Autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics: Different types and their effectiveness in managing knee osteoarthritis

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS World Journal of Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.5312/wjo.v15.i5.400
Ashim Gupta, V. Jain
{"title":"Autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics: Different types and their effectiveness in managing knee osteoarthritis","authors":"Ashim Gupta, V. Jain","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v15.i5.400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knees are the most commonly impacted weight-bearing joints in osteoarthritis (OA), affecting millions of people worldwide. With increasing life spans and obesity rates, the incidence of knee OA will further increase, leading to a significant increase in the economic burden. Conventional treatment modalities utilized to manage knee OA have limitations. Over the last decade, the role of various autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics (APBOs) for the treatment of knee OA has been extensively investigated. This editorial provided an overview and focused on defining and shedding light on the current state of evidence based on the most recent published clinical studies concerning the use of APBO for the management of knee OA. While numerous studies have demonstrated promising results for these preparations, a notable gap exists in the comparative analysis of these diverse formulations. This absence of head-to-head studies poses a considerable challenge for physicians/surgeons in determining the optimal preparation for managing knee OA and achieving sustained long-term results. Thus, more adequately powered, multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trials with longer follow-ups are needed to establish the long-term efficacy and to aid physicians/surgeons in determining the optimal APBO for the management of knee OA.","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i5.400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knees are the most commonly impacted weight-bearing joints in osteoarthritis (OA), affecting millions of people worldwide. With increasing life spans and obesity rates, the incidence of knee OA will further increase, leading to a significant increase in the economic burden. Conventional treatment modalities utilized to manage knee OA have limitations. Over the last decade, the role of various autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics (APBOs) for the treatment of knee OA has been extensively investigated. This editorial provided an overview and focused on defining and shedding light on the current state of evidence based on the most recent published clinical studies concerning the use of APBO for the management of knee OA. While numerous studies have demonstrated promising results for these preparations, a notable gap exists in the comparative analysis of these diverse formulations. This absence of head-to-head studies poses a considerable challenge for physicians/surgeons in determining the optimal preparation for managing knee OA and achieving sustained long-term results. Thus, more adequately powered, multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trials with longer follow-ups are needed to establish the long-term efficacy and to aid physicians/surgeons in determining the optimal APBO for the management of knee OA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
源自外周血的自体生物制剂:不同类型及其在治疗膝关节骨关节炎方面的功效
膝关节是骨关节炎(OA)中最常受影响的负重关节,影响着全球数百万人。随着寿命的延长和肥胖率的增加,膝关节 OA 的发病率将进一步上升,从而导致经济负担大幅增加。用于治疗膝关节 OA 的传统治疗方法存在局限性。在过去十年中,各种自体外周血衍生骨生物制品(APBOs)在治疗膝关节 OA 方面的作用已得到广泛研究。这篇社论提供了一个概览,重点是根据最新发表的有关使用 APBO 治疗膝关节 OA 的临床研究来定义和阐明目前的证据状况。虽然许多研究都证明了这些制剂具有良好的疗效,但在对这些不同制剂进行比较分析方面还存在明显的差距。缺乏头对头的研究给内科医生/外科医生确定治疗膝关节 OA 的最佳制剂并获得长期持续的疗效带来了巨大挑战。因此,需要更多有充分支持的多中心、前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验和更长时间的随访,以确定长期疗效,并帮助内科医生/外科医生确定治疗膝关节 OA 的最佳 APBO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
期刊最新文献
Application prospects of urine-derived stem cells in neurological and musculoskeletal diseases. Atypical cervical spondylotic radiculopathy resulting in a hypertensive emergency during cervical extension: A case report and review of literature. Clinical implications of reconsideration of enthesitis/enthesopathy/enthesial erosion, as tendon attachment-localized avulsions and stress fracture equivalents. Conversion hip arthroplasty for failed nailing of intertrochanteric fracture: Reflections on some important aspects. Evidence-based orthobiologic practice: Current evidence review and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1