Charting the course: America's energy crossroads and the quest for a sustainable future

S. Oprea, A. Bâra
{"title":"Charting the course: America's energy crossroads and the quest for a sustainable future","authors":"S. Oprea, A. Bâra","doi":"10.1111/ajes.12576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy and environment views of over 10,000 American respondents are captured in a complex survey created by the Pew Research Center (PRC). This paper is based on data collected during a panel wave that took place in May 2022. The survey aims to capture the nuanced perspectives of a nationally representative group of U.S. adults, with particular attention to ensuring participation from traditionally underrepresented or hard‐to‐reach demographics. To analyze the responses, we cluster raw and encoded data and identify the main groups of respondents and their characteristics. Three main clusters are identified using K‐means (silhouette score of .78) with a larger cluster “Mainstream Respondents” that shows moderate views on energy and environmental issues. The second cluster “Outliers or Niche Group” is the smallest cluster representing respondents with unique or extreme views, high income or education levels or specific demographic attributes that set them apart from the majority. The third cluster “Specific Interest Group” has moderate size and characteristics that are distinct but not as extreme as the second cluster. On the other hand, two more balanced clusters (4265/6017) are obtained with K‐modes (Davies–Bouldin Index 2.61) using the unencoded data: “Traditional Energy Advocates” highlights the cluster's preference for traditional energy sources over alternative or renewable energy sources (RES), and “Sustainable Future Supporters” emphasizes the cluster's support for environmental sustainability and RES. These names aim to succinctly capture the essence of each cluster's predominant attitudes toward energy and environmental issues, reflecting their preferences and priorities. The results are significant for understanding trends within the U.S. population, informing policymakers and contributing to academic research.","PeriodicalId":507302,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Economics and Sociology","volume":"34 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Economics and Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy and environment views of over 10,000 American respondents are captured in a complex survey created by the Pew Research Center (PRC). This paper is based on data collected during a panel wave that took place in May 2022. The survey aims to capture the nuanced perspectives of a nationally representative group of U.S. adults, with particular attention to ensuring participation from traditionally underrepresented or hard‐to‐reach demographics. To analyze the responses, we cluster raw and encoded data and identify the main groups of respondents and their characteristics. Three main clusters are identified using K‐means (silhouette score of .78) with a larger cluster “Mainstream Respondents” that shows moderate views on energy and environmental issues. The second cluster “Outliers or Niche Group” is the smallest cluster representing respondents with unique or extreme views, high income or education levels or specific demographic attributes that set them apart from the majority. The third cluster “Specific Interest Group” has moderate size and characteristics that are distinct but not as extreme as the second cluster. On the other hand, two more balanced clusters (4265/6017) are obtained with K‐modes (Davies–Bouldin Index 2.61) using the unencoded data: “Traditional Energy Advocates” highlights the cluster's preference for traditional energy sources over alternative or renewable energy sources (RES), and “Sustainable Future Supporters” emphasizes the cluster's support for environmental sustainability and RES. These names aim to succinctly capture the essence of each cluster's predominant attitudes toward energy and environmental issues, reflecting their preferences and priorities. The results are significant for understanding trends within the U.S. population, informing policymakers and contributing to academic research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指明方向:美国的能源十字路口和对可持续未来的追求
皮尤研究中心(PRC)进行的一项复杂调查收集了 10,000 多名美国受访者对能源和环境的看法。本文基于 2022 年 5 月进行的一次小组调查所收集的数据。调查旨在捕捉具有全国代表性的美国成年人群体的细微观点,尤其关注确保传统上代表性不足或难以接触到的人口群体的参与。为了分析受访者的回答,我们对原始数据和编码数据进行了聚类,并确定了受访者的主要群体及其特征。使用 K-均值法(剪影得分 0.78)确定了三个主要群组,其中一个较大的群组为 "主流受访者",该群组显示了对能源和环境问题的温和观点。第二个群组 "离群者或利基群体 "是最小的群组,代表具有独特或极端观点、高收入或高教育水平或特定人口属性的受访者,使他们有别于大多数受访者。第三个群组 "特定兴趣小组 "规模适中,特点鲜明,但不如第二个群组极端。另一方面,利用未编码数据的 K-模式(戴维斯-博尔丁指数 2.61)得到了两个较为均衡的聚类(4265/6017):"传统能源倡导者 "强调该聚类偏好传统能源而非替代能源或可再生能源(RES),"可持续未来支持者 "强调该聚类支持环境可持续性和可再生能源。这些名称旨在简明扼要地捕捉每个群组对能源和环境问题的主要态度的本质,反映他们的偏好和优先事项。这些结果对于了解美国人口的发展趋势、为政策制定者提供信息以及促进学术研究都具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Centralized climate clubs and decentralized governance: A model of global CO2 mitigation Charting the course: America's energy crossroads and the quest for a sustainable future Evangelicals and global warming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1