The learning effects of Korean writing through generative AI ChatGPT for Chinese learners

Yaqiong Yu, HoonSik Yoo
{"title":"The learning effects of Korean writing through generative AI ChatGPT for Chinese learners","authors":"Yaqiong Yu, HoonSik Yoo","doi":"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The purpose of this study is to investigate the learning effects of the two methods of learning Korean writing by Chinese advanced-level learners of Korean writing using general Korean writing and generative AI ChatGPT. \nMethods This study was conducted on 20 Chinese advanced-level learners of Korean and was divided into three stages: planning, writing, and evaluating Korean writing activities using general Korean writing and generative AI ChatGPT. To investigate the learning effects of writing, we examined the writing learning effect after the writing activities and analyzed the differences using the Mann-Whitney U test. For Korean writing using ChatGPT, the learning differences in each stage of planning, writing, and evaluation were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test. \nResults The results of analyzing the learning effects of the two Korean writing methods and the three stages of Korean writing using the ChatGPT did not show any statistically significant differences. However, the interviews showed that most of the learners positively evaluated the learning content, learning flow, self-anxiety, learning efficacy, and learning satisfaction with Korean writing using ChatGPT, and expressed high intentions to use ChatGPT to learn Korean writing in the future. In addition, although the learners responded positively to using ChatGPT in the planning and writing stages, it seemed that it could not replace the teacher’s role because it aimed for more specific points and corrections in the evaluation stage. \nConclusions This study suggests that learners can learn to write most effectively by actively utilizing AI ChatGPT in the planning and writing stages of writing and receiving guidance from a teacher in the evaluation stage.","PeriodicalId":509731,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study is to investigate the learning effects of the two methods of learning Korean writing by Chinese advanced-level learners of Korean writing using general Korean writing and generative AI ChatGPT. Methods This study was conducted on 20 Chinese advanced-level learners of Korean and was divided into three stages: planning, writing, and evaluating Korean writing activities using general Korean writing and generative AI ChatGPT. To investigate the learning effects of writing, we examined the writing learning effect after the writing activities and analyzed the differences using the Mann-Whitney U test. For Korean writing using ChatGPT, the learning differences in each stage of planning, writing, and evaluation were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results The results of analyzing the learning effects of the two Korean writing methods and the three stages of Korean writing using the ChatGPT did not show any statistically significant differences. However, the interviews showed that most of the learners positively evaluated the learning content, learning flow, self-anxiety, learning efficacy, and learning satisfaction with Korean writing using ChatGPT, and expressed high intentions to use ChatGPT to learn Korean writing in the future. In addition, although the learners responded positively to using ChatGPT in the planning and writing stages, it seemed that it could not replace the teacher’s role because it aimed for more specific points and corrections in the evaluation stage. Conclusions This study suggests that learners can learn to write most effectively by actively utilizing AI ChatGPT in the planning and writing stages of writing and receiving guidance from a teacher in the evaluation stage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生成式人工智能 ChatGPT 对中国学习者韩语写作的学习效果
目的 本研究旨在探讨中国高级韩国语学习者使用一般韩国语写作和生成式人工智能 ChatGPT 两种方法学习韩国语写作的学习效果。方法 本研究以 20 名中国韩语高级水平学习者为对象,分为计划、写作和评价三个阶段,分别使用一般韩语写作和生成式人工智能 ChatGPT 进行韩语写作活动。为了研究写作的学习效果,我们考察了写作活动后的写作学习效果,并用曼-惠特尼U检验分析了差异。对于使用 ChatGPT 的韩语写作,我们使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验分析了计划、写作和评价各阶段的学习差异。结果 对两种韩语写作方法和使用 ChatGPT 的韩语写作三个阶段的学习效果进行分析的结果显示,在统计学上没有任何显著差异。然而,访谈结果显示,大多数学习者对使用 ChatGPT 进行韩语写作的学习内容、学习流程、自我焦虑、学习效率和学习满意度给予了积极评价,并表示今后使用 ChatGPT 学习韩语写作的意愿很高。此外,虽然学习者对在计划和写作阶段使用 ChatGPT 反应积极,但它似乎不能取代教师的作用,因为它的目标是在评价阶段提出更具体的要点和更正。结论 本研究表明,学习者可以在写作的计划和写作阶段积极使用人工智能 ChatGPT,并在评估阶段接受教师的指导,从而最有效地学习写作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysing the Perception of Pre-service Teachers on the Infringement of Teachers Rights The Impact of Resilience and Traumatic Stress Coping on Burnout among Firefighters Research on children's aesthetic experiences in outdoor play and teachers' play support Climate change literacy and perception on climate change education according to early childhood teacher’s background variables The Meaning of Ritornello Variations in the Expression of Young Children’s Imagination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1