Emotions in engineering education: A configurative meta‐synthesis systematic review

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Engineering Education Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1002/jee.20600
Johanna Lönngren, Alberto Bellocchi, Maria Berge, Pia Bøgelund, Inês Direito, James L. Huff, Khairiyah Mohd‐Yusof, H. Murzi, Nor Farahwahidah Abdul Rahman, Roland Tormey
{"title":"Emotions in engineering education: A configurative meta‐synthesis systematic review","authors":"Johanna Lönngren, Alberto Bellocchi, Maria Berge, Pia Bøgelund, Inês Direito, James L. Huff, Khairiyah Mohd‐Yusof, H. Murzi, Nor Farahwahidah Abdul Rahman, Roland Tormey","doi":"10.1002/jee.20600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of emotions in engineering education (EEE) has increased in recent years, but this emerging, multidisciplinary body of research is dispersed and not well consolidated. This paper reports on the first systematic review of EEE research and scholarship.The review aimed to critically assess how researchers and scholars in engineering education have conceptualized emotions and how those conceptualizations have been used to frame and conduct EEE research and scholarship.The systematic review followed the procedures of a configurative meta‐synthesis, mapping emotion theories and concepts, research purposes and methods, and citation patterns in the EEE literature. The review proceeded through five stages: (i) scoping and database searching; (ii) abstract screening, full text sifting, and full text review; (iii) pearling; (iv) scoping review, and (v) in‐depth analysis for the meta‐synthesis review. Two hundred and thirteen publications were included in the final analysis.The results show that the EEE literature has not extensively engaged with the wide range of conceptualizations of emotion available in the educational, psychological, and sociological literature. Further, the focus on emotion often seems to have been unintentional and of secondary importance in studies whose primary goals were to study other phenomena.More research adopting intentional, theorized approaches to emotions will be crucial in further developing the field. To do justice to complex emotional phenomena in teaching and learning, future EEE research will also need to engage a broader range of conceptualizations of emotion and research methods, drawing on diverse disciplinary traditions.","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20600","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of emotions in engineering education (EEE) has increased in recent years, but this emerging, multidisciplinary body of research is dispersed and not well consolidated. This paper reports on the first systematic review of EEE research and scholarship.The review aimed to critically assess how researchers and scholars in engineering education have conceptualized emotions and how those conceptualizations have been used to frame and conduct EEE research and scholarship.The systematic review followed the procedures of a configurative meta‐synthesis, mapping emotion theories and concepts, research purposes and methods, and citation patterns in the EEE literature. The review proceeded through five stages: (i) scoping and database searching; (ii) abstract screening, full text sifting, and full text review; (iii) pearling; (iv) scoping review, and (v) in‐depth analysis for the meta‐synthesis review. Two hundred and thirteen publications were included in the final analysis.The results show that the EEE literature has not extensively engaged with the wide range of conceptualizations of emotion available in the educational, psychological, and sociological literature. Further, the focus on emotion often seems to have been unintentional and of secondary importance in studies whose primary goals were to study other phenomena.More research adopting intentional, theorized approaches to emotions will be crucial in further developing the field. To do justice to complex emotional phenomena in teaching and learning, future EEE research will also need to engage a broader range of conceptualizations of emotion and research methods, drawing on diverse disciplinary traditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程学教育中的情感:配置元综合系统综述
近年来,对工程教育(EEE)中情感的研究日益增多,但这一新兴的、多学科的研究体 系较为分散,没有得到很好的整合。本文报告了对工程教育研究和学术研究的首次系统性综述。综述旨在批判性地评估工程教育研究人员和学者是如何将情感概念化的,以及这些概念化是如何被用来构建和开展工程教育研究和学术研究的。系统性综述遵循了配置元综合的程序,映射了工程教育文献中的情感理论和概念、研究目的和方法以及引用模式。综述分为五个阶段:(i) 范围界定和数据库检索;(ii) 摘要筛选、全文筛选和全文综述;(iii) 珍珠筛选;(iv) 范围界定综述;(v) 元综合综述的深入分析。结果表明,情感教育与培训文献并未广泛涉及教育学、心理学和社会学文献中关于情感的各种概念。此外,在以研究其他现象为主要目标的研究中,对情感的关注似乎往往是无意的,而且是次要的。为了公正地对待教学中复杂的情感现象,未来的情感教育研究还需要借鉴不同的学科传统,采用更广泛的情感概念和研究方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Education
Journal of Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) serves to cultivate, disseminate, and archive scholarly research in engineering education.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Celebrating outstanding publications and reviewers from the 2023 volume Professorial intentions of engineering PhDs from historically excluded groups: The influence of graduate school experiences Through their eyes: Understanding institutional factors that impact the transfer processes of Black engineering students An exploration of psychological safety and conflict in first-year engineering student teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1