Validation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for Detection of Posttraumatic Stress in Children and Adolescents Following Procedures for Acute Orthopaedic Trauma

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1097/bot.0000000000002842
Collin May, Hillary Brenda Nguyen, Patricia Miller, Justyna Klajn, Emily S. Rademacher, Michaela O’Connor, Daniel Hedequist, Benjamin Shore
{"title":"Validation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for Detection of Posttraumatic Stress in Children and Adolescents Following Procedures for Acute Orthopaedic Trauma","authors":"Collin May, Hillary Brenda Nguyen, Patricia Miller, Justyna Klajn, Emily S. Rademacher, Michaela O’Connor, Daniel Hedequist, Benjamin Shore","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The efficiency and validity of PROMIS surveys were determined for pediatric orthopaedic trauma patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in a clinic setting.\n \n \n \n \n Design: Prospective cohort study.\n \n \n \n Single-institution, Level I Trauma Center.\n \n \n \n All consecutive children aged 8-18 years undergoing procedures or surgery for orthopaedic trauma.\n \n Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity of the PROMIS Anger and Anxiety computerized adaptive tests (CATs) were evaluated and compared to the previously validated Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS). The efficiency in time to completion of the outcome measures was compared between the CPSS and PROMIS surveys. Cutoffs for increased likelihood of PTSD were established for the PROMIS questionnaires.\n \n \n \n A total of 233 subjects were included in this study (mean age 13.1 years with SD 2.8 years, 71% male). The majority (51%) of injuries were sports-related and most (60%) involved the upper extremity. Of those included, 41 patients had high levels of PTSD symptoms on the CPSS (18%; 95% CI=13.1-23.2%). The CPSS took 182 (IQR 141-228) seconds versus 52 (IQR 36-84) and 52 (IQR 36-70) seconds for PROMIS Anger and Anxiety CATs, respectively. Convergent validity showed patient scores on both PROMIS instruments significantly correlated with CPSS scores (Anger: p<0.001, r=0.51; Anxiety: p<0.001, r=0.41). Neither PROMIS score correlated with UCLA Activity Score (Anger: r=-0.26; Anxiety: r=-0.22), a functional outcome measure, demonstrating divergent validity. Both PROMIS instruments sufficiently discriminated across PTSD risk groups (Anger p<0.001; Anxiety p<0.001). A score of at least 53 on PROMIS Anger or at least 48 on PROMIS Anxiety indicated an increased likelihood of PTSD risk.\n \n \n \n PROMIS Anger and Anxiety CATs are efficient and valid for evaluating posttraumatic stress in children following orthopaedic trauma procedures.\n \n \n \n Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\n","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002842","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficiency and validity of PROMIS surveys were determined for pediatric orthopaedic trauma patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in a clinic setting. Design: Prospective cohort study. Single-institution, Level I Trauma Center. All consecutive children aged 8-18 years undergoing procedures or surgery for orthopaedic trauma. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity of the PROMIS Anger and Anxiety computerized adaptive tests (CATs) were evaluated and compared to the previously validated Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS). The efficiency in time to completion of the outcome measures was compared between the CPSS and PROMIS surveys. Cutoffs for increased likelihood of PTSD were established for the PROMIS questionnaires. A total of 233 subjects were included in this study (mean age 13.1 years with SD 2.8 years, 71% male). The majority (51%) of injuries were sports-related and most (60%) involved the upper extremity. Of those included, 41 patients had high levels of PTSD symptoms on the CPSS (18%; 95% CI=13.1-23.2%). The CPSS took 182 (IQR 141-228) seconds versus 52 (IQR 36-84) and 52 (IQR 36-70) seconds for PROMIS Anger and Anxiety CATs, respectively. Convergent validity showed patient scores on both PROMIS instruments significantly correlated with CPSS scores (Anger: p<0.001, r=0.51; Anxiety: p<0.001, r=0.41). Neither PROMIS score correlated with UCLA Activity Score (Anger: r=-0.26; Anxiety: r=-0.22), a functional outcome measure, demonstrating divergent validity. Both PROMIS instruments sufficiently discriminated across PTSD risk groups (Anger p<0.001; Anxiety p<0.001). A score of at least 53 on PROMIS Anger or at least 48 on PROMIS Anxiety indicated an increased likelihood of PTSD risk. PROMIS Anger and Anxiety CATs are efficient and valid for evaluating posttraumatic stress in children following orthopaedic trauma procedures. Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证 "患者报告结果测量信息系统"(PROMIS)以检测急性骨科创伤手术后儿童和青少年的创伤后应激反应
针对诊所环境中出现创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的小儿骨科创伤患者,确定 PROMIS 调查的效率和有效性。 设计:前瞻性队列研究。 单一机构、一级创伤中心。 所有连续接受矫形创伤手术或外科手术的 8-18 岁儿童。 结果测量和比较:评估 PROMIS 愤怒和焦虑电脑适应性测试 (CAT) 的收敛性、发散性和判别性,并与之前验证过的儿童创伤后应激障碍症状量表 (CPSS) 进行比较。比较了 CPSS 和 PROMIS 调查完成结果测量的时间效率。为 PROMIS 问卷确定了创伤后应激障碍可能性增加的临界值。 本研究共纳入 233 名受试者(平均年龄 13.1 岁,标准差 2.8 岁,71% 为男性)。大部分(51%)受伤与运动有关,大部分(60%)涉及上肢。在纳入的患者中,有 41 名患者在 CPSS(18%;95% CI=13.1-23.2%)中出现了严重的创伤后应激障碍症状。CPSS 用时 182(IQR 141-228)秒,而 PROMIS 愤怒和焦虑 CAT 用时分别为 52(IQR 36-84)秒和 52(IQR 36-70)秒。聚合效度显示,患者在 PROMIS 和 CPSS 两项工具上的得分均与 CPSS 分数显著相关(愤怒:p<0.001,r=0.51;焦虑:p<0.001,r=0.41)。PROMIS 评分与功能性结果测量指标 UCLA 活动评分均无相关性(愤怒:r=-0.26;焦虑:r=-0.22),这表明两者之间存在差异。两种 PROMIS 工具都能充分区分创伤后应激障碍风险群体(愤怒 p<0.001;焦虑 p<0.001)。PROMIS 愤怒指数得分至少达到 53 分,或 PROMIS 焦虑指数得分至少达到 48 分,表明患创伤后应激障碍风险的可能性增加。 PROMIS愤怒和焦虑CAT对于评估矫形创伤手术后儿童的创伤后应激反应既有效又有效。 有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Do All Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhages Need to Be Transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center?" Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Photon Avalanching Nanoparticles Conjugated Oligoelectrolytes as Optical Probes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1