Point-of-Care Tests for COVID-19 and Influenza in Canada

Cadth
{"title":"Point-of-Care Tests for COVID-19 and Influenza in Canada","authors":"Cadth","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2024.894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What Is the Issue? \n \nHealth care providers rely on laboratory tests to differentiate between respiratory illnesses that manifest in similar symptoms, such as COVID-19 and influenza. However, samples may travel to centralized laboratories to process, delaying test results and treatment. \nPoint-of-care tests (POCTs) allow for diagnosis at the site of care but at the expense of diagnostic performance. Several commercial POCTs, specifically for COVID-19, have become increasingly available in Canada since the start of the pandemic. Decision-makers will need to consider which commercial POCT can meet their jurisdiction’s testing needs. \n \nPOCTs in Canada and their Potential Impact \n \nSome POCTs, called “Multiplex tests,” can detect and differentiate between certain illnesses using a single sample. Some studies suggest that using POCTs for respiratory illness in hospitals and emergency departments can expedite diagnosis, improve patient flow, reduce admissions, and shorten the length of stay. \nCommercial POCTs vary in diagnostic performance, complexity, and costs. There are at least 37 authorized POCTs for COVID-19, influenza, or both in Canada. All devices accept a nasal, nasopharyngeal sample, or both sample types for testing. Some tests require a reader or analyzer to use test kits for diagnosis. \nPOCTs can provide results in 1 hour or less. However, laboratory testing (i.e., nucleic acid amplification tests) remains the standard of care to diagnose COVID-19 and influenza, given their better diagnostic performance compared to POCTs. \n \nWhat Else Do We Need to Know? \n \nConfirmatory laboratory tests can reaffirm the diagnosis from POCTs. However, budget impact analyses and clinical studies on authorized tests in Canada do not consider how confirmatory lab tests impact findings on POCT use. Future studies should investigate the cost-effectiveness of POCTs with confirmatory testing, as well as the impact of incorrect diagnosis from POCT on patient outcomes. \nRural and remote communities may benefit from POCTs for respiratory illness, given their distance to centralized laboratories. \n","PeriodicalId":505661,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"66 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What Is the Issue? Health care providers rely on laboratory tests to differentiate between respiratory illnesses that manifest in similar symptoms, such as COVID-19 and influenza. However, samples may travel to centralized laboratories to process, delaying test results and treatment. Point-of-care tests (POCTs) allow for diagnosis at the site of care but at the expense of diagnostic performance. Several commercial POCTs, specifically for COVID-19, have become increasingly available in Canada since the start of the pandemic. Decision-makers will need to consider which commercial POCT can meet their jurisdiction’s testing needs. POCTs in Canada and their Potential Impact Some POCTs, called “Multiplex tests,” can detect and differentiate between certain illnesses using a single sample. Some studies suggest that using POCTs for respiratory illness in hospitals and emergency departments can expedite diagnosis, improve patient flow, reduce admissions, and shorten the length of stay. Commercial POCTs vary in diagnostic performance, complexity, and costs. There are at least 37 authorized POCTs for COVID-19, influenza, or both in Canada. All devices accept a nasal, nasopharyngeal sample, or both sample types for testing. Some tests require a reader or analyzer to use test kits for diagnosis. POCTs can provide results in 1 hour or less. However, laboratory testing (i.e., nucleic acid amplification tests) remains the standard of care to diagnose COVID-19 and influenza, given their better diagnostic performance compared to POCTs. What Else Do We Need to Know? Confirmatory laboratory tests can reaffirm the diagnosis from POCTs. However, budget impact analyses and clinical studies on authorized tests in Canada do not consider how confirmatory lab tests impact findings on POCT use. Future studies should investigate the cost-effectiveness of POCTs with confirmatory testing, as well as the impact of incorrect diagnosis from POCT on patient outcomes. Rural and remote communities may benefit from POCTs for respiratory illness, given their distance to centralized laboratories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大的 COVID-19 和流感护理点检验
问题出在哪里? 医疗服务提供者依靠实验室检测来区分症状相似的呼吸道疾病,如 COVID-19 和流感。然而,样本可能需要送往集中实验室进行处理,从而延误了检测结果和治疗。床旁检测(POCT)可在就医地点进行诊断,但会影响诊断效果。自大流行开始以来,加拿大已有越来越多的商业 POCT(专门针对 COVID-19)可用。决策者需要考虑哪种商用 POCT 能满足其辖区的检测需求。 加拿大的 POCT 及其潜在影响 有些 POCT 被称为 "多重检测",只需一份样本就能检测和区分某些疾病。一些研究表明,在医院和急诊科使用 POCT 检测呼吸道疾病可以加快诊断、改善病人流动、减少入院人数并缩短住院时间。商用 POCT 的诊断性能、复杂程度和成本各不相同。在加拿大,至少有 37 种经授权的 POCT 可检测 COVID-19、流感或两者。所有设备都接受鼻腔、鼻咽部样本或两种样本进行检测。有些检测需要读取器或分析仪,以便使用检测试剂盒进行诊断。POCT 可在 1 小时或更短时间内提供结果。然而,实验室检测(即核酸扩增检测)仍是诊断 COVID-19 和流感的标准方法,因为与 POCT 相比,实验室检测具有更好的诊断性能。 我们还需要了解什么? 实验室确证检验可以再次确认 POCT 的诊断结果。然而,加拿大关于授权检验的预算影响分析和临床研究并未考虑实验室确证检验如何影响 POCT 的使用结果。未来的研究应调查带有确证检验的 POCT 的成本效益,以及 POCT 的错误诊断对患者预后的影响。考虑到农村和偏远社区距离集中实验室较远,呼吸道疾病的 POCT 可能会使这些社区受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Re-Treatment With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors CRISPR Technologies for In Vivo and Ex Vivo Gene Editing Review of Guidelines on Second-Line Therapy for Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A 2024 Update Trends in Public Drug Plan Expenditures for Patients With Crohn Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Initiating Targeted Immune Modulator Therapy National and International Policies on the Use of Biosimilars: An Environmental Scan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1