Defamilization? Not for everyone. Unequal labour-market participation among informal caregivers in Europe

IF 4.7 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1177/09589287241251990
Miriam Laschinski
{"title":"Defamilization? Not for everyone. Unequal labour-market participation among informal caregivers in Europe","authors":"Miriam Laschinski","doi":"10.1177/09589287241251990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing care dependencies among the elderly due to population ageing in Europe challenge the labour-market participation of informal caregivers. While familiarized care regimes incentivize family caregiving by providing many cash-for-care-benefits, resulting in reduced labour supply, defamiliarized care regimes allocate more public spending to care infrastructure, alleviating the care responsibilities placed on family members. At the same time, care provision on the micro-level is distributed unequally across gender, age, and socioeconomic status. The question then emerges: Does the labour-market participation of informal caregivers vary between and within countries depending on the social-expenditure policy of welfare states? To answer this research question, a multilevel design was used, employing SHARE data and macro-indicators from OECD and Eurostat databases. The results reveal higher probabilities of labour-market participation for informal caregivers in general when social expenditures on formal care infrastructure are higher. However, labour-market participation was observed as being unequally distributed among the heterogeneous group of persons with and without caregiving duties. Women and individuals of lower socioeconomic status did not benefit from social expenditures in the same way as their counterparts, leading to lower levels of labour-market participation.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"71 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287241251990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing care dependencies among the elderly due to population ageing in Europe challenge the labour-market participation of informal caregivers. While familiarized care regimes incentivize family caregiving by providing many cash-for-care-benefits, resulting in reduced labour supply, defamiliarized care regimes allocate more public spending to care infrastructure, alleviating the care responsibilities placed on family members. At the same time, care provision on the micro-level is distributed unequally across gender, age, and socioeconomic status. The question then emerges: Does the labour-market participation of informal caregivers vary between and within countries depending on the social-expenditure policy of welfare states? To answer this research question, a multilevel design was used, employing SHARE data and macro-indicators from OECD and Eurostat databases. The results reveal higher probabilities of labour-market participation for informal caregivers in general when social expenditures on formal care infrastructure are higher. However, labour-market participation was observed as being unequally distributed among the heterogeneous group of persons with and without caregiving duties. Women and individuals of lower socioeconomic status did not benefit from social expenditures in the same way as their counterparts, leading to lower levels of labour-market participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
去污?并非人人如此。欧洲非正规照顾者参与劳动力市场的不平等现象
在欧洲,由于人口老龄化,老年人对护理的依赖越来越大,这对非正规护理人员参与劳动力市场提出了挑战。熟悉的护理制度通过提供许多现金护理福利来激励家庭护理,导致劳动力供应减少,而不熟悉的护理制度则将更多的公共支出分配给护理基础设施,减轻家庭成员的护理责任。与此同时,微观层面的护理服务在不同性别、年龄和社会经济地位的人群中分配不均。问题随之而来:非正规护理人员参与劳动力市场的情况是否会因福利国家的社会支出政策而在国家之间和国家内部有所不同?为了回答这个研究问题,我们采用了多层次设计,使用了 SHARE 数据以及经合组织(OECD)和欧盟统计局(Eurostat)数据库中的宏观指标。研究结果显示,当正规护理基础设施的社会支出较高时,非正规护理人员参与劳动力市场的概率普遍较高。然而,在有和没有照顾责任的异质群体中,劳动力市场参与的分布不均。妇女和社会经济地位较低的个人从社会支出中获益的方式与其同类人不同,导致其劳动力市场参与水平较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.
期刊最新文献
Decellularized Dermis ECM-Based Melanoma-on-a-Chip Model with Integrated Lymphatic and Vascular Networks for High-Throughput Drug Testing. Physically Cross-Linked Hydrogels Based on Poly(vinyl alcohol) and Gelatin for Independent Modulation of Mechanical Cues in Cell Adhesion Studies. Photobiomodulation Therapy with Zinc Oxide/Pheophorbide-a Nanoflakes Enhances Neurovascular Repair in Spinal Cord Injury Evidenced Using Photoacoustic Imaging. DNA-Templated Silver Nanoclusters Demonstrate Potent Antimicrobial Activity Against the Clinically Relevant Pathogens, Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Repurposing of Near-Infrared IR 808: A Promising Agent for the Treatment of Gram-Positive Bacteria Induced Endophthalmitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1