Measurement Invariance of the Fear of Happiness Scale in Adults Samples From Six Countries

Mohsen Joshanloo, Murat Yıldırım, Edyta Janus, C. Frosch, Isabel Silva, Glória Jólluskin
{"title":"Measurement Invariance of the Fear of Happiness Scale in Adults Samples From Six Countries","authors":"Mohsen Joshanloo, Murat Yıldırım, Edyta Janus, C. Frosch, Isabel Silva, Glória Jólluskin","doi":"10.1027/1015-5759/a000834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Previous cross-cultural research on the measurement invariance of the fear of happiness scale has largely been limited to small student samples, making it difficult to generalize findings to more diverse populations. This study examined the measurement invariance of the fear of happiness scale in adult samples from South Korea, Canada, Turkey, Poland, Portugal, and the United States. Sample sizes ranged from 256 to 1,177 participants per country (total N = 3,930). The single-factor model of fear of happiness fitted the data well, and the reliabilities were acceptable in all countries. After adjustment for age, partial scalar invariance was supported, with Items 3 and 5 being non-invariant. Latent mean analysis revealed significant country differences, with Turkey having the highest fear of happiness score and Portugal having the lowest. These findings suggest that the scale can be used to measure fear of happiness in diverse adult samples. However, Items 3 and 5 may not be interpreted consistently across cultures. Therefore, caution should be used when comparing observed means across countries. For meaningful cross-cultural comparisons, researchers should compare latent means after considering and addressing any potential non-invariance issues.","PeriodicalId":508777,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"45 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Previous cross-cultural research on the measurement invariance of the fear of happiness scale has largely been limited to small student samples, making it difficult to generalize findings to more diverse populations. This study examined the measurement invariance of the fear of happiness scale in adult samples from South Korea, Canada, Turkey, Poland, Portugal, and the United States. Sample sizes ranged from 256 to 1,177 participants per country (total N = 3,930). The single-factor model of fear of happiness fitted the data well, and the reliabilities were acceptable in all countries. After adjustment for age, partial scalar invariance was supported, with Items 3 and 5 being non-invariant. Latent mean analysis revealed significant country differences, with Turkey having the highest fear of happiness score and Portugal having the lowest. These findings suggest that the scale can be used to measure fear of happiness in diverse adult samples. However, Items 3 and 5 may not be interpreted consistently across cultures. Therefore, caution should be used when comparing observed means across countries. For meaningful cross-cultural comparisons, researchers should compare latent means after considering and addressing any potential non-invariance issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幸福恐惧量表在六个国家成人样本中的测量不变性
摘要:以往有关 "幸福恐惧量表 "测量不变性的跨文化研究大多局限于小规模的学生样本,因此很难将研究结果推广到更多样化的人群中。本研究在韩国、加拿大、土耳其、波兰、葡萄牙和美国的成人样本中检验了幸福恐惧量表的测量不变性。每个国家的样本量从 256 到 1,177 人不等(总人数 = 3,930 人)。幸福恐惧的单因素模型很好地拟合了数据,在所有国家的信度都是可以接受的。在对年龄进行调整后,部分标度不变性得到了支持,但项目 3 和项目 5 不不变。潜均值分析显示出明显的国家差异,土耳其的 "幸福恐惧 "得分最高,葡萄牙最低。这些结果表明,该量表可用于测量不同成人样本的幸福恐惧感。然而,项目 3 和 5 在不同文化中的解释可能并不一致。因此,在比较不同国家的观察平均值时应谨慎。为了进行有意义的跨文化比较,研究人员应在考虑并解决任何潜在的非方差问题后,再比较潜在平均值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness Briefly Correction to Rost et al. (2024) Adapting the BFI-2 Around the World – Coordinated Translation and Validation in Five Languages and Cultural Contexts Challenges for Psychological Assessment The Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Academic Grit Scale (AGS) in Chinese Adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1