Impact of Titer of Toxoplasma Immunoglobulin G on the Diagnosis of Ocular Toxoplasmosis

Sung Hyun Jo, Bo Hyun Park, Han Jo Kwon, Ik Soo Byon, Jong Youn Yi, Sung Who Park
{"title":"Impact of Titer of Toxoplasma Immunoglobulin G on the Diagnosis of Ocular Toxoplasmosis","authors":"Sung Hyun Jo, Bo Hyun Park, Han Jo Kwon, Ik Soo Byon, Jong Youn Yi, Sung Who Park","doi":"10.3341/jkos.2024.65.5.320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the impact of toxoplasma immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers on the diagnosis of active ocular toxoplasmosis.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients tested for toxoplasma IgG at our uveitis clinic. Active ocular toxoplasmosis was clinically diagnosed based on wide-angle fundus photography and disease progression. Patients with IgG titers ≥ 30 IU/mL were classified as seropositive-high titer, those with IgG titers of 1.6-30 IU/mL as seropositive-low titer, and the remaining patients as seronegative. We compared the proportion of active ocular toxoplasmosis among these groups. Additionally, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of each titer and attempted to determine an ideal reference titer for toxoplasma IgG in diagnosing active ocular toxoplasmosis.Results: Out of 824 patients, 86 (10.4%), 88 (10.7%), and 650 (78.9%) were categorized as seropositive-high titer, seropositivelow titer, and seronegative, respectively. Among these patients, 34 in the seropositive-high titer group and 2 in the seropositive- low titer group were clinically diagnosed with active ocular toxoplasmosis. The false-positive rate was significantly different between the groups, being 60.5% in the seropositive-high titer group and 97.7% in the seropositive-low titer group (p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that 37.70 IU/mL could be an ideal reference titer for diagnosing ocular toxoplasmosis.Conclusions: The false-positive rate was notably lower (60.5%) in patients with IgG titers ≥ 30 IU/mL compared to those with titers of 1.6-30 IU/mL (97.7%). Therefore, not only the presence of IgG but also the level of titer appears to be important in diagnosing ocular toxoplasmosis.","PeriodicalId":504314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2024.65.5.320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the impact of toxoplasma immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers on the diagnosis of active ocular toxoplasmosis.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients tested for toxoplasma IgG at our uveitis clinic. Active ocular toxoplasmosis was clinically diagnosed based on wide-angle fundus photography and disease progression. Patients with IgG titers ≥ 30 IU/mL were classified as seropositive-high titer, those with IgG titers of 1.6-30 IU/mL as seropositive-low titer, and the remaining patients as seronegative. We compared the proportion of active ocular toxoplasmosis among these groups. Additionally, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of each titer and attempted to determine an ideal reference titer for toxoplasma IgG in diagnosing active ocular toxoplasmosis.Results: Out of 824 patients, 86 (10.4%), 88 (10.7%), and 650 (78.9%) were categorized as seropositive-high titer, seropositivelow titer, and seronegative, respectively. Among these patients, 34 in the seropositive-high titer group and 2 in the seropositive- low titer group were clinically diagnosed with active ocular toxoplasmosis. The false-positive rate was significantly different between the groups, being 60.5% in the seropositive-high titer group and 97.7% in the seropositive-low titer group (p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that 37.70 IU/mL could be an ideal reference titer for diagnosing ocular toxoplasmosis.Conclusions: The false-positive rate was notably lower (60.5%) in patients with IgG titers ≥ 30 IU/mL compared to those with titers of 1.6-30 IU/mL (97.7%). Therefore, not only the presence of IgG but also the level of titer appears to be important in diagnosing ocular toxoplasmosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弓形虫免疫球蛋白 G 效价对眼部弓形虫病诊断的影响
目的:评估弓形虫免疫球蛋白 G (IgG) 滴度对活动性眼弓形虫病诊断的影响:我们回顾性分析了在葡萄膜炎诊所接受弓形虫 IgG 检测的患者的病历。活动性眼弓形虫病是根据广角眼底摄影和疾病进展情况进行临床诊断的。IgG 滴度≥ 30 IU/mL 的患者被归类为血清阳性-高滴度,IgG 滴度为 1.6-30 IU/mL 的患者被归类为血清阳性-低滴度,其余患者被归类为血清阴性。我们比较了这些组别中活动性眼弓形虫病的比例。此外,我们还评估了每种滴度的敏感性和特异性,并试图确定诊断活动性眼弓形虫病的理想弓形虫 IgG 参考滴度:在824名患者中,分别有86人(10.4%)、88人(10.7%)和650人(78.9%)血清阳性-高滴度、血清阳性-低滴度和血清阴性。在这些患者中,血清阳性-高滴度组有 34 人,血清阳性-低滴度组有 2 人被临床诊断为活动性眼弓形虫病。两组的假阳性率有显著差异,血清阳性-高滴度组为 60.5%,血清阳性-低滴度组为 97.7%(P < 0.001)。接受者操作特征曲线显示,37.70 IU/mL可作为诊断眼弓形虫病的理想参考滴度:IgG滴度≥30 IU/mL的患者的假阳性率(60.5%)明显低于滴度为1.6-30 IU/mL的患者(97.7%)。因此,在诊断眼弓形虫病时,不仅要看是否存在 IgG,滴度的高低也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Initial Factors Associated with Resistance to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Three Familial Cases of Stickler Syndrome: A Case Report One-year Clinical Outcome of Topical Bromfenac in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy A Case of Atypical Cytomegalovirus Corneal Endotheliitis after Intravitreal Triamcinolone Injection Correction of Internal Astigmatism Using Toric Scleral Contact Lens after Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1