Farmer perceptions, knowledge, and management of fall armyworm in maize production in Uganda

IF 2.4 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Frontiers in insect science Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.3389/finsc.2024.1345139
Thomas Lapaka Odong, Isaac Obongo, Richard Ariong, Stella E. Adur, Stella A. Adumo, Denish Oyaro Onen, Bob I. Rwotonen, Michael H. Otim
{"title":"Farmer perceptions, knowledge, and management of fall armyworm in maize production in Uganda","authors":"Thomas Lapaka Odong, Isaac Obongo, Richard Ariong, Stella E. Adur, Stella A. Adumo, Denish Oyaro Onen, Bob I. Rwotonen, Michael H. Otim","doi":"10.3389/finsc.2024.1345139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith), fall armyworm (FAW), a polyphagous Noctuid pest, was first reported in Uganda in 2016. Farmers were trained to identify and manage the pest, but there was a lack of information on farmer knowledge, perceptions and practices deployed to control it. Therefore, we conducted a survey to assess maize farmers’ knowledge, perceptions and management of the pest during the invasion. We interviewed 1,289 maize farmers from 10 maize-growing agro-ecological zones (AEZ) of Uganda using well-structured questionnaires. The data were analyzed using R version 4.2.3. The respondents faced many constraints, including pests, drought, poor soils and labor constraints. Among the pests, FAW was ranked by most (85%) of the respondents as the number one pest problem in maize, and some farmers reported having noticed it way back in 2014. By 2018, more than 90% of the farmers had seen or heard about FAW, and about 80% saw FAW in their fields. The most common FAW symptoms reported by maize farmers were windowing, near tunnel damage, and holes on the cobs. The developmental stages of FAW identified by farmers included eggs (10%), young larvae (78.7%), mature larvae (73.5%) and adult moths (6.7%). Insecticides were the major control tactic, although some farmers used plant extracts, hand-picking, sand, and ash. Farmers sourced information on FAW from various sources, including fellow farmers, radio/TV, extension agents, input dealers, print media, research and NGO extension. There is a need to package clear and uniform information for the farmers and to develop and promote a sustainable solution for FAW management, including harnessing biological control and cultural practices.","PeriodicalId":517424,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in insect science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in insect science","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2024.1345139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith), fall armyworm (FAW), a polyphagous Noctuid pest, was first reported in Uganda in 2016. Farmers were trained to identify and manage the pest, but there was a lack of information on farmer knowledge, perceptions and practices deployed to control it. Therefore, we conducted a survey to assess maize farmers’ knowledge, perceptions and management of the pest during the invasion. We interviewed 1,289 maize farmers from 10 maize-growing agro-ecological zones (AEZ) of Uganda using well-structured questionnaires. The data were analyzed using R version 4.2.3. The respondents faced many constraints, including pests, drought, poor soils and labor constraints. Among the pests, FAW was ranked by most (85%) of the respondents as the number one pest problem in maize, and some farmers reported having noticed it way back in 2014. By 2018, more than 90% of the farmers had seen or heard about FAW, and about 80% saw FAW in their fields. The most common FAW symptoms reported by maize farmers were windowing, near tunnel damage, and holes on the cobs. The developmental stages of FAW identified by farmers included eggs (10%), young larvae (78.7%), mature larvae (73.5%) and adult moths (6.7%). Insecticides were the major control tactic, although some farmers used plant extracts, hand-picking, sand, and ash. Farmers sourced information on FAW from various sources, including fellow farmers, radio/TV, extension agents, input dealers, print media, research and NGO extension. There is a need to package clear and uniform information for the farmers and to develop and promote a sustainable solution for FAW management, including harnessing biological control and cultural practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌干达农民对玉米生产中秋绵虫的看法、知识和管理
蚜蝇(Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith))、秋军虫(FAW)是一种多食性夜蛾类害虫,2016年首次在乌干达报告。农民接受了识别和管理该害虫的培训,但缺乏有关农民对该害虫的认识、看法和防治方法的信息。因此,我们开展了一项调查,以评估玉米种植者在虫害入侵期间对该虫害的认识、看法和管理。我们使用结构合理的调查问卷,对乌干达 10 个玉米种植农业生态区 (AEZ) 的 1289 位玉米种植者进行了访谈。我们使用 R 4.2.3 版本对数据进行了分析。受访者面临许多限制因素,包括虫害、干旱、土壤贫瘠和劳动力限制。在虫害中,大多数受访者(85%)将蚜虫列为玉米的头号虫害问题,一些农民称早在 2014 年就注意到了这一问题。到 2018 年,90% 以上的农民看到或听说过 FAW,约 80% 的农民在田间看到 FAW。玉米种植者报告的最常见的田间虫害症状是开窗、近隧道损害和玉米棒上的孔洞。农民发现的虫害发育阶段包括卵(10%)、幼虫(78.7%)、老熟幼虫(73.5%)和成蛾(6.7%)。杀虫剂是主要的防治手段,但也有一些农民使用植物提取物、人工采摘、沙子和草木灰。农民从各种渠道获取有关虫害防治的信息,包括农民朋友、广播/电视、推广人员、投入品经销商、印刷媒体、研究和非政府组织推广。有必要为农民提供清晰统一的信息,并制定和推广可持续的草害管理解决方案,包括利用生物控制和文化习俗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A universal artificial diet for corn rootworm (Diabrotica spp.) larval biopesticide assays. The impact of non-lethal doses of pyriproxyfen on male and female Aedes albopictus reproductive fitness. Identification of specific reference gene for normalization of RT-qPCR data in rhythmic gene expression studies of the effect of developmental hormone antagonist in postembryonic development in Bombyx mori. Lablab (Lablab purpureus L.) genotypes and field margin vegetation influence bean aphids and their natural enemies. Farmer perceptions, knowledge, and management of fall armyworm in maize production in Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1