A comparison study of artificial intelligence performance against physicians in benign–malignant classification of pulmonary nodules

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Oncologie Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1515/oncologie-2023-0319
Weiguo Hu, Jie Zhang, Dingyi Zhou, Shu Xia, Xingxiang Pu, Jianzhong Cao, Mingzhu Zou, Zhangfan Mao, Qibin Song, Xiaodong Zhang
{"title":"A comparison study of artificial intelligence performance against physicians in benign–malignant classification of pulmonary nodules","authors":"Weiguo Hu, Jie Zhang, Dingyi Zhou, Shu Xia, Xingxiang Pu, Jianzhong Cao, Mingzhu Zou, Zhangfan Mao, Qibin Song, Xiaodong Zhang","doi":"10.1515/oncologie-2023-0319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To compare and evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) against physicians in classifying benign and malignant pulmonary nodules from computerized tomography (CT) images.\n \n \n \n A total of 506 CT images with pulmonary nodules were retrospectively collected. The AI was trained using in-house software. For comparing the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence and different groups of physicians in pulmonary nodules, statistical methods of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed. The nodules in CT images were analyzed in a case-by-case manner.\n \n \n \n The diagnostic accuracy of AI surpassed that of all groups of physicians, exhibiting an AUC of 0.88 alongside a sensitivity of 0.80, specificity of 0.84, and accuracy of 0.83. The area under the curve (AUC) of seven groups of physicians varies between 0.63 and 0.84. The sensitivity of the physicians within these groups varies between 0.4 and 0.76. The specificity of different groups ranges from 0.8 to 0.85. Furthermore, the accuracy of the seven groups ranges from 0.7 to 0.82. The professional insights for enhancing deep learning models were obtained through an examination conducted on a per-case basis.\n \n \n \n AI demonstrated great potential in the benign–malignant classification of pulmonary nodules with higher accuracy. More accurate information will be provided by AI when making clinical decisions.\n","PeriodicalId":54687,"journal":{"name":"Oncologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/oncologie-2023-0319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare and evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) against physicians in classifying benign and malignant pulmonary nodules from computerized tomography (CT) images. A total of 506 CT images with pulmonary nodules were retrospectively collected. The AI was trained using in-house software. For comparing the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence and different groups of physicians in pulmonary nodules, statistical methods of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed. The nodules in CT images were analyzed in a case-by-case manner. The diagnostic accuracy of AI surpassed that of all groups of physicians, exhibiting an AUC of 0.88 alongside a sensitivity of 0.80, specificity of 0.84, and accuracy of 0.83. The area under the curve (AUC) of seven groups of physicians varies between 0.63 and 0.84. The sensitivity of the physicians within these groups varies between 0.4 and 0.76. The specificity of different groups ranges from 0.8 to 0.85. Furthermore, the accuracy of the seven groups ranges from 0.7 to 0.82. The professional insights for enhancing deep learning models were obtained through an examination conducted on a per-case basis. AI demonstrated great potential in the benign–malignant classification of pulmonary nodules with higher accuracy. More accurate information will be provided by AI when making clinical decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能与医生在肺结节良恶性分类方面的性能比较研究
比较和评估人工智能(AI)与医生在根据计算机断层扫描(CT)图像对肺部结节进行良性和恶性分类方面的性能。 回顾性收集了 506 张带有肺结节的 CT 图像。人工智能使用内部软件进行训练。为了比较人工智能和不同组别医生对肺结节的诊断性能,分析了接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)的统计方法。对 CT 图像中的结节进行了逐个分析。 人工智能的诊断准确性超过了所有医生组,其 AUC 为 0.88,敏感性为 0.80,特异性为 0.84,准确性为 0.83。七组医生的曲线下面积(AUC)介于 0.63 和 0.84 之间。这些组别中医生的灵敏度介于 0.4 和 0.76 之间。不同组别的特异性介于 0.8 和 0.85 之间。此外,七个组别的准确性介于 0.7 和 0.82 之间。通过对每个病例进行检查,获得了增强深度学习模型的专业见解。 人工智能在肺结节的良恶性分类方面表现出巨大潜力,准确率更高。人工智能将为临床决策提供更准确的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologie
Oncologie 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Oncologie is aimed to the publication of high quality original research articles, review papers, case report, etc. with an active interest in vivo or vitro study of cancer biology. Study relating to the pathology, diagnosis, and advanced treatment of all types of cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest. The journal has English and French bilingual publication.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the anti-lung cancer mechanism of Ganoderma lucidum and its relationship with the level of immune cell infiltration based on network pharmacology and molecular docking Exploring the anti-lung cancer mechanism of Ganoderma lucidum and its relationship with the level of immune cell infiltration based on network pharmacology and molecular docking Unveiling the unexplored: shedding light on a novel aspect of colorectal carcinoma Cisplatin-induced pyroptosis: a double-edged sword in cancer treatment Radiotherapy directed to inferior vena cava tumor thrombus among patients with renal cell carcinoma: an illustrative case and review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1