Factors influencing green bond yield: Evidence from Asia and Latin American countries

Q3 Social Sciences Environmental Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.21511/ee.15(1).2024.09
Abhilash Abhilash, Sandeep S. Shenoy, Dasharathraj K. Shetty
{"title":"Factors influencing green bond yield: Evidence from Asia and Latin American countries","authors":"Abhilash Abhilash, Sandeep S. Shenoy, Dasharathraj K. Shetty","doi":"10.21511/ee.15(1).2024.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite numerous studies in the domain of green bonds, a paucity of literature concentrates on emerging countries’ green bonds. To fill this void, this study aims to examine the factors influencing green bond yield in the Asian and Latin American contexts. The data are compiled from the Bloomberg and Fred databases between 2017 and 2022. The panel regression with the Generalized Least Square method was employed. The results reveal that Asian green bonds provide higher yields with less risk to their investors than Latin American green bonds. The regression results of Asian green bonds show negligible effects of all factors, except coupon rate with a positive effect (β = 0.844), indicating its remarkable influence on green bond yield. However, the findings of Latin American green bonds uncover that coupon (β = 0.780), maturity (β = 0.025), and bond rate (β = 2.472) surpass the green bonds yield due to their positive effects, whereas issue size (β = –1.215) causes a reduction in the green bonds yield with their negative effect. Further, Environmental, Social, and Governance disclosure shows a positive (β = 1.611) effect, indicating better yield for investors due to their potential power to vanish greenwashing in these markets. Moreover, interest rate and GDP exert significant positive (β = 0.141) and negative (β = –0.030) effects on green bond yield, respectively. This observation implies that higher lending rates increase bond yield, whereas GDP-led growth provides lower yield due to better economic prospects and high investor demand for the bonds.\nAcknowledgmentThe authors are grateful to Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, for providing financial assistance in the form of a “JRF Contingency Grant” for this research article.","PeriodicalId":52974,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Economics","volume":"29 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.15(1).2024.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite numerous studies in the domain of green bonds, a paucity of literature concentrates on emerging countries’ green bonds. To fill this void, this study aims to examine the factors influencing green bond yield in the Asian and Latin American contexts. The data are compiled from the Bloomberg and Fred databases between 2017 and 2022. The panel regression with the Generalized Least Square method was employed. The results reveal that Asian green bonds provide higher yields with less risk to their investors than Latin American green bonds. The regression results of Asian green bonds show negligible effects of all factors, except coupon rate with a positive effect (β = 0.844), indicating its remarkable influence on green bond yield. However, the findings of Latin American green bonds uncover that coupon (β = 0.780), maturity (β = 0.025), and bond rate (β = 2.472) surpass the green bonds yield due to their positive effects, whereas issue size (β = –1.215) causes a reduction in the green bonds yield with their negative effect. Further, Environmental, Social, and Governance disclosure shows a positive (β = 1.611) effect, indicating better yield for investors due to their potential power to vanish greenwashing in these markets. Moreover, interest rate and GDP exert significant positive (β = 0.141) and negative (β = –0.030) effects on green bond yield, respectively. This observation implies that higher lending rates increase bond yield, whereas GDP-led growth provides lower yield due to better economic prospects and high investor demand for the bonds. AcknowledgmentThe authors are grateful to Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, for providing financial assistance in the form of a “JRF Contingency Grant” for this research article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响绿色债券收益率的因素:来自亚洲和拉丁美洲国家的证据
尽管绿色债券领域的研究很多,但集中研究新兴国家绿色债券的文献却很少。为填补这一空白,本研究旨在探讨影响亚洲和拉丁美洲绿色债券收益率的因素。数据来自彭博社和 Fred 数据库,时间跨度为 2017 年至 2022 年。采用广义最小二乘法进行面板回归。结果显示,与拉美绿色债券相比,亚洲绿色债券为投资者提供了更高的收益率和更低的风险。亚洲绿色债券的回归结果显示,除票面利率有正向影响(β = 0.844)外,其他因素的影响均可忽略不计,表明票面利率对绿色债券收益率的影响显著。然而,拉美绿色债券的研究结果表明,票面利率(β = 0.780)、期限(β = 0.025)和债券利率(β = 2.472)因其正效应而超过绿色债券收益率,而发行规模(β = -1.215)因其负效应而导致绿色债券收益率下降。此外,环境、社会和治理信息披露显示出正向效应(β = 1.611),表明由于其在这些市场中消除 "洗绿 "的潜在力量,投资者可获得更好的收益。此外,利率和 GDP 分别对绿色债券收益率产生了显著的正效应(β = 0.141)和负效应(β = -0.030)。这一观察结果表明,较高的贷款利率会提高债券收益率,而由 GDP 带动的增长则会降低收益率,这是因为经济前景较好,投资者对债券的需求较高。 鸣谢作者感谢曼尼帕尔高等教育学院(MAHE)以 "JRF 应急补助金 "的形式为本研究文章提供资金援助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Economics
Environmental Economics Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decarbonization in the maritime industry: Factors to create an efficient transition strategy Governmental approaches to food security management: A bibliometric analysis Implementation of eco-control system by Indonesian manufacturing firms: Understanding the mediating role of organizational culture Is corporate social responsibility effective in improving environmental quality? Literature review Evaluating the efficiency of public expenditure in municipal waste collection: A comparative study of Portuguese municipalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1