Factor XI inhibitors: a new option for the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis

Marcello Di Nisio, Matteo Candeloro, Nicola Potere, Ettore Porreca, J. I. Weitz
{"title":"Factor XI inhibitors: a new option for the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis","authors":"Marcello Di Nisio, Matteo Candeloro, Nicola Potere, Ettore Porreca, J. I. Weitz","doi":"10.4081/btvb.2024.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a relatively common complication in cancer patients with potentially dire consequences. Anticoagulants are the mainstay of treatment of cancer-associated VTE. The anticoagulants most often used are low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral factor (F) Xa inhibitors, which include apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. Most guidelines recommend primary VTE prophylaxis with LMWH, apixaban, or rivaroxaban after abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery, or in high-risk ambulatory cancer patients. Both oral FXa inhibitors and LMWH have limitations. LMWH requires daily subcutaneous injections, and because of its renal clearance, its use may be problematic in patients with severe kidney disease. The risk of bleeding with oral FXa inhibitors may be higher than with LMWH in patients with intraluminal gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancers. Other problems with oral FXa inhibitors include potential drug-drug interactions and dosing issues in patients with thrombocytopenia or severe kidney or liver disease. Therefore, there remains a need for convenient and safer anticoagulants for VTE treatment in cancer patients. FXI has emerged as a potentially safer target for anticoagulants than FXa because FXI is essential for thrombosis, but mostly dispensable for hemostasis. This review summarizes the currently available therapeutic options for cancer-associated VTE, highlights knowledge gaps, and discusses the potential of FXI inhibitors to address key unmet clinical needs in this vulnerable patient population.","PeriodicalId":517891,"journal":{"name":"Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/btvb.2024.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a relatively common complication in cancer patients with potentially dire consequences. Anticoagulants are the mainstay of treatment of cancer-associated VTE. The anticoagulants most often used are low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral factor (F) Xa inhibitors, which include apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. Most guidelines recommend primary VTE prophylaxis with LMWH, apixaban, or rivaroxaban after abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery, or in high-risk ambulatory cancer patients. Both oral FXa inhibitors and LMWH have limitations. LMWH requires daily subcutaneous injections, and because of its renal clearance, its use may be problematic in patients with severe kidney disease. The risk of bleeding with oral FXa inhibitors may be higher than with LMWH in patients with intraluminal gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancers. Other problems with oral FXa inhibitors include potential drug-drug interactions and dosing issues in patients with thrombocytopenia or severe kidney or liver disease. Therefore, there remains a need for convenient and safer anticoagulants for VTE treatment in cancer patients. FXI has emerged as a potentially safer target for anticoagulants than FXa because FXI is essential for thrombosis, but mostly dispensable for hemostasis. This review summarizes the currently available therapeutic options for cancer-associated VTE, highlights knowledge gaps, and discusses the potential of FXI inhibitors to address key unmet clinical needs in this vulnerable patient population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因子 XI 抑制剂:预防和治疗癌症相关血栓的新选择
静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是癌症患者比较常见的并发症,可能会造成严重后果。抗凝剂是治疗癌症相关 VTE 的主要药物。最常用的抗凝剂是低分子量肝素(LMWH)和直接口服因子(F)Xa 抑制剂,包括阿哌沙班、依度沙班和利伐沙班。大多数指南建议在腹部或盆腔癌症手术后或高风险非卧床癌症患者使用 LMWH、阿哌沙班或利伐沙班进行 VTE 一级预防。口服 FXa 抑制剂和 LMWH 都有其局限性。LMWH 需要每天皮下注射,由于其肾脏清除率较高,在严重肾病患者中使用可能会有问题。对于患有腔内胃肠道或泌尿生殖系统癌症的患者,口服 FXa 抑制剂的出血风险可能高于 LMWH。口服 FXa 抑制剂的其他问题包括潜在的药物相互作用,以及血小板减少症或严重肝肾疾病患者的剂量问题。因此,癌症患者仍需要更方便、更安全的抗凝剂来治疗 VTE。与 FXa 相比,FXI 有可能成为更安全的抗凝剂靶点,因为 FXI 对血栓形成至关重要,但对止血却大多可有可无。本综述总结了癌症相关 VTE 的现有治疗方案,强调了知识差距,并讨论了 FXI 抑制剂在满足这一脆弱患者群体尚未满足的关键临床需求方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ankle brachial index for the diagnosis of asymptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease Welcome to the 12th ICTHIC! Identifying novel biomarkers using proteomics to predict cancer-associated thrombosis Cancer complicated by thrombosis and thrombocytopenia: still a therapeutic dilemma Venous thromboembolism and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1