Profiling employee engagement dimensions and outcomes: a person-centered approach

Punam Singh, Lingam Sreehitha, Vimal Kumar, B. Rajak, Shulagna Sarkar
{"title":"Profiling employee engagement dimensions and outcomes: a person-centered approach","authors":"Punam Singh, Lingam Sreehitha, Vimal Kumar, B. Rajak, Shulagna Sarkar","doi":"10.1108/ijppm-08-2023-0426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeEmployee engagement (EE) continues to be one of the most difficult challenges for organizations today. Numerous factors have been linked to EE, according to studies. However, the necessary human resource management (HRM) strategies and systems for enhancing EE have not yet been developed. It is questionable if all employees inside the company require the same HRM strategies, to boost engagement as one size does not fit all. Therefore, it is necessary to create employee profiles based on factors associated with EE. This study aims to develop employee profiles based on engagement dimensions and outcomes. It seeks to comprehend the relationship between engagement level and factors such as age, years of service and employment grade.Design/methodology/approachUsing latent profile analysis (LPA), we identified five EE profiles (highly engaged, engaged, moderately engaged, disengaged and highly disengaged). These five profiles were characterized by five EE dimensions (Culture Dimensions, Leadership Dimensions, People Process, Business alignment Dimension and Job Dimension) and EE outcomes (Say, Stay and Strive).FindingsThe study revealed that Engaged profiles exhibited low stay outcomes. The highest percentage of disengaged employees fall under 25 years of age with less than 5 years of experience and are at the entry level.Research limitations/implicationsThe study highlights the significance of the people processes dimensions in enhancing engagement. Profiles with low people process dimensions showed high disengagement. Person-centered LPA adds and complements variable-centered approach to develop a better understanding of EE and help organizations devise more personalized strategies. The study would be of interest to both academics and practitioners.Originality/valueThe novelty of this study lies in its attempt to model the employee profiles to comprehend the relationship between engagement levels using LPA.","PeriodicalId":503012,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","volume":"11 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-08-2023-0426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeEmployee engagement (EE) continues to be one of the most difficult challenges for organizations today. Numerous factors have been linked to EE, according to studies. However, the necessary human resource management (HRM) strategies and systems for enhancing EE have not yet been developed. It is questionable if all employees inside the company require the same HRM strategies, to boost engagement as one size does not fit all. Therefore, it is necessary to create employee profiles based on factors associated with EE. This study aims to develop employee profiles based on engagement dimensions and outcomes. It seeks to comprehend the relationship between engagement level and factors such as age, years of service and employment grade.Design/methodology/approachUsing latent profile analysis (LPA), we identified five EE profiles (highly engaged, engaged, moderately engaged, disengaged and highly disengaged). These five profiles were characterized by five EE dimensions (Culture Dimensions, Leadership Dimensions, People Process, Business alignment Dimension and Job Dimension) and EE outcomes (Say, Stay and Strive).FindingsThe study revealed that Engaged profiles exhibited low stay outcomes. The highest percentage of disengaged employees fall under 25 years of age with less than 5 years of experience and are at the entry level.Research limitations/implicationsThe study highlights the significance of the people processes dimensions in enhancing engagement. Profiles with low people process dimensions showed high disengagement. Person-centered LPA adds and complements variable-centered approach to develop a better understanding of EE and help organizations devise more personalized strategies. The study would be of interest to both academics and practitioners.Originality/valueThe novelty of this study lies in its attempt to model the employee profiles to comprehend the relationship between engagement levels using LPA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖析员工敬业度的维度和结果:以人为本的方法
目的员工敬业度(EE)仍然是当今组织面临的最严峻挑战之一。研究表明,许多因素都与员工敬业度有关。然而,提高员工敬业度所需的人力资源管理(HRM)战略和系统尚未开发出来。公司内部的所有员工是否都需要同样的人力资源管理战略来提高参与度,这一点值得商榷,因为 "一刀切 "的做法并不适合所有人。因此,有必要根据与敬业度相关的因素建立员工档案。本研究旨在根据敬业度维度和结果建立员工档案。设计/方法/途径通过潜在特征分析(LPA),我们确定了五种员工敬业度特征(高度敬业、敬业、中度敬业、脱离敬业和高度脱离敬业)。这五种特征由五个 EE 维度(文化维度、领导力维度、人员流程、业务调整维度和工作维度)和 EE 结果(说、留和努力)来描述。研究的局限性/影响研究强调了人员流程维度在提高敬业度方面的重要性。人员流程维度较低的员工离职率较高。以人为中心的 LPA 是对以变量为中心的方法的补充和完善,有助于更好地了解 EE,帮助组织制定更加个性化的策略。这项研究对学术界和从业人员都很有意义。原创性/价值这项研究的新颖之处在于它尝试使用 LPA 建立员工档案模型,以理解敬业度之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic policy uncertainty and firm’s profitability: the role of logistics infrastructure Exploring the effect of enterprise risk management for ESG risks towards green growth Advances in hub location problems: a literature review and research agenda Measuring the production performance indicators for metal-mechanic industry: an LDA modeling approach A multilevel model for organizational productivity management: an interpretive structural modeling approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1