Grazing Management Plan Adoption and Objective Prioritization in U.S. Cow-Calf and Stocker Operations

IF 1.6 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1017/aae.2024.13
Minfeng Tang, Cassandra Kniebel Aherin, D. Pendell, Myriah D. Johnson, Ashley McDonald, Phillip A. Lancaster
{"title":"Grazing Management Plan Adoption and Objective Prioritization in U.S. Cow-Calf and Stocker Operations","authors":"Minfeng Tang, Cassandra Kniebel Aherin, D. Pendell, Myriah D. Johnson, Ashley McDonald, Phillip A. Lancaster","doi":"10.1017/aae.2024.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examines the grazing management plans (GMPs) adoption and prioritization of environmental and economic objectives among U.S. cow-calf and stocker operations, utilizing 2020–2021 survey data and logistic regression analysis. Findings reveal regional adoption differences, with higher rates in the Midwest. Operations with succession plans, larger grazing lands, and stocker activities are more likely to adopt GMPs. Operations with more privately owned land and smaller herd sizes prefer environmental goals, while those with less grazing land prioritize economic outcomes due to resource concerns. The study provides insights for policies promoting GMP adoption and sustainability in the U.S. beef sector.","PeriodicalId":14970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2024.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the grazing management plans (GMPs) adoption and prioritization of environmental and economic objectives among U.S. cow-calf and stocker operations, utilizing 2020–2021 survey data and logistic regression analysis. Findings reveal regional adoption differences, with higher rates in the Midwest. Operations with succession plans, larger grazing lands, and stocker activities are more likely to adopt GMPs. Operations with more privately owned land and smaller herd sizes prefer environmental goals, while those with less grazing land prioritize economic outcomes due to resource concerns. The study provides insights for policies promoting GMP adoption and sustainability in the U.S. beef sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国奶牛-小牛和放养牧场的放牧管理计划采用情况和目标优先顺序
本研究利用 2020-2021 年的调查数据和逻辑回归分析,考察了美国奶牛-小牛和放养牧场采用放牧管理计划 (GMP) 的情况以及环境和经济目标的优先次序。调查结果显示了地区采用率的差异,中西部地区的采用率更高。有继承计划、牧场面积较大且从事放养活动的牧场更有可能采用 GMP。拥有更多私有土地和牧群规模较小的牧场更倾向于环境目标,而拥有较少牧场的牧场则出于对资源的考虑,优先考虑经济效益。这项研究为促进美国牛肉行业采用 GMP 和可持续性的政策提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, the Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics is a forum for creative and scholarly work in agricultural economics and related areas. Contributions on methodology and applications in business, extension, research, and teaching phases of agricultural and applied economics are equally encouraged. As of 2015 (Vol 47), articles are published on an open access basis.
期刊最新文献
A Micro-perspective Analysis of the Demand for Greek and Non-Greek Yogurt in the United States Over Calendar Years 2018 to 2020 Grazing Management Plan Adoption and Objective Prioritization in U.S. Cow-Calf and Stocker Operations Economic Analysis of Calving Assistance on Western Canadian Cow-Calf Operations Land Ownership Security, Farm Investment, and Investment Risk in Indian Agriculture: Evidence from Nationally Representative Survey Cultivating Support: An Ex-Ante Typological Analysis of Farmers’ Responses to Multi-Peril Crop Insurance Subsidies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1