Efficacy of stromal vascular fraction for knee osteoarthritis: A prospective, single-centre, non-randomized study with 2 years follow-up

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS World Journal of Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.5312/wjo.v15.i5.457
Madhan Jeyaraman, Naveen Jeyaraman, Tarun Jayakumar, Swaminathan Ramasubramanian, Rajni Ranjan, S. Jha, Ashim Gupta
{"title":"Efficacy of stromal vascular fraction for knee osteoarthritis: A prospective, single-centre, non-randomized study with 2 years follow-up","authors":"Madhan Jeyaraman, Naveen Jeyaraman, Tarun Jayakumar, Swaminathan Ramasubramanian, Rajni Ranjan, S. Jha, Ashim Gupta","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v15.i5.457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Current osteoarthritis (OA) treatments focus on symptom relief without addressing the underlying disease process. In regenerative medicine, current treatments have limitations. In regenerative medicine, more research is needed for intra-articular stromal vascular fraction (SVF) injections in OA, including dosage optimization, long-term efficacy, safety, comparisons with other treatments, and mechanism exploration.\n AIM\n To compare the efficacy of intra-articular SVF with corticosteroid (ICS) injections in patients with primary knee OA.\n METHODS\n The study included 50 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grades II and III OA. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either a single intra-articular SVF injection (group A) or a single intra-articular ICS (triamcinolone) (group B) injection. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Visual analog score (VAS) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were administered before the procedure and at all follow-ups. The safety of SVF in terms of adverse and severe adverse events was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Version 26.0, IBM Corp, Chicago, IL, United States.\n RESULTS\n Both groups had similar demographics and baseline clinical characteristics. Follow-up showed minor patient loss, resulting in 23 and 24 in groups A and B respectively. Group A experienced a notable reduction in pain, with VAS scores decreasing from 7.7 to 2.4 over 24 months, compared to a minor reduction from 7.8 to 6.2 in Group B. This difference in pain reduction in group A was statistically significant from the third month onwards. Additionally, Group A showed significant improvements in knee functionality, with IKDC scores rising from 33.4 to 83.10, whereas Group B saw a modest increase from 36.7 to 45.16. The improvement in Group A was statistically significant from 6 months and maintained through 24 months.\n CONCLUSION\n Our study demonstrated that intra-articular administration of SVF can lead to reduced pain and improved knee function in patients with primary knee OA. More adequately powered, multi-center, double-blinded, randomised clinical trials with longer follow-ups are needed to further establish safety and justify its clinical use.","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i5.457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Current osteoarthritis (OA) treatments focus on symptom relief without addressing the underlying disease process. In regenerative medicine, current treatments have limitations. In regenerative medicine, more research is needed for intra-articular stromal vascular fraction (SVF) injections in OA, including dosage optimization, long-term efficacy, safety, comparisons with other treatments, and mechanism exploration. AIM To compare the efficacy of intra-articular SVF with corticosteroid (ICS) injections in patients with primary knee OA. METHODS The study included 50 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grades II and III OA. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either a single intra-articular SVF injection (group A) or a single intra-articular ICS (triamcinolone) (group B) injection. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Visual analog score (VAS) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were administered before the procedure and at all follow-ups. The safety of SVF in terms of adverse and severe adverse events was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Version 26.0, IBM Corp, Chicago, IL, United States. RESULTS Both groups had similar demographics and baseline clinical characteristics. Follow-up showed minor patient loss, resulting in 23 and 24 in groups A and B respectively. Group A experienced a notable reduction in pain, with VAS scores decreasing from 7.7 to 2.4 over 24 months, compared to a minor reduction from 7.8 to 6.2 in Group B. This difference in pain reduction in group A was statistically significant from the third month onwards. Additionally, Group A showed significant improvements in knee functionality, with IKDC scores rising from 33.4 to 83.10, whereas Group B saw a modest increase from 36.7 to 45.16. The improvement in Group A was statistically significant from 6 months and maintained through 24 months. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that intra-articular administration of SVF can lead to reduced pain and improved knee function in patients with primary knee OA. More adequately powered, multi-center, double-blinded, randomised clinical trials with longer follow-ups are needed to further establish safety and justify its clinical use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基质血管成分对膝关节骨性关节炎的疗效:一项为期两年的前瞻性单中心非随机研究
背景 目前的骨关节炎(OA)治疗主要集中在缓解症状上,而没有从根本上解决疾病过程。在再生医学方面,目前的治疗方法存在局限性。在再生医学领域,需要对关节内基质血管成分(SVF)注射治疗 OA 进行更多研究,包括剂量优化、长期疗效、安全性、与其他治疗方法的比较以及机制探索。目的 比较原发性膝关节 OA 患者关节内 SVF 与皮质类固醇(ICS)注射的疗效。方法 该研究包括 50 名凯尔格伦-劳伦斯 II 级和 III 级 OA 患者。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受单次关节内 SVF 注射(A 组)或单次关节内 ICS(曲安奈德)注射(B 组)。患者分别在 1、3、6、12 和 24 个月时接受随访。术前和所有随访期间均进行了视觉模拟评分(VAS)和国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分。记录了 SVF 在不良和严重不良事件方面的安全性。统计分析采用美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥市 IBM 公司的 SPSS 26.0 版本进行。结果 两组的人口统计学和基线临床特征相似。随访结果显示,A 组和 B 组分别有 23 名和 24 名病人流失。A 组疼痛明显减轻,24 个月内 VAS 评分从 7.7 分降至 2.4 分,而 B 组仅从 7.8 分降至 6.2 分。此外,A 组的膝关节功能也有明显改善,IKDC 评分从 33.4 分上升到 83.10 分,而 B 组则从 36.7 分略微上升到 45.16 分。A 组的改善从 6 个月起就具有统计学意义,并持续了 24 个月。结论 我们的研究表明,关节内注射 SVF 可以减轻原发性膝关节 OA 患者的疼痛并改善膝关节功能。要进一步确定 SVF 的安全性并证明其临床应用的合理性,还需要进行更多充分有效的多中心、双盲、随机临床试验和更长时间的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
期刊最新文献
Application prospects of urine-derived stem cells in neurological and musculoskeletal diseases. Atypical cervical spondylotic radiculopathy resulting in a hypertensive emergency during cervical extension: A case report and review of literature. Clinical implications of reconsideration of enthesitis/enthesopathy/enthesial erosion, as tendon attachment-localized avulsions and stress fracture equivalents. Conversion hip arthroplasty for failed nailing of intertrochanteric fracture: Reflections on some important aspects. Evidence-based orthobiologic practice: Current evidence review and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1