Trend Analysis of Industry Payments to Dermatologists in the United States from 2015-2022

Nicole J. Hardy, C. Gronbeck, Hao Feng
{"title":"Trend Analysis of Industry Payments to Dermatologists in the United States from 2015-2022","authors":"Nicole J. Hardy, C. Gronbeck, Hao Feng","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.3.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Open Payments, established in 2013 to address concerns about industry-driven healthcare influence, aims to enhance transparency regarding financial relationships between industry and physicians. This study investigates trends in industry payments to dermatologists between 2015 and 2022, a topic that has not been explored since a prior characterization in 2014. \nMethods: We conducted a retrospective review of United States dermatologists appearing in the Open Payments database between 2015 and 2022. A Joinpoint analysis was performed to calculate the average annual percentage change (AAPC) across study years. A sensitivity analysis excluding 2020-2021 data was conducted. \nResults: This study reviewed 2,616,289 payments totaling $494,271,790 made to dermatologists during the study period. The average annual percentage change (AAPC) across these years for the number of recipient dermatologists, total value of payments, and total number of payments were 1.5%, 5.5%, and 3.9%, respectively, with confirmed positive growth when excluding data from 2020-2021. \nConclusions: Payments per dermatologist have increased over the years, even when adjusting for inflation, but this growth is likely attributed to the overall expansion of the specialty. Most individual payments to dermatologists were less than $50. However, a substantial proportion of dermatologists (60%) received total payments exceeding $1000 during the study period. These findings suggest a longitudinal nature of industry-dermatologist relationships and emphasize the financial significance of payments over time. Notably, the impact of physician-industry relationships on patient care in dermatology remains debated but may influence medical decision-making and engender patient distrust.","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":"6 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.3.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Open Payments, established in 2013 to address concerns about industry-driven healthcare influence, aims to enhance transparency regarding financial relationships between industry and physicians. This study investigates trends in industry payments to dermatologists between 2015 and 2022, a topic that has not been explored since a prior characterization in 2014. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of United States dermatologists appearing in the Open Payments database between 2015 and 2022. A Joinpoint analysis was performed to calculate the average annual percentage change (AAPC) across study years. A sensitivity analysis excluding 2020-2021 data was conducted. Results: This study reviewed 2,616,289 payments totaling $494,271,790 made to dermatologists during the study period. The average annual percentage change (AAPC) across these years for the number of recipient dermatologists, total value of payments, and total number of payments were 1.5%, 5.5%, and 3.9%, respectively, with confirmed positive growth when excluding data from 2020-2021. Conclusions: Payments per dermatologist have increased over the years, even when adjusting for inflation, but this growth is likely attributed to the overall expansion of the specialty. Most individual payments to dermatologists were less than $50. However, a substantial proportion of dermatologists (60%) received total payments exceeding $1000 during the study period. These findings suggest a longitudinal nature of industry-dermatologist relationships and emphasize the financial significance of payments over time. Notably, the impact of physician-industry relationships on patient care in dermatology remains debated but may influence medical decision-making and engender patient distrust.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015-2022 年美国皮肤科医生行业薪酬趋势分析
背景:开放支付(Open Payments)成立于 2013 年,旨在解决业界对医疗保健影响的担忧,旨在提高业界与医生之间财务关系的透明度。本研究调查了 2015 年至 2022 年间行业向皮肤科医生支付费用的趋势,这是自 2014 年的上一次特征描述以来尚未探讨过的话题。方法:我们对 2015 年至 2022 年间出现在开放支付数据库中的美国皮肤科医生进行了回顾性审查。我们进行了联点分析,以计算各研究年份的年均百分比变化(AAPC)。进行了一项敏感性分析,排除了 2020-2021 年的数据。研究结果本研究审查了研究期间向皮肤科医生支付的 2,616,289 笔款项,总金额达 494,271,790 美元。在这些年份中,收款皮肤科医生人数、付款总值和付款总数的年均百分比变化(AAPC)分别为 1.5%、5.5% 和 3.9%,在排除 2020-2021 年的数据后,确认了正增长。结论:即使考虑通货膨胀因素,每名皮肤科医生的付费额也在逐年增加,但这种增长很可能是由于该专业的整体扩张所致。大多数皮肤科医生的个人薪酬低于 50 美元。然而,在研究期间,有相当一部分皮肤科医生(60%)的总收入超过了 1000 美元。这些研究结果表明,行业与皮肤科医生的关系具有纵向性质,并强调了随着时间推移支付的经济意义。值得注意的是,医生与行业的关系对皮肤科患者护理的影响仍有争议,但可能会影响医疗决策并导致患者不信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Off-Label Uses of Upadacitinib Stability of Long-Term Therapeutic Responses to Tralokinumab in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis What Do Clinicians Mean When Submitting a Biopsy as “Rule Out Eczema” Deucravacitinib in Plaque Psoriasis: Maintenance of Response Over 4 Years in the Phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and LTE Trials Zosteriform Atrophoderma of Pasini and Pierini: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1