A finite element method study to compare enmasse retraction of maxillary anteriors using mini implant and conventional anchorage method

Mohit Makkar, Astitav Mittal, Ashish Gupta, Nazia Beg
{"title":"A finite element method study to compare enmasse retraction of maxillary anteriors using mini implant and conventional anchorage method","authors":"Mohit Makkar, Astitav Mittal, Ashish Gupta, Nazia Beg","doi":"10.18231/j.jco.2024.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased upper lip procumbency is associated with protrusive maxillary dentition in Angle’s class I malocclusion, creating unaesthetic facial profile, leading to the need of orthodontic treatment where Enmasse retraction will require maximum anchorage.The present study was conducted to compare Enmasse retraction of maxillary anteriors using mini implant and conventional anchorage in Angle’s Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion. A numeric approach was adopted. Finite element method was used to determine the stress and displacement of various components at a given time by dividing it into two groups namely, Implant arrangement and T- loop arrangement for enmasse retraction. Significant differences were observed when the stress values were compared between Implant arrangement and T-loop arrangement. In Implant arrangement highest stress values were seen around the lateral incisors and in T loop arrangement stresses were found around canine and premolar. Comparison of displacement in both arrangements gave results of greater displacement in anterior and posterior segments in T-loop arrangement. Mini implants were considered more effective for enmasse retraction but in this study, it was found that although the rate of retraction/ displacement was more in T-loop arrangement but Mini implants in implant arrangement served as an absolute anchorage.","PeriodicalId":497876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics","volume":"125 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jco.2024.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increased upper lip procumbency is associated with protrusive maxillary dentition in Angle’s class I malocclusion, creating unaesthetic facial profile, leading to the need of orthodontic treatment where Enmasse retraction will require maximum anchorage.The present study was conducted to compare Enmasse retraction of maxillary anteriors using mini implant and conventional anchorage in Angle’s Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion. A numeric approach was adopted. Finite element method was used to determine the stress and displacement of various components at a given time by dividing it into two groups namely, Implant arrangement and T- loop arrangement for enmasse retraction. Significant differences were observed when the stress values were compared between Implant arrangement and T-loop arrangement. In Implant arrangement highest stress values were seen around the lateral incisors and in T loop arrangement stresses were found around canine and premolar. Comparison of displacement in both arrangements gave results of greater displacement in anterior and posterior segments in T-loop arrangement. Mini implants were considered more effective for enmasse retraction but in this study, it was found that although the rate of retraction/ displacement was more in T-loop arrangement but Mini implants in implant arrangement served as an absolute anchorage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用微型种植体和传统锚固法比较上颌前牙整体后缩的有限元法研究
上唇前突的增加与Angle's I类错牙合畸形的上颌牙齿前突有关,会造成不美观的面部轮廓,因此需要进行正畸治疗,在正畸治疗中,Enmasse牵引需要最大程度的锚定。本研究对Angle's I类错牙合畸形双颌前突患者使用迷你种植体和传统锚定进行上颌前牙Enmasse牵引进行了比较。研究采用了数值方法。采用有限元法确定各部件在给定时间内的应力和位移,并将其分为两组,即种植体排列和T环排列的恒定牵引。当比较植入式布置和 T 型环布置的应力值时,发现两者之间存在显著差异。在种植体排列中,侧切牙周围的应力值最大,而在 T 环排列中,犬齿和前臼齿周围的应力最大。对两种排列方式的位移进行比较的结果是,T 型环排列方式的前后段位移更大。迷你种植体被认为对全口牵引更有效,但在这项研究中发现,虽然 T 环排列的牵引/位移率更高,但迷你种植体在种植排列中起到了绝对固定的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic evaluation of skeletal cephalometric parameters and photograph-Based soft tissue parameters in Malwa Population Comparative evaluation of accuracy and stability of Orthodontic temporary anchorage device with and without the use of Mini-implant placement guiding device (MIG-20) in adults- An in vivo study Composite lateral cephalometric norms– A pooled estimate of 137 Indian studies A survey on the knowledge and perception of orthodontic clear aligner systems among general dentists Beyond the ARCH: Examining mandibular third molar movements in response to premolar and single incisor extractions in orthodontic practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1