Swelling, Rupture and Endosomal Escape of Biological Nanoparticles Per Se and Those Fused with Liposomes in Acidic Environment

N. Ponomareva, S. Brezgin, I. Karandashov, A. Kostyusheva, Polina A. Demina, O. Slatinskaya, E. Bayurova, DN Silachev, Vadim S. Pokrovsky, V. Gegechkori, Evgeny V. Khaydukov, G. Maksimov, Anastasia S Frolova, I. Gordeychuk, Andrey A. Zamyatnin Jr., V.P. Chulanov, Alessandro Parodi, D. Kostyushev
{"title":"Swelling, Rupture and Endosomal Escape of Biological Nanoparticles Per Se and Those Fused with Liposomes in Acidic Environment","authors":"N. Ponomareva, S. Brezgin, I. Karandashov, A. Kostyusheva, Polina A. Demina, O. Slatinskaya, E. Bayurova, DN Silachev, Vadim S. Pokrovsky, V. Gegechkori, Evgeny V. Khaydukov, G. Maksimov, Anastasia S Frolova, I. Gordeychuk, Andrey A. Zamyatnin Jr., V.P. Chulanov, Alessandro Parodi, D. Kostyushev","doi":"10.3390/pharmaceutics16050667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biological nanoparticles (NPs), such as extracellular vesicles (EVs), exosome-mimetic nanovesicles (EMNVs) and nanoghosts (NGs), are perspective non-viral delivery vehicles for all types of therapeutic cargo. Biological NPs are renowned for their exceptional biocompatibility and safety, alongside their ease of functionalization, but a significant challenge arises when attempting to load therapeutic payloads, such as nucleic acids (NAs). One effective strategy involves fusing biological NPs with liposomes loaded with NAs, resulting in hybrid carriers that offer the benefits of both biological NPs and the capacity for high cargo loads. Despite their unique parameters, one of the major issues of virtually any nanoformulation is the ability to escape degradation in the compartment of endosomes and lysosomes which determines the overall efficiency of nanotherapeutics. In this study, we fabricated all major types of biological and hybrid NPs and studied their response to the acidic environment observed in the endolysosomal compartment. In this study, we show that EMNVs display increased protonation and swelling relative to EVs and NGs in an acidic environment. Furthermore, the hybrid NPs exhibit an even greater response compared to EMNVs. Short-term incubation of EMNVs in acidic pH corresponding to late endosomes and lysosomes again induces protonation and swelling, whereas hybrid NPs are ruptured, resulting in the decline in their quantities. Our findings demonstrate that in an acidic environment, there is enhanced rupture and release of vesicular cargo observed in hybrid EMNVs that are fused with liposomes compared to EMNVs alone. This was confirmed through PAGE electrophoresis analysis of mCherry protein loaded into nanoparticles. In vitro analysis of NPs colocalization with lysosomes in HepG2 cells demonstrated that EMNVs mostly avoid the endolysosomal compartment, whereas hybrid NPs escape it over time. To conclude, (1) hybrid biological NPs fused with liposomes appear more efficient in the endolysosomal escape via the mechanism of proton sponge-associated scavenging of protons by NPs, influx of counterions and water, and rupture of endo/lysosomes, but (2) EMNVs are much more efficient than hybrid NPs in actually avoiding the endolysosomal compartment in human cells. These results reveal biochemical differences across four major types of biological and hybrid NPs and indicate that EMNVs are more efficient in escaping or avoiding the endolysosomal compartment.","PeriodicalId":508088,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutics","volume":"55 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16050667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological nanoparticles (NPs), such as extracellular vesicles (EVs), exosome-mimetic nanovesicles (EMNVs) and nanoghosts (NGs), are perspective non-viral delivery vehicles