Prospective Validation of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, d ‐Dimer, and Clinical Scales for Acute Large‐Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke Detection

Yasir Durrani, Jakob V. E. Gerstl, Danielle Murphy, Ashley Harris, Imane Saali, Toby Gropen, Shashank Shekhar, Ari D. Kappel, Nirav J. Patel, Rose Du, Rodolfo E. Alcedo Guardia, Juan C. Vicenty‐Padilla, Adam A. Dmytriw, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Saef Izzy, Allauddin Khan, Mohammed A. Aziz‐Sultan, David S. Liebeskind, Jason M. Davies, Adnan H. Siddiqui, Edoardo Gaude, Joshua D. Bernstock
{"title":"Prospective Validation of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein,\n d\n ‐Dimer, and Clinical Scales for Acute Large‐Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke Detection","authors":"Yasir Durrani, Jakob V. E. Gerstl, Danielle Murphy, Ashley Harris, Imane Saali, Toby Gropen, Shashank Shekhar, Ari D. Kappel, Nirav J. Patel, Rose Du, Rodolfo E. Alcedo Guardia, Juan C. Vicenty‐Padilla, Adam A. Dmytriw, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Saef Izzy, Allauddin Khan, Mohammed A. Aziz‐Sultan, David S. Liebeskind, Jason M. Davies, Adnan H. Siddiqui, Edoardo Gaude, Joshua D. Bernstock","doi":"10.1161/svin.123.001304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Large‐vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. We have previously described a novel tool for acute LVO detection that combines blood‐based biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein and\n d\n ‐dimer) with stroke severity scales to achieve high accuracy. Accordingly, the present study sought to prospectively validate cutoff values that we had previously established for biomarkers and scales.\n \n \n \n \n \n The TIME (Testing for Identification Markers of Stroke) trial was designed as a prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study. All ambulance‐identified stroke code activations <18 hours from symptom onset were recruited at Brandon Regional Hospital (Brandon, FL) between May 2021 and August 2022. Previously determined cutoff concentrations of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (213 pg/mL) and\n d\n ‐dimer (600 ng/mL) were used in combination with prehospital stroke scales to detect LVO. We compared rates of LVO detection against a reference standard using computed tomography/magnetic resonance angiography.\n \n \n \n \n \n A total of 382 patients with suspected stroke were recruited. The final cohort was composed of 323 patients with suspected stroke with the following distribution: LVO ischemic stroke (n = 29, 9%), non‐LVO ischemic stroke (n = 48, 15%), hemorrhagic stroke (n = 13, 4%), transient ischemic attack (n = 12, 3.9%), and stroke mimics (n = 220, 68.1%). Combining blood‐based biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein and\n d\n ‐dimer) with the scale field assessment stroke triage for emergency destination yielded the best performance for LVO detection, with specificity of 94% and sensitivity of 71%. Performance was found to be higher in a subanalysis focusing on patients presenting <6 hours from symptom onset, with 93% specificity and 81% sensitivity. Critically, application of the biomarker and stroke scale algorithms ruled out all patients with hemorrhage.\n \n \n \n \n \n The present work prospectively validated the potential utility of previously defined glial fibrillary acidic protein and\n d\n ‐dimer cutoff levels (ie, 213 pg/mL and 600 ng/mL, respectively), demonstrating their value for discrimination of LVO stroke from differential diagnoses during code stroke workups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04292600.)