Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients with External Fixation: A Two Center Case Series.

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1097/bot.0000000000002843
Jacob S. Borgida, Robert Kaspar Wagner, Alice W. Wong, Seonghwan Yee, Jad S. Husseini, Arun Aneja, Mitchel B. Harris, Thuan V. Ly
{"title":"Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients with External Fixation: A Two Center Case Series.","authors":"Jacob S. Borgida, Robert Kaspar Wagner, Alice W. Wong, Seonghwan Yee, Jad S. Husseini, Arun Aneja, Mitchel B. Harris, Thuan V. Ly","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To report on adverse events during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on patients with external fixators.\n \n \n \n \n Design: Retrospective case series.\n \n \n \n Two Level 1 Trauma Centers.\n \n \n \n Patients with external fixators on the appendicular skeleton or pelvis undergoing MRI between January 2005 and September 2023.\n \n Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Adverse events, defined as any undesirable event associated with the external fixator being inside or outside the MRI bore during imaging, including: (subjective) heating, displacement or pullout of external fixator, or early MRI termination for any reason.\n \n \n \n Ninety-seven patients with 110 external fixators had at least one MRI with an external fixator inside or outside of the MRI bore. The median age was 51 years (IQR: 39 – 63) and 56 (58%) were male. The most common external fixator locations were the ankle (24%), knee (21%), femur (21%), and pelvis (19%). The median duration of an MRI was 40 minutes (IQR: 26 – 58), 86% were performed using 1.5 Tesla MRI, and 14% were performed using 3.0 Tesla MRI. Ninety-five percent of MRI were performed for the cervical spine/head. Two MRI scans (1.6%), one of the shoulder and one of the head and cervical spine, with the external fixator outside of the bore were terminated early due to patient discomfort. There were no documented events of displacement or pullout of the external fixator.\n \n \n \n These findings suggest that MRI of the (cervical) spine and head can be safely obtained in patients with external fixators on the appendicular skeleton or pelvis. Given the low numbers of MRIs performed with the external fixator inside the bore, further studies are necessitated to determine the safety of this procedure. The results from this study can aid orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, and other stakeholders in developing local institutional guidelines on MRI scanning with external fixators in situ.\n \n \n \n Prognostic Level lV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\n","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"19 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002843","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To report on adverse events during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on patients with external fixators. Design: Retrospective case series. Two Level 1 Trauma Centers. Patients with external fixators on the appendicular skeleton or pelvis undergoing MRI between January 2005 and September 2023. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Adverse events, defined as any undesirable event associated with the external fixator being inside or outside the MRI bore during imaging, including: (subjective) heating, displacement or pullout of external fixator, or early MRI termination for any reason. Ninety-seven patients with 110 external fixators had at least one MRI with an external fixator inside or outside of the MRI bore. The median age was 51 years (IQR: 39 – 63) and 56 (58%) were male. The most common external fixator locations were the ankle (24%), knee (21%), femur (21%), and pelvis (19%). The median duration of an MRI was 40 minutes (IQR: 26 – 58), 86% were performed using 1.5 Tesla MRI, and 14% were performed using 3.0 Tesla MRI. Ninety-five percent of MRI were performed for the cervical spine/head. Two MRI scans (1.6%), one of the shoulder and one of the head and cervical spine, with the external fixator outside of the bore were terminated early due to patient discomfort. There were no documented events of displacement or pullout of the external fixator. These findings suggest that MRI of the (cervical) spine and head can be safely obtained in patients with external fixators on the appendicular skeleton or pelvis. Given the low numbers of MRIs performed with the external fixator inside the bore, further studies are necessitated to determine the safety of this procedure. The results from this study can aid orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, and other stakeholders in developing local institutional guidelines on MRI scanning with external fixators in situ. Prognostic Level lV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外固定骨科创伤患者磁共振成像的安全性:两中心病例系列
报告使用外固定器的患者在磁共振成像(MRI)期间发生的不良事件。 设计:回顾性病例系列。 两家一级创伤中心。 2005 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月期间接受核磁共振成像检查的阑尾骨骼或骨盆外固定器患者。 结果测量和比较:不良事件,定义为成像过程中与外固定器位于 MRI 孔内或孔外相关的任何不良事件,包括:(主观)加热、外固定器移位或拔出,或因任何原因提前终止 MRI。 97名患者共使用了110个外固定器,至少有一次核磁共振成像时外固定器在核磁共振成像孔内或孔外。中位年龄为 51 岁(IQR:39 - 63),男性 56 人(58%)。最常见的外固定器位置是踝关节(24%)、膝关节(21%)、股骨(21%)和骨盆(19%)。核磁共振成像的中位持续时间为 40 分钟(IQR:26 - 58),86% 使用 1.5 特斯拉核磁共振成像,14% 使用 3.0 特斯拉核磁共振成像。95%的磁共振成像是针对颈椎/头部进行的。有两次核磁共振成像扫描(1.6%),一次是肩部扫描,一次是头部和颈椎扫描,外固定器在孔外,由于患者不适而提前终止。没有外固定器移位或脱出的记录。 这些研究结果表明,在阑尾骨骼或骨盆上使用外固定器的患者可以安全地进行(颈椎)脊柱和头部的核磁共振成像检查。鉴于外固定器在孔内进行核磁共振成像的数量较少,有必要进行进一步研究以确定该手术的安全性。这项研究的结果可帮助矫形外科医生、放射科医生和其他利益相关者制定有关在原位使用外固定器进行核磁共振成像扫描的地方性机构指南。 预后等级lV。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Do All Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhages Need to Be Transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center?" Function Decoupling and Modular Platform: Emerging Design Principles for MOF Luminescent Sensing. Computation-Driven Experimental Discovery of Reactivity Space of Organoboron Compounds. Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1