Mohit Makkar, Astitav Mittal, Ashish Gupta, Nazia Beg
{"title":"A finite element method study to compare enmasse retraction of maxillary anteriors using mini implant and conventional anchorage method","authors":"Mohit Makkar, Astitav Mittal, Ashish Gupta, Nazia Beg","doi":"10.18231/j.jco.2024.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased upper lip procumbency is associated with protrusive maxillary dentition in Angle’s class I malocclusion, creating unaesthetic facial profile, leading to the need of orthodontic treatment where Enmasse retraction will require maximum anchorage.The present study was conducted to compare Enmasse retraction of maxillary anteriors using mini implant and conventional anchorage in Angle’s Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion. A numeric approach was adopted. Finite element method was used to determine the stress and displacement of various components at a given time by dividing it into two groups namely, Implant arrangement and T- loop arrangement for enmasse retraction. Significant differences were observed when the stress values were compared between Implant arrangement and T-loop arrangement. In Implant arrangement highest stress values were seen around the lateral incisors and in T loop arrangement stresses were found around canine and premolar. Comparison of displacement in both arrangements gave results of greater displacement in anterior and posterior segments in T-loop arrangement. Mini implants were considered more effective for enmasse retraction but in this study, it was found that although the rate of retraction/ displacement was more in T-loop arrangement but Mini implants in implant arrangement served as an absolute anchorage.","PeriodicalId":497876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics","volume":"125 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jco.2024.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Increased upper lip procumbency is associated with protrusive maxillary dentition in Angle’s class I malocclusion, creating unaesthetic facial profile, leading to the need of orthodontic treatment where Enmasse retraction will require maximum anchorage.The present study was conducted to compare Enmasse retraction of maxillary anteriors using mini implant and conventional anchorage in Angle’s Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion. A numeric approach was adopted. Finite element method was used to determine the stress and displacement of various components at a given time by dividing it into two groups namely, Implant arrangement and T- loop arrangement for enmasse retraction. Significant differences were observed when the stress values were compared between Implant arrangement and T-loop arrangement. In Implant arrangement highest stress values were seen around the lateral incisors and in T loop arrangement stresses were found around canine and premolar. Comparison of displacement in both arrangements gave results of greater displacement in anterior and posterior segments in T-loop arrangement. Mini implants were considered more effective for enmasse retraction but in this study, it was found that although the rate of retraction/ displacement was more in T-loop arrangement but Mini implants in implant arrangement served as an absolute anchorage.
上唇前突的增加与Angle's I类错牙合畸形的上颌牙齿前突有关,会造成不美观的面部轮廓,因此需要进行正畸治疗,在正畸治疗中,Enmasse牵引需要最大程度的锚定。本研究对Angle's I类错牙合畸形双颌前突患者使用迷你种植体和传统锚定进行上颌前牙Enmasse牵引进行了比较。研究采用了数值方法。采用有限元法确定各部件在给定时间内的应力和位移,并将其分为两组,即种植体排列和T环排列的恒定牵引。当比较植入式布置和 T 型环布置的应力值时,发现两者之间存在显著差异。在种植体排列中,侧切牙周围的应力值最大,而在 T 环排列中,犬齿和前臼齿周围的应力最大。对两种排列方式的位移进行比较的结果是,T 型环排列方式的前后段位移更大。迷你种植体被认为对全口牵引更有效,但在这项研究中发现,虽然 T 环排列的牵引/位移率更高,但迷你种植体在种植排列中起到了绝对固定的作用。