A comparative assessment of dento-facial aesthetics among dental, medical, nursing and physiotherapy students in a college of health sciences

O. Oginni, O. Soyele
{"title":"A comparative assessment of dento-facial aesthetics among dental, medical, nursing and physiotherapy students in a college of health sciences","authors":"O. Oginni, O. Soyele","doi":"10.18231/j.jco.2024.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is increased awareness and concerns about dentofacial aesthetics in most population. We sought to determine the self-assessment of dental aesthetics and perceived treatment need among a group of health professions trainees and compare the same with the researcher’s report using the Aesthetic component (AC) of Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). This was a cross-sectional study of undergraduates in our College of Health Sciences. The researcher was calibrated. Subjects supplied their socio-demographic details, responses on perception of their teeth, and smile on a self-administered questionnaire. Additionally, respondents selected and documented a picture that best matches theirs from the AC of the IOTN chart, while the researcher did the same and compared the scores. Data were analyzed using the SPSS version 16.0.: 121 students were studied. 59% were previous dental clinic attendees. The majority (80.2%) usually females rated their smile pleasant. 69.4% expressed satisfaction with the appearance of their teeth. Male and female subjects differed significantly in the ratings of their smile and teeth; with significantly more females rating themselves better than average. Subjects’ scores differ significantly from the researcher’s; most subjects rated their occlusion better especially females (p<0.001), physiotherapy students(p=0.0016), and previous clinic attendees(p=0.02). The odds of correct self-assessment increased by 1.6 with respondents' gender and department.: While dental students are well suited for dento-facial aesthetic assessment, there is a need to introduce aspects of dental aesthetics and orthodontic treatment need appraisal among other oral health subjects to curricula in college of health science.","PeriodicalId":497876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics","volume":"46 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jco.2024.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is increased awareness and concerns about dentofacial aesthetics in most population. We sought to determine the self-assessment of dental aesthetics and perceived treatment need among a group of health professions trainees and compare the same with the researcher’s report using the Aesthetic component (AC) of Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). This was a cross-sectional study of undergraduates in our College of Health Sciences. The researcher was calibrated. Subjects supplied their socio-demographic details, responses on perception of their teeth, and smile on a self-administered questionnaire. Additionally, respondents selected and documented a picture that best matches theirs from the AC of the IOTN chart, while the researcher did the same and compared the scores. Data were analyzed using the SPSS version 16.0.: 121 students were studied. 59% were previous dental clinic attendees. The majority (80.2%) usually females rated their smile pleasant. 69.4% expressed satisfaction with the appearance of their teeth. Male and female subjects differed significantly in the ratings of their smile and teeth; with significantly more females rating themselves better than average. Subjects’ scores differ significantly from the researcher’s; most subjects rated their occlusion better especially females (p<0.001), physiotherapy students(p=0.0016), and previous clinic attendees(p=0.02). The odds of correct self-assessment increased by 1.6 with respondents' gender and department.: While dental students are well suited for dento-facial aesthetic assessment, there is a need to introduce aspects of dental aesthetics and orthodontic treatment need appraisal among other oral health subjects to curricula in college of health science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生科学学院牙科、医学、护理和理疗专业学生牙面美学比较评估
大多数人对牙颌面美学的认识和关注都有所提高。我们试图确定一组卫生专业受训人员对牙齿美学和感知治疗需求的自我评估,并将其与研究人员使用正畸治疗需求指数(IOTN)的美学部分(AC)所作的报告进行比较。这是一项针对本校健康科学学院本科生的横断面研究。研究人员经过校准。受试者在自制的调查问卷上提供了他们的社会人口详情、对自己牙齿的看法以及微笑的回答。此外,受试者还从 IOTN 图表的 AC 中选择了一张与自己最匹配的图片并记录下来,而研究人员也做了同样的工作并比较了得分。数据使用 SPSS 16.0 版进行分析。59%的学生曾在牙科诊所就诊。大多数(80.2%)女性认为自己的笑容令人愉快。69.4%的人对自己的牙齿外观表示满意。男性和女性受试者对自己的微笑和牙齿的评价存在显著差异;女性对自己的评价明显高于平均水平。受试者的评分与研究人员的评分有明显差异;大多数受试者对自己咬合的评价较好,尤其是女性(p<0.001)、物理治疗专业学生(p=0.0016)和以前参加过门诊的受试者(p=0.02)。自我评估正确的几率随受访者的性别和科室而增加 1.6:虽然牙科学生非常适合牙面部美学评估,但仍有必要在健康科学学院的课程中引入牙科美学和正畸治疗需求评估等口腔健康科目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic evaluation of skeletal cephalometric parameters and photograph-Based soft tissue parameters in Malwa Population Comparative evaluation of accuracy and stability of Orthodontic temporary anchorage device with and without the use of Mini-implant placement guiding device (MIG-20) in adults- An in vivo study Composite lateral cephalometric norms– A pooled estimate of 137 Indian studies A survey on the knowledge and perception of orthodontic clear aligner systems among general dentists Beyond the ARCH: Examining mandibular third molar movements in response to premolar and single incisor extractions in orthodontic practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1