Lukas’ evangelium, fortolket af Niels Willert

Q4 Arts and Humanities Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.7146/dtt.v87i2.145340
Jesper Tang Nielsen
{"title":"Lukas’ evangelium, fortolket af Niels Willert","authors":"Jesper Tang Nielsen","doi":"10.7146/dtt.v87i2.145340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reviews Niels Willert’s commentary on the Gospel of Luke. On the one hand, the book presents a solid traditional analysis of the gospel. The interpretation lives up to international research. It is welcome in a Danish context and will be of benefit for many readers of the New Testament. On the other hand, it has a provocative profile and challenges accepted views. It promotes controversial ideas: It sees Luke-Acts as one single work in two volumes. It dates the Lukan writings extremely late, i.e. 120-140. It adheres to the Farrer-hypothesis concerning the synoptic problem. It takes the Gospel of John to be among Luke’s sources. These ideas are discussed critically in the review, and arguments are raised against the late dating and the relation to the Fourth Gospel. However, the conclusion is that these hypotheses do not affect the exegesis of the individual pericopes. Therefore, the commentary is warmly recommended for all serious readers of the Gospel of Luke.","PeriodicalId":38473,"journal":{"name":"Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/dtt.v87i2.145340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reviews Niels Willert’s commentary on the Gospel of Luke. On the one hand, the book presents a solid traditional analysis of the gospel. The interpretation lives up to international research. It is welcome in a Danish context and will be of benefit for many readers of the New Testament. On the other hand, it has a provocative profile and challenges accepted views. It promotes controversial ideas: It sees Luke-Acts as one single work in two volumes. It dates the Lukan writings extremely late, i.e. 120-140. It adheres to the Farrer-hypothesis concerning the synoptic problem. It takes the Gospel of John to be among Luke’s sources. These ideas are discussed critically in the review, and arguments are raised against the late dating and the relation to the Fourth Gospel. However, the conclusion is that these hypotheses do not affect the exegesis of the individual pericopes. Therefore, the commentary is warmly recommended for all serious readers of the Gospel of Luke.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼尔斯-威勒特解读的《路加福音
文章回顾了尼尔斯-威勒特对《路加福音》的评论。一方面,该书对福音书进行了扎实的传统分析。该书的解释符合国际研究标准。它在丹麦的语境中很受欢迎,并将使许多新约读者受益。另一方面,该书具有挑衅性,对公认的观点提出了挑战。它提倡有争议的观点:它将《路加福音》和《使徒行传》视为两卷本的单一作品。它将路加著作的年代定得很晚,即 120-140 年。它坚持关于对观问题的法勒假说。该书认为约翰福音是路加福音的来源之一。评论中对这些观点进行了批判性讨论,并提出了反对晚期年代和与第四卷福音书关系的论据。然而,结论是这些假设并不影响对个别经文的注释。因此,我们热忱地向所有认真阅读《路加福音》的读者推荐这本评注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift
Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Joachim Wiewiura (red.): Den politiske filosofis historie. Frem til 1600 Christine Mundhenk (red.): Melanchthons Briefwechsel, Band T 23: Texte 6691-7056 (1553), hg. von Matthias Dall’ Asta, Heidi Hein, Regine Klar, Christine Mundhenk Holger Villadsen: Kristus- Baggers Alterbog 1688. Forhistorie, indledning og tekstudgave Det er Herren, der styrer en mands gang Fra studienummer til hyrde for en menighed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1