaluation research is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成瘾性疾病的电子筛查、简单干预和转介治疗(e-SBIRT):系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:成瘾性疾病是全球公共卫生的重大负担。这些疾病的治疗率很低,治疗效果也参差不齐。电子筛查、简短干预和转介治疗(e-SBIRT)计划有可能提高接受率和治疗效果。然而,迄今为止,尚未有文献对电子筛查、简单干预和转介治疗(e-SBIRT)对成瘾性疾病的有效性进行评估:我们于 2023 年 1 月 17 日调查了 MEDLINE、PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase 和 PsycInfo 数据库,对有关 e-SBIRT 治疗成瘾性疾病的文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析:结果:在分析过程中,共收录了 10 篇文章,这些文章报告了在各种环境下对药物使用障碍(包括酒精使用)的 e-SBIRT 干预措施进行的评估。未发现有关治疗行为成瘾(如无序/有害赌博)的文章。Meta 分析发现,e-SBIRT 仅能在短期内有效降低饮酒频率,在戒酒或其他治疗结果方面,e-SBIRT 与对照条件相比并无优势。我们确定并描述了e-SBIRT项目的常见组成部分,并对现有证据的质量进行了评估,结果普遍较差:本研究结果表明,有关 e-SBIRT 的研究主要集中在高风险药物使用方面。关于 e-SBIRT 对成瘾性疾病的有效性,目前还缺乏共识。虽然 e-SBIRT 有一些共同的特点,但其设计却各不相同,这使得确定最有效的组成部分变得更加复杂。总体而言,结果证据的质量较低,此外,还需要进行高质量的实验性治疗评估研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultivating Leaders in the Addiction Behavioral Health Workforce: New England Addiction Technology Transfer Center's Leadership Development Program. Building Stronger Communities Through Addiction Care Innovation, Research, Education, and Advocacy-Overview and Proceedings of the AMERSA 2025 Conference. Associations between Training Experiences, Job Stress, Personal Achievement, and Emotional Exhaustion among Peer Support Workers in the Substance Use Disorder Recovery Field. Evaluation of an Emergency Department-Based Peer Recovery Support Intervention for People Who Use Substances in Nevada. Telehealth and Intervention Stigma: Patient Perspectives About Flexible Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1