Neuromodulatory effects of parietal high-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation on network-level activity serving fluid intelligence

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Physiology-London Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1113/JP286004
Tara D. Erker, Yasra Arif, Jason A. John, Christine M. Embury, Kennedy A. Kress, Seth D. Springer, Hannah J. Okelberry, Kellen M. McDonald, Giorgia Picci, Alex I. Wiesman, Tony W. Wilson
{"title":"Neuromodulatory effects of parietal high-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation on network-level activity serving fluid intelligence","authors":"Tara D. Erker,&nbsp;Yasra Arif,&nbsp;Jason A. John,&nbsp;Christine M. Embury,&nbsp;Kennedy A. Kress,&nbsp;Seth D. Springer,&nbsp;Hannah J. Okelberry,&nbsp;Kellen M. McDonald,&nbsp;Giorgia Picci,&nbsp;Alex I. Wiesman,&nbsp;Tony W. Wilson","doi":"10.1113/JP286004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <div>Fluid intelligence (G<i>f</i>) involves rational thinking skills and requires the integration of information from different cortical regions to resolve novel complex problems. The effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on G<i>f</i> have been studied in attempts to improve G<i>f</i>, but such studies are rare and the few existing have reached conflicting conclusions. The parieto-frontal integration theory of intelligence (P-FIT) postulates that the parietal and frontal lobes play a critical role in G<i>f</i>. To investigate the suggested role of parietal cortices, we applied high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to the left and right parietal cortices of 39 healthy adults (age 19–33 years) for 20 min in three separate sessions (left active, right active and sham). After completing the stimulation session, the participants completed a logical reasoning task based on Raven's Progressive Matrices during magnetoencephalography. Significant neural responses at the sensor level across all stimulation conditions were imaged using a beamformer. Whole-brain, spectrally constrained functional connectivity was then computed to examine the network-level activity. Behaviourally, we found that participants were significantly more accurate following left compared to right parietal stimulation. Regarding neural findings, we found significant HD-tDCS montage-related effects in brain networks thought to be critical for P-FIT, including parieto-occipital, fronto-occipital, fronto-parietal and occipito-cerebellar connectivity during task performance. In conclusion, our findings showed that left parietal stimulation improved abstract reasoning abilities relative to right parietal stimulation and support both P-FIT and the neural efficiency hypothesis.\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Abstract reasoning is a critical component of fluid intelligence and is known to be served by multispectral oscillatory activity in the fronto-parietal cortices.</li>\n \n <li>Recent studies have aimed to improve abstract reasoning abilities and fluid intelligence overall through behavioural training, but the results have been mixed.</li>\n \n <li>High-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation (HD-tDCS) applied to the parietal cortices modulated task performance and neural oscillations during abstract reasoning.</li>\n \n <li>Left parietal stimulation resulted in increased accuracy and decreased functional connectivity between occipital regions and frontal, parietal, and cerebellar regions.</li>\n \n <li>Future studies should investigate whether HD-tDCS alters abstract reasoning abilities in those who exhibit declines in performance, such as healthy ageing populations.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"602 12","pages":"2917-2930"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP286004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluid intelligence (Gf) involves rational thinking skills and requires the integration of information from different cortical regions to resolve novel complex problems. The effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on Gf have been studied in attempts to improve Gf, but such studies are rare and the few existing have reached conflicting conclusions. The parieto-frontal integration theory of intelligence (P-FIT) postulates that the parietal and frontal lobes play a critical role in Gf. To investigate the suggested role of parietal cortices, we applied high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to the left and right parietal cortices of 39 healthy adults (age 19–33 years) for 20 min in three separate sessions (left active, right active and sham). After completing the stimulation session, the participants completed a logical reasoning task based on Raven's Progressive Matrices during magnetoencephalography. Significant neural responses at the sensor level across all stimulation conditions were imaged using a beamformer. Whole-brain, spectrally constrained functional connectivity was then computed to examine the network-level activity. Behaviourally, we found that participants were significantly more accurate following left compared to right parietal stimulation. Regarding neural findings, we found significant HD-tDCS montage-related effects in brain networks thought to be critical for P-FIT, including parieto-occipital, fronto-occipital, fronto-parietal and occipito-cerebellar connectivity during task performance. In conclusion, our findings showed that left parietal stimulation improved abstract reasoning abilities relative to right parietal stimulation and support both P-FIT and the neural efficiency hypothesis.

Key points

  • Abstract reasoning is a critical component of fluid intelligence and is known to be served by multispectral oscillatory activity in the fronto-parietal cortices.
  • Recent studies have aimed to improve abstract reasoning abilities and fluid intelligence overall through behavioural training, but the results have been mixed.
  • High-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation (HD-tDCS) applied to the parietal cortices modulated task performance and neural oscillations during abstract reasoning.
  • Left parietal stimulation resulted in increased accuracy and decreased functional connectivity between occipital regions and frontal, parietal, and cerebellar regions.
  • Future studies should investigate whether HD-tDCS alters abstract reasoning abilities in those who exhibit declines in performance, such as healthy ageing populations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顶叶高清晰度经颅直流电刺激对服务于流体智能的网络水平活动的神经调节作用。
流体智能(Gf)涉及理性思维能力,需要整合来自不同大脑皮层区域的信息来解决复杂的新问题。为了提高流体智力,人们研究了非侵入性脑部刺激对流体智力的影响,但这类研究并不多见,而且现有的少数研究得出了相互矛盾的结论。智力的顶叶-额叶整合理论(P-FIT)假设顶叶和额叶在Gf中起着关键作用。为了研究顶叶皮层的作用,我们对 39 名健康成年人(19-33 岁)的左右顶叶皮层分别进行了 20 分钟的高清晰度经颅直流电刺激(HD-tDCS),分三次进行(左侧激活、右侧激活和假刺激)。刺激疗程结束后,受试者在脑磁图检查过程中完成了一项基于瑞文渐进矩阵的逻辑推理任务。使用波束成形器对所有刺激条件下传感器水平的显著神经反应进行了成像。然后计算全脑频谱约束功能连接,以检查网络水平的活动。从行为学角度来看,我们发现参与者在接受左顶叶刺激后的准确性明显高于右顶叶刺激。关于神经方面的研究结果,我们发现 HD-tDCS 单调阶段对被认为对 P-FIT 至关重要的大脑网络有显著的影响,包括任务执行过程中的顶叶-枕叶、前顶叶-枕叶、前顶叶-顶叶和枕-小脑连接。总之,我们的研究结果表明,相对于右顶叶刺激,左顶叶刺激能提高抽象推理能力,并支持 P-FIT 和神经效率假说。关键点:抽象推理是流体智能的一个重要组成部分,已知前顶叶皮层的多谱振荡活动有助于抽象推理。最近的研究旨在通过行为训练提高抽象推理能力和整体流体智能,但结果参差不齐。应用于顶叶皮层的高清晰度经颅直流电刺激(HD-tDCS)调节了抽象推理过程中的任务表现和神经振荡。刺激左顶叶可提高准确性,并降低枕叶区与额叶、顶叶和小脑区之间的功能连接。未来的研究应探讨HD-tDCS是否会改变那些表现出抽象推理能力下降的人群(如健康的老年人群)的抽象推理能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Low-dose lithium supplementation promotes musculoskeletal and metabolic health in ovariectomized female mice. Maternal late gestation undernutrition in sheep is associated with increased ductus venosus shunting and reduced cerebral oxygen consumption. Transcranial photobiomodulation with near-infrared laser induces analgesia in rats. Impact of time-restricted feeding on metabolic health and adipose tissue metabolism in aged female mice with high-fat diet-induced obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1