Exploring Health Information And Management System Trends Among Healthcare Workers At Kenyatta National Hospital

SALIM OMAMBIA
{"title":"Exploring Health Information And Management System Trends Among Healthcare Workers At Kenyatta National Hospital","authors":"SALIM OMAMBIA","doi":"10.58806/ijhmr.2024.v3i05n04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The project aimed to call to mind the exploration of health management and information systems among healthcare workers at Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya. Design setting: The investigation deployed a cross-sectional study. Subjects or participants: A sample total of 263 respondents was calculated using the Krecie and Morgan formula for the quantitative study. A strict inclusion criterion was followed to select the respondents from all trained health personnel in Kenyatta National Hospital. The study utilized an interview schedule. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 while qualitative data was analyzed on themes developed. Data presentation was in the form of quantitative statistics such as frequency distribution, percentages and tables. Qualitative results were presented in verbatim form. Results: A total of 263 respondents were engaged in the quantitative study. The study utilized a questionnaire and a key informant interview guide. Before processing quantitative data, data was cleaned, coded and keyed into MS Excel database computer and analyzed using SPSS version 21. Descriptive statistics were used to describe measures of central tendency and dispersion. Findings were presented using frequency distributions and summary tables. Associations between predictor and outcome variables were run through Correlational statistics. Of the 263 respondents, 193 (72.6%) were optimistic that HMIS had brought about better up-dating and expertise in healthcare service delivery and 40(15%) were neutral while, 33(12.4%) were pessimistic about the concept. A weak positive correlation (r = 0.3345, p =0.03) between self-confidence in productivity and HMIS implementation was observed. Conclusion:The KNH management needs to ensure that there is system thinking, where each staff is not only motivated but also feels part and parcel of a robust and cohesive HIMS process","PeriodicalId":504355,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Of Health & Medical Research","volume":"38 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Of Health & Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58806/ijhmr.2024.v3i05n04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The project aimed to call to mind the exploration of health management and information systems among healthcare workers at Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya. Design setting: The investigation deployed a cross-sectional study. Subjects or participants: A sample total of 263 respondents was calculated using the Krecie and Morgan formula for the quantitative study. A strict inclusion criterion was followed to select the respondents from all trained health personnel in Kenyatta National Hospital. The study utilized an interview schedule. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 while qualitative data was analyzed on themes developed. Data presentation was in the form of quantitative statistics such as frequency distribution, percentages and tables. Qualitative results were presented in verbatim form. Results: A total of 263 respondents were engaged in the quantitative study. The study utilized a questionnaire and a key informant interview guide. Before processing quantitative data, data was cleaned, coded and keyed into MS Excel database computer and analyzed using SPSS version 21. Descriptive statistics were used to describe measures of central tendency and dispersion. Findings were presented using frequency distributions and summary tables. Associations between predictor and outcome variables were run through Correlational statistics. Of the 263 respondents, 193 (72.6%) were optimistic that HMIS had brought about better up-dating and expertise in healthcare service delivery and 40(15%) were neutral while, 33(12.4%) were pessimistic about the concept. A weak positive correlation (r = 0.3345, p =0.03) between self-confidence in productivity and HMIS implementation was observed. Conclusion:The KNH management needs to ensure that there is system thinking, where each staff is not only motivated but also feels part and parcel of a robust and cohesive HIMS process
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索肯雅塔国立医院医护人员的医疗信息和管理系统趋势
目的:该项目旨在唤起肯尼亚肯雅塔国立医院医护人员对卫生管理和信息系统的探索。设计环境:调查采用横断面研究。研究对象或参与者:采用 Krecie 和 Morgan 公式计算出定量研究的受访者样本总数为 263 人。研究遵循严格的纳入标准,从肯雅塔国立医院所有受过培训的医务人员中挑选受访者。研究采用了访谈表。数据使用 SPSS 21 版进行分析,定性数据则根据拟定的主题进行分析。数据以频率分布、百分比和表格等定量统计形式呈现。定性结果以逐字记录的形式呈现。结果共有 263 名受访者参与了定量研究。研究使用了调查问卷和关键信息提供者访谈指南。在处理定量数据之前,对数据进行了清理、编码,并将其输入 MS Excel 数据库计算机,然后使用 SPSS 21 版进行分析。描述性统计用于描述中心倾向和分散程度。研究结果采用频率分布和汇总表的形式呈现。预测变量和结果变量之间的关联则通过相关统计进行分析。在 263 名受访者中,193 人(72.6%)对 HMIS 带来了更好的医疗保健服务更新和专业知识持乐观态度,40 人(15%)持中立态度,33 人(12.4%)持悲观态度。据观察,生产力自信心与 HMIS 实施之间存在微弱的正相关(r = 0.3345,p =0.03)。结论:KNH 管理层需要确保有系统思维,每个员工不仅要有积极性,而且要感觉到自己是强大而有凝聚力的 HIMS 进程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Active Ingredients and Antidiabetic Effects of Zingiber Officinale: A Review Article Inflammatory Response and Pathophysiology of IL-6 Overproduction: A Review Article The Active Ingredients and Therapeutic Effects of Cinnamon: A Review Article The Relationship Between Dysmenorrhea Pain and Learning Activities in Nursing Students Epidemiology and Classification of Cystic Benign Orbital Tumors: A Review Article
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1