His Holiness Patriarch Sergius, Metropolitan Gregory and the Theological Schools of the Moscow Patriarchy from 1944 to 2024

L. K. Aleksandrova-Chukova
{"title":"His Holiness Patriarch Sergius, Metropolitan Gregory and the Theological Schools of the Moscow Patriarchy from 1944 to 2024","authors":"L. K. Aleksandrova-Chukova","doi":"10.53822/2712-9276-2024-2-174-205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article commemorates two significant events marking the 80th anniversary of the Russian Orthodox Church in 2024: the passing of His Holiness Patriarch Sergius and the establishment of the first theological schools in Moscow during the Soviet era. The question of establishing theological schools was raised by Patriarch Sergius following the Council of Bishops in 1943 and his subsequent election as patriarch. These schools were inaugurated just a month after his passing. It’s emphasized that the swift preparation for the opening of the Theological Institute and Theological and Pastoral courses was facilitated by the quarter-century journey of the patriarch’s long-time faithful colleague, Archpriest Nikolay Chukov (Archbishop Gregory of Saratov and Stalingrad), who authored the project for spiritual educational institutions of the Moscow Patriarchate. He had substantial experience in establishing and overseeing higher theological institutions in Petrograd-Leningrad from 1920 to 1925. For the first time, a diary detailing the activities of Archpriest Nikolay Chukov is published in the appendix. His endeavors, undertaken with the support of Metropolitan Sergius  and the Synod from 1928 to 1930, aimed to establish a Theological Institute in Leningrad. Unfortunately, his plans were thwarted by his arrest in 1930. The entries in the published diary confirm Olga Vasilyeva’s assertion that Metropolitan Sergius’ interview, which sparked widespread protests due to its denial of Church persecution in the USSR, was a quid pro quo for allowing him to submit a memo to Pyotr Smidovich. One of the memo’s points emphasized the necessity of opening a theological school. This memo played a pivotal role in obtaining permission, which, in turn, significantly hastened the process of opening theological schools in Moscow in 1943–1944. The article concludes with excerpts from books and articles by a professor from the Department of Church History at Saint Petersburg Theological Academy. This academic offers a negative and ironic assessment of both the ascetic work of Metropolitan Gregory of Leningrad and Novgorod, and the martyrdom of Patriarch Sergius, who endured humiliation primarily to preserve a legalized church organization, which was essential for the establishment of theological schools within the Patriarchate. This aspect became particularly significant when considering the pivotal choice by the authorities between the patriarchal Church and the Renovationists in 1943.","PeriodicalId":512431,"journal":{"name":"Orthodoxia","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodoxia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-2-174-205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article commemorates two significant events marking the 80th anniversary of the Russian Orthodox Church in 2024: the passing of His Holiness Patriarch Sergius and the establishment of the first theological schools in Moscow during the Soviet era. The question of establishing theological schools was raised by Patriarch Sergius following the Council of Bishops in 1943 and his subsequent election as patriarch. These schools were inaugurated just a month after his passing. It’s emphasized that the swift preparation for the opening of the Theological Institute and Theological and Pastoral courses was facilitated by the quarter-century journey of the patriarch’s long-time faithful colleague, Archpriest Nikolay Chukov (Archbishop Gregory of Saratov and Stalingrad), who authored the project for spiritual educational institutions of the Moscow Patriarchate. He had substantial experience in establishing and overseeing higher theological institutions in Petrograd-Leningrad from 1920 to 1925. For the first time, a diary detailing the activities of Archpriest Nikolay Chukov is published in the appendix. His endeavors, undertaken with the support of Metropolitan Sergius  and the Synod from 1928 to 1930, aimed to establish a Theological Institute in Leningrad. Unfortunately, his plans were thwarted by his arrest in 1930. The entries in the published diary confirm Olga Vasilyeva’s assertion that Metropolitan Sergius’ interview, which sparked widespread protests due to its denial of Church persecution in the USSR, was a quid pro quo for allowing him to submit a memo to Pyotr Smidovich. One of the memo’s points emphasized the necessity of opening a theological school. This memo played a pivotal role in obtaining permission, which, in turn, significantly hastened the process of opening theological schools in Moscow in 1943–1944. The article concludes with excerpts from books and articles by a professor from the Department of Church History at Saint Petersburg Theological Academy. This academic offers a negative and ironic assessment of both the ascetic work of Metropolitan Gregory of Leningrad and Novgorod, and the martyrdom of Patriarch Sergius, who endured humiliation primarily to preserve a legalized church organization, which was essential for the establishment of theological schools within the Patriarchate. This aspect became particularly significant when considering the pivotal choice by the authorities between the patriarchal Church and the Renovationists in 1943.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1944 至 2024 年莫斯科宗主教谢尔盖宗主教、格雷戈里大主教阁下和莫斯科宗主教神学院
文章纪念了 2024 年俄罗斯东正教会成立 80 周年的两个重大事件:谢尔盖宗主教逝世和苏联时期在莫斯科建立第一所神学院。建立神学院的问题是谢尔盖宗主教在 1943 年主教会议之后提出的,随后他当选为宗主教。在他逝世后仅一个月,这些学校就正式成立了。需要强调的是,牧首的长期忠实同事尼古拉-丘科夫大主教(萨拉托夫和斯大林格勒的格雷戈里大主教)在四分之一世纪的旅程中为神学院和神学与牧师课程的开设做了大量准备工作,他是莫斯科牧首区精神教育机构项目的发起人。从 1920 年到 1925 年,他在彼得格勒-列宁格勒建立和监督高等神学院方面积累了丰富的经验。附录中首次出版了尼古拉-丘科夫大主教的活动日记。1928 年至 1930 年期间,他在谢尔盖都主教和主教会议的支持下,致力于在列宁格勒建立一所神学院。不幸的是,他的计划因 1930 年被捕而受挫。已出版的日记中的条目证实了奥尔加-瓦西里耶娃的说法,即谢尔盖大主教的采访因否认教会在苏联受到迫害而引发了广泛抗议,这是他向皮奥特-斯密多维奇提交备忘录的交换条件。备忘录的其中一点强调了开办神学院的必要性。这份备忘录在获得许可方面发挥了关键作用,反过来又大大加快了 1943-1944 年在莫斯科开办神学院的进程。文章最后摘录了圣彼得堡神学院教会历史系教授的著作和文章。这位学者对列宁格勒和诺夫哥罗德的格列高里都主教的苦行和谢尔盖牧首的殉难进行了负面和讽刺性的评价,谢尔盖牧首忍辱负重主要是为了维护合法化的教会组织,而合法化的教会组织对于在牧首辖区内建立神学院至关重要。考虑到 1943 年当局在宗主教教会和革新派之间做出的关键抉择,这一点变得尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky): Ministry and Destiny “The Patriarchal Authority Always Remains Present in the Church in its Entirety”: Patriarch Tikhon, Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky) and the Ideas of Church Democracy Sergius (Stragorodsky), Archbishop of Finland and Vyborg — features of pastoral service in political and sociocultural contexts Patriarch Alexy I (Simansky) as the Successor of Patriarch Sergius (Stragorodsky) “What Kind of Antichrist Is This? I Don't Recognize Him”: Patriarch Tikhon and Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky) in Their Struggle Against the Notion of a “Spiritual Antichrist”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1