\n \n","PeriodicalId":21977,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","volume":"35 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.001304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large‐vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. We have previously described a novel tool for acute LVO detection that combines blood‐based biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein and d ‐dimer) with stroke severity scales to achieve high accuracy. Accordingly, the present study sought to prospectively validate cutoff values that we had previously established for biomarkers and scales. The TIME (Testing for Identification Markers of Stroke) trial was designed as a prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study. All ambulance‐identified stroke code activations <18 hours from symptom onset were recruited at Brandon Regional Hospital (Brandon, FL) between May 2021 and August 2022. Previously determined cutoff concentrations of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (213 pg/mL) and d ‐dimer (600 ng/mL) were used in combination with prehospital stroke scales to detect LVO. We compared rates of LVO detection against a reference standard using computed tomography/magnetic resonance angiography. A total of 382 patients with suspected stroke were recruited. The final cohort was composed of 323 patients with suspected stroke with the following distribution: LVO ischemic stroke (n = 29, 9%), non‐LVO ischemic stroke (n = 48, 15%), hemorrhagic stroke (n = 13, 4%), transient ischemic attack (n = 12, 3.9%), and stroke mimics (n = 220, 68.1%). Combining blood‐based biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein and d ‐dimer) with the scale field assessment stroke triage for emergency destination yielded the best performance for LVO detection, with specificity of 94% and sensitivity of 71%. Performance was found to be higher in a subanalysis focusing on patients presenting <6 hours from symptom onset, with 93% specificity and 81% sensitivity. Critically, application of the biomarker and stroke scale algorithms ruled out all patients with hemorrhage. The present work prospectively validated the potential utility of previously defined glial fibrillary acidic protein and d ‐dimer cutoff levels (ie, 213 pg/mL and 600 ng/mL, respectively), demonstrating their value for discrimination of LVO stroke from differential diagnoses during code stroke workups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04292600.)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前瞻性验证胶质纤维酸性蛋白、d -二聚体和临床量表对急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中的检测作用
大血管闭塞(LVO)缺血性卒中是导致严重发病和死亡的重要原因。我们曾介绍过一种用于急性 LVO 检测的新型工具,该工具将血液生物标记物(胶质纤维酸性蛋白和 d -dimer)与卒中严重程度量表相结合,以达到较高的准确性。因此,本研究试图对我们之前为生物标志物和量表确定的临界值进行前瞻性验证。 TIME(卒中识别标志物检测)试验是一项前瞻性观察诊断准确性研究。2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 8 月期间,布兰登地区医院(佛罗里达州布兰登市)招募了所有救护车识别的卒中代码激活患者,他们的症状发生时间均小于 18 小时。将之前确定的血浆胶质纤维酸性蛋白(213 pg/mL)和d -dimer(600 ng/mL)的临界浓度与院前卒中量表结合使用,以检测LVO。我们将 LVO 的检测率与使用计算机断层扫描/磁共振血管造影的参考标准进行了比较。 共招募了 382 名疑似中风患者。最终组群由 323 名疑似中风患者组成,分布情况如下:LVO 缺血性卒中(n = 29,9%)、非 LVO 缺血性卒中(n = 48,15%)、出血性卒中(n = 13,4%)、短暂性脑缺血发作(n = 12,3.9%)和模拟卒中(n = 220,68.1%)。将基于血液的生物标记物(胶质纤维酸性蛋白和 d -二聚体)与量表现场评估中风急诊分流相结合,对 LVO 的检测效果最佳,特异性为 94%,灵敏度为 71%。在一项针对症状出现后 6 小时内就诊患者的子分析中发现,该指标的特异性和敏感性分别为 93% 和 81%,性能更高。重要的是,应用生物标记物和卒中量表算法排除了所有出血患者。 本研究前瞻性地验证了之前定义的胶质纤维酸性蛋白和 d -dimer 临界值(即分别为 213 pg/mL 和 600 ng/mL)的潜在效用,证明了它们在卒中代码检查中从鉴别诊断中区分 LVO 卒中的价值。(ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT04292600)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostication Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Modified Hunt and Hess Grading Scale Intra‐arterial Selective Bevacizumab Administration in the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Early Experience in 12 Hemispheres Sex Disparities in Mortality After Endovascular Therapy in Large Core Infarcts Predicting Recanalization Failure With Conventional Devices During Endovascular Treatment Related to Vessel Occlusion Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1