Are intensified job demands positive challenges for employees? Associations with work engagement in different occupational samples

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR International Journal of Manpower Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1108/ijm-09-2023-0537
Saija Mauno, Taru Feldt, Mari Herttalampi, Jaana Minkkinen
{"title":"Are intensified job demands positive challenges for employees? Associations with work engagement in different occupational samples","authors":"Saija Mauno, Taru Feldt, Mari Herttalampi, Jaana Minkkinen","doi":"10.1108/ijm-09-2023-0537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIntensified job demands (IJDs; work intensification, intensified job- and career-related planning and decision-making demands, and intensified learning demands) illustrate the intensification of working life. This study examined relationships between IJDs and work engagement.Design/methodology/approachNine diverse samples (n = 7,786) were analyzed separately via regression analysis by estimating linear and curvilinear relationships between IJDs and engagement.FindingsThe results showed that certain subdimensions of IJDs, i.e. intensified learning demands, related positively to engagement across several subsamples. Moreover, learning demands showed a curvilinear relationship with engagement in several subsamples; engagement was highest in a moderate level of learning demands whereas low and high levels of learning demands were associated with lower engagement. We also found that other subdimensions of IJDs did not show consistent positive relationships with engagement, and some of them were negatively associated with engagement.Research limitations/implicationsCross-sectional design.Practical implicationsOrganizations should consider what would be the optimal level of learning demands as excessive learning demands can be detrimental to employees’ engagement.Originality/valueThis is a first study focusing on different manifestations of the intensification of working life, operationalized via IJDs, and their curvilinear relationships with engagement by applying a multi-sample design.","PeriodicalId":47915,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Manpower","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Manpower","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-09-2023-0537","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeIntensified job demands (IJDs; work intensification, intensified job- and career-related planning and decision-making demands, and intensified learning demands) illustrate the intensification of working life. This study examined relationships between IJDs and work engagement.Design/methodology/approachNine diverse samples (n = 7,786) were analyzed separately via regression analysis by estimating linear and curvilinear relationships between IJDs and engagement.FindingsThe results showed that certain subdimensions of IJDs, i.e. intensified learning demands, related positively to engagement across several subsamples. Moreover, learning demands showed a curvilinear relationship with engagement in several subsamples; engagement was highest in a moderate level of learning demands whereas low and high levels of learning demands were associated with lower engagement. We also found that other subdimensions of IJDs did not show consistent positive relationships with engagement, and some of them were negatively associated with engagement.Research limitations/implicationsCross-sectional design.Practical implicationsOrganizations should consider what would be the optimal level of learning demands as excessive learning demands can be detrimental to employees’ engagement.Originality/valueThis is a first study focusing on different manifestations of the intensification of working life, operationalized via IJDs, and their curvilinear relationships with engagement by applying a multi-sample design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强化的工作要求对员工来说是积极的挑战吗?不同职业样本中工作投入的相关性
目的强化工作要求(IJDs;工作强化、与工作和职业相关的规划和决策要求强化以及学习要求强化)说明了工作生活的强化。本研究探讨了 IJDs 与工作投入度之间的关系。研究结果表明,IJDs 的某些子维度(即强化学习需求)与多个子样本的工作投入度呈正相关。此外,在几个子样本中,学习要求与参与度呈曲线关系;中等程度的学习要求与参与度关系最大,而低程度和高程度的学习要求与参与度关系较小。我们还发现,IJDs 的其他子维度与敬业度并没有呈现出一致的正相关关系,其中一些子维度与敬业度呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
11.40%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ■Employee welfare ■Human aspects during the introduction of technology ■Human resource recruitment, retention and development ■National and international aspects of HR planning ■Objectives of human resource planning and forecasting requirements ■The working environment
期刊最新文献
Intersectional analysis of the labour market impacts of COVID on women with young children and in low-skilled jobs Intellectual capital as a driver of value creation in Serbian entrepreneurial firms Tax incentives for jobs: bang for the buck or wasted resources? Employment discrimination against transgender women in England Impact of green self-managed teams on firm’s performance: a moderating serial mediation model from an emerging market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1