for all types of therapeutic cargo. Biological NPs are renowned for their exceptional biocompatibility and safety, alongside their ease of functionalization, but a significant challenge arises when attempting to load therapeutic payloads, such as nucleic acids (NAs). One effective strategy involves fusing biological NPs with liposomes loaded with NAs, resulting in hybrid carriers that offer the benefits of both biological NPs and the capacity for high cargo loads. Despite their unique parameters, one of the major issues of virtually any nanoformulation is the ability to escape degradation in the compartment of endosomes and lysosomes which determines the overall efficiency of nanotherapeutics. In this study, we fabricated all major types of biological and hybrid NPs and studied their response to the acidic environment observed in the endolysosomal compartment. In this study, we show that EMNVs display increased protonation and swelling relative to EVs and NGs in an acidic environment. Furthermore, the hybrid NPs exhibit an even greater response compared to EMNVs. Short-term incubation of EMNVs in acidic pH corresponding to late endosomes and lysosomes again induces protonation and swelling, whereas hybrid NPs are ruptured, resulting in the decline in their quantities. Our findings demonstrate that in an acidic environment, there is enhanced rupture and release of vesicular cargo observed in hybrid EMNVs that are fused with liposomes compared to EMNVs alone. This was confirmed through PAGE electrophoresis analysis of mCherry protein loaded into nanoparticles. In vitro analysis of NPs colocalization with lysosomes in HepG2 cells demonstrated that EMNVs mostly avoid the endolysosomal compartment, whereas hybrid NPs escape it over time. To conclude, (1) hybrid biological NPs fused with liposomes appear more efficient in the endolysosomal escape via the mechanism of proton sponge-associated scavenging of protons by NPs, influx of counterions and water, and rupture of endo/lysosomes, but (2) EMNVs are much more efficient than hybrid NPs in actually avoiding the endolysosomal compartment in human cells. These results reveal biochemical differences across four major types of biological and hybrid NPs and indicate that EMNVs are more efficient in escaping or avoiding the endolysosomal compartment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物纳米颗粒本身以及与脂质体融合的纳米颗粒在酸性环境中的膨胀、破裂和内体逃逸
生物纳米颗粒(NPs),如细胞外囊泡(EVs)、仿外泌体纳米颗粒(EMNVs)和纳米幽灵(NGs),是各种类型治疗货物的非病毒递送载体。生物纳米颗粒以其优异的生物相容性和安全性以及易于功能化而闻名,但在尝试装载核酸(NAs)等治疗载荷时,却面临着巨大的挑战。一种有效的策略是将生物 NPs 与装载 NAs 的脂质体融合在一起,形成混合载体,既具有生物 NPs 的优点,又能装载大量货物。尽管纳米制剂具有独特的参数,但几乎所有纳米制剂的主要问题之一都是能否逃脱内体和溶酶体的降解,这决定了纳米治疗药物的整体效率。在这项研究中,我们制作了所有主要类型的生物和混合 NPs,并研究了它们对内溶酶体区室中观察到的酸性环境的反应。研究表明,在酸性环境中,EMNVs 的质子化和膨胀程度相对于 EVs 和 NGs 有所提高。此外,与 EMNVs 相比,混合 NPs 表现出更大的反应。将 EMNVs 短期培养在与晚期内体和溶酶体相对应的酸性 pH 环境中,会再次诱发质子化和膨胀,而杂交 NPs 则会破裂,导致其数量下降。我们的研究结果表明,在酸性环境中,与单独的EMNV相比,与脂质体融合的混合EMNV的破裂和囊泡货物的释放都有所增强。通过对装入纳米颗粒的 mCherry 蛋白进行 PAGE 电泳分析,证实了这一点。对 HepG2 细胞中 NPs 与溶酶体共定位的体外分析表明,EMNVs 大都避开了溶酶体内腔,而混合 NPs 则随着时间的推移避开了溶酶体内腔。总之,(1) 与脂质体融合的混合生物 NPs 通过与质子海绵相关的 NPs 清除质子、反离子和水的流入以及内溶酶体/溶酶体破裂的机制,在溶酶体内逃逸方面似乎更有效率,但 (2) EMNV 在实际避开人体细胞溶酶体内室方面比混合 NPs 更有效率。这些结果揭示了四种主要生物 NPs 和混合 NPs 的生化差异,表明 EMNV 在逃离或避开内溶酶体区室方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Increase in the Plasticity of Microcrystalline Cellulose Spheres’ When Loaded with a Plasticizer Chemodynamic Therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme and Perspectives Antitumor Activity of a Pyrrolobenzodiazepine Antibody–Drug Conjugate Targeting LGR5 in Preclinical Models of Neuroblastoma Advancements in Insulin Pumps: A Comprehensive Exploration of Insulin Pump Systems, Technologies, and Future Directions Spray-Dried Nanolipid Powders for Pulmonary Drug Delivery: A Comprehensive Mini Